![]() |
State of the Union -MAKE IT STOP
This article and picture on Politco.com sums it all up well
http://mintesfiles.com/gfy/sotu_clowns.jpg But the anodyne English the Obama White House used in the usual frenzied run-up to Tuesday night?s speech seemed to have reached a new level of emptiness, owing more to Procter & Gamble than to Jefferson and Madison. ?A year of action.? ?Pen and phone.? ?Opportunity for All.? ?Rewarding Hard Work.? Such phrases evoke advertisements for ?new and improved? products no one needs, not meaningful articulation of policy or political belief. Perhaps the framers were wrong to include a single sentence in the Constitution stipulating that the president ?shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union.? Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/0...#ixzz2roMhdBY6 |
What is your point here exactly?
Yet another U.S. career politician used a bunch of buzz words to rile the rabble in his 'State of the Union' speech? Is there something out of the ordinary that is different from any other year beyond him being a black guy? :helpme |
Did anyone else want to throw a tomato at John Boehner's smug face? They should block out his face next time.
|
Quote:
|
Not surprised who started this thread.
|
Oh yeah?
Yo momma! :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So the President used buzz words to make some new promises that he most likely won't keep. Surprise, surprise, surprise. Nothing new here.
Meanwhile, A Republican threatens to throw a reporter off a balcony and then threatens to "break him in half" WHILE ON CAMERA. Sweet. |
Quote:
This is how they did it in Rome, this is how we should do it today. I can't wait for the Games to begin. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you would've you would relate to the Politco story and cartoon. |
Quote:
Typical. For reference, the clown on the right is NOT a democrat. edit..it would've been great theater if the republican would've thrown the guy off the roof. |
I thought punk John Boehner was going to cry when Obama recognized his roots (son of a bartender). I thought that gesture was nice though. Obama didn't have to do it at all considering all the disrespect and shit Boehner tosses at Obama every day.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well hell i thought the speech was good. I could not stop laughing at the Republican response when it was playing.
|
guess you dont have xbox or cable tv :( turn it over to channel 8 :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
The speech was exactly what the last 20 of them have been. A complete waste of time.
The more interesting thing is the number of Republican 'official responses' The GOP strength was always speaking with one voice and reciting the same talking points. Now the GOP is a bus with a few passengers and a dozen people claiming to be the driver. |
why do you care who is president when you have only 2 choice
|
Quote:
Both 'choices' are prepaid and funded by the exact same people. |
I had read confirmations of supreme court justices wasnt the show it is today until they added tv cameras in.Its the same thing with SOTU.
|
LOL @ American politics. :)
|
Quote:
|
John Boehner needs to go..
|
Minte, ever thought about running for office?
If you did you'd quickly come to realize the worth of pandering to the lowest common denominator. :D |
I always watch Obama's speeches on FOX, so I can listen to those idiots afterwards misrepresent everything the guy just said, and turn what sound like pretty positive sounding messages into the end of America. It's just entertaining for me and I like seeing their pain.
|
Quote:
Quote:
But at a certain point it's irrevalent. The State Of The Union speech is the same no matter who gives it - It talks about past accomplishments, future hopes and plans, and of course some exaggerations. The Democrats hear what they want to hear and the Republicans hear what they want to hear; They all hear the same exact speech yet walk away with something totally different. Our best bet is to ignore the speech and then read the results the day after. His prior speech had an overall 53% approval rating, where as this one the other night had a 44%. That says a lot. What did his speech say? That he's tired of fucking around with Congress? Congress has the lowest approval rating in my lifetime, isn't getting anything done when we need them the most, and instead is putting all of their effort into fighting a bill that is already a law. Come on already, stop playing fucking games. When you aren't a Republican or a Democrat, you don't see things from one point of view - and it's fucking funny. Republicans keep complaining - Republicans are complaining that a Democratic president can't fix a Republican problem with a Republican Congress. Really? Meant time, unemployment is down to 6.7% and dropping, and just yesterday there was a report that our economy grew 3.4% last quarter alone. Who do you think you are fooling? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd say that Pres. Obama actually had a lot of us believing he would be different in 2008. I guess myself and many in this country were actually wanting "hope and change". It's turned out completely the opposite. I was listening to a radio show here in Vegas that comes on in the afternoon yesterday. It's hosted by a guy named Ken Wahl. It's called "Live And Local". He pointed out that Obama's State Of The Union speech drew 4 million less viewers than George Bush's SOTU at the lowest point of his popularity (the 2008 State Of The Union Address) Pres. Obama's job approval ratings are now the lowest of any Pres. since Richard Nixon during the Watergate Scandal. And this morning, I was watching the "conservative" show on MSNBC: Morning Joe They were ripping on the SOTU. Saying that after a "disastrous" 2013, that America had "Obama Fatigue" and that it was pretty obvious that his presidency is pretty much over. The only hope they had for him was that they said that in the last year or two, a Pres. will get ambitious because they have nothing to lose and will go all out and actually get things done. I'm thinking that didn't work out for our last 2 Presidents. Both Bush and Clinton had really strong 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th years in office. But the 7th and 8th years left them both as damaged goods (remember, Al Gore wouldn't even let Clinton campaign for him because of his unpopularity in 2000...hard to believe now). Since Obama hasn't even had ONE great year in his Presidency...it ain't looking good for him to finish strong in my opinion. And a lot of the problems he is facing are from his ego. He really thinks he can just do as he pleases and people have to fall in line. He doesn't even try to compromise. One pundit said something like: Compare the tone of George Washington's State of The Union address where the whole idea was that he was NOT a "king" and that the branches of govt. were equal under the constitution to what Obama is saying about taking "unilateral" action and how he has a pen and a phone. There is also a new poll showing that Obama is the most DIVISIVE President in modern history. This is hardly what I voted for back in 2008. |
Quote:
I voted for Obama strictly because of Bush's failure in both the Iraq war and Afghan war. Both McCain and Romney promised more of the same and planed to extend the Iraq war even longer. Had either of those two been voted into office, you can bet your ass we would have troops in Syria or Iran. Obama did what he promised with both wars and he put the focus back on fighting the war on terror. I don't think he's been perfect in doing this, but he has done 100% better than the Bush admin did. Overal I think US policy is wrong and we do bad things around the world that cause much of our problems, but that's not just a Obama issue.. It's a policy issue that allows the CIA and Jsoc to run amok. As far as the economy Obama wasn't perfect but the economy is doing better than it would have with Mitt or McCain. Both would have tried to push the same failed approach that is killing this country and they would of made it worse. Simply put I don't vote so much in support of the Democrats, but more so to keep the right from fucking up the country even more. If you believe what any politician says then you are setting yourself up for a let down. |
I can see your point crockett.
I, unfortunately really thought that Obama was gonna be "different". Then I realized I kinda thought that about Bill Clinton and George Bush too when they were first elected. That's when I knew I was being a sucker for the two party system. |
Quote:
I love you Robbie. I really do. You said Obama's approval ratings are now the lowest of any President since Nixon. In fact, the direct opposite is true. Obama's lowest approval rating, 38% (October 16 2011) is HIGHER than the lowest approval rating of ALL the Presidents since Nixon. Bush, 25%, October 31, 2008 Clinton, 37%, May 26, 1993 Bush, 29%, July 31, 1992 Reagan, 35%, January 28, 1983 Carter, 28%, June 29, 1979 Ford, 37%, March 28, 1975 Nixon, 24%, August 2, 1974 And while I'm looking at stats, did you know that Obama's highest approval rating of 69% (January 22, 2009) is higher than Reagan's highest approval rating (May 16, 1986)? (I am pulling my stats from Wikipedia.) The more you repeat such lies, the more you'll believe them. (Can I go back to work now?) |
Quote:
|
Gift of gab and hope and change can only go so far. Too bad he fooled so many for so long. Even many of his staunchest allies realize this one trick pony is played out. After several years of cyclical "dead cat bounce," we're heading deeper down the shitter in 2014.
|
Quote:
I'm not a Democrat, and I don't believe Obama is our savior. But open your eyes already. Things are A LOT better than they were when he first took office. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Obamacare took all the steam out of a real recovery. Then along with that, all the rhetoric about redistribution of wealth has kept the economy at a low simmer. All business owners hear out of Washington is more tax. That drowns out anything positive. Now it's we need to pay people more. I don't hear a thing about working at leveling out the playing field with China. Not a word about taxing imports at the same rate the Chinese do with what we sell there. Price of a new Corvette in China- $245.000 http://jalopnik.com/the-new-corvette...ina-1135359468 |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123