![]() |
Who will win? US Army vs. ALL OF Europe's combined Armies?
My vote would be USA!!!!! Sure, its got its share of problems, but I'm sure it can easily pimp out the whole combined EU army.
|
i poop on u
|
i dont know, its not doing a great job in iraq. But certainly france would surrender.
|
My dad can beat up your dad.
|
Not sure, if you look at gdp spending on miliatry for UK Germany, France, you could be way down on those 3 added together
|
How about US Vs CHINA or EU+CHINA
|
Quote:
|
Didn't we have a thread practically verbatim to this a couple months ago?
|
Its not the amount of cash you spend on your military... it is whether you military is composed of BRAVE people:2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
who cares who would win, it isnt something that would happen.
|
Quote:
Unless Bush gets re-electected:warning |
well, the US army is bigger than the next 5 biggest armies combined... i forget which countries they are though.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Isreal has a fucking HUGE army. It's to do with equipment and skills more than numbers though:Graucho
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
China has the largest army in the world. |
My country is better than yours :321GFY
|
never heard so stupid things except "Irak got massive destruction weapon" !
Is it CIA telling you we will be an Islamic Republic ? Work on you site Dude instead to run stupid thread ! Note : France got Atomic weapon, if Bush want to lose some millions of people in USA, let's do it ! |
Quote:
In china all kids have to join the army at 15 for a few years though lol |
Quote:
|
If the rest of the world turned against the USA, the USA would be fucked.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_wea_hol http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_arm_for_per http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/...va_mal_age_154 IMHO China could take us if Europe didn't assist us. They have almost as much weaponry, with twice the armed forces, and three times the available manpower; growing rapidly every year. Throw in N.Korea and we don't stand a chance. EU + Russia could fuck us up too. But that's less politically likely. Of course, nukes still gaurantee Mutually Assured Destruction. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
MORE doesn't necessarily mean BETTER
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_for_in_eur_air
weird, how come US has so few aircrafts. This nationmaster site is full of shit. Half of the stats are completely retarded. |
For sale:
French assault rifle , never been used , dropped once the U.S will take them with no problem the only thing that those countries can do is talking... |
Quote:
|
All i have to say is the US air and navel power would reduce china to rubble before they even saw a US soldier.
|
eu
|
tie
all die |
Quote:
|
USA would win because our president would fly his plane to victory after the invasion...Oh wait thats inependence day. But seriously we would win because we have better weapons and better personel. So what if the chinese have more soldiers? They are malnourished. Oh and the french..Please they wouldn't have the guts to mess with us in the first place and if they did how are they planning on bombing here? They don't have the rocket technology and if they did they would send it over here and once it hit the mainland on inspection it would turn out that the war head was full of white flags:1orglaugh
|
whole europe (with russia) would demage whole USA, and Bush would be sucking Putin's , Kwasniewski's , Shroeder's and Berlusconi's dicks
|
Quote:
|
Ya can not win a war without the heart and minds of those you conquer.
|
Quote:
You may want to put the crack pipe down when posting at GFY. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123