So will Republicans still consider Rand Paul after this?
 

Rachel Maddow: Rand Paul PLAGIARIZES



Rachel Maddow: Rand Paul PLAGIARIZES, Again!


Lol! What a fucking twit.

Good luck in 2016.

In politics anything is possible.

Look at Joe Biden. He left the Pres. race in 1988 in disgrace over plagarism and no Democrat wanted anything to do with him.

Now he's a hero to Democrats.

All of us sheeple will just accept any goddamn thing that any politician says or does I guess.

I blame Bush for Rand Paul's plagarism by the way...

Holy crap you are a more than a complicit operative, useful idiot.
The brainwashed-mind of the useful idiot is psychologically incapable of receiving information which is counter to the world-view within which it has been inculcated and more importantly, do they allow smoking in Mr. Maddow world?

Yes Republicans will still consider Ran Paul after this. For the same reason they ran the recent (losing)election on anti-abortion, anti-gay, anti-education, anti-healthcare, anti-immigrants, anti-gun control, anti-minorities. They're too fucking stupid to get out of their own way. Most of them aren't even smart enough to know what plagiarism is. Ran Paul obviously isn't.

This guy is a doctor. I wouldn't ask him to pop a pimple for me.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/947a863ed...engno1_500.png

More examples of Rand Paul plagiarizing have started coming out:





Rand Paul's Op-Ed column in the conservative Washington Times was terminated as a result of the recent plagiarism charges:

Source: Washington Times

http://i.imgur.com/820qkS6.jpg

:stoned

ADG

I don't consider borrowing a 'plot synopsis' of a movie or book from a website to be serious plagiarism, the 'writers/editors' of Wikipedia aren't even attributed. If I'm a public speaker preparing a speech and a movie, book, a historical event comes to mind to illustrate a thought I want to communicate, of course I'm going to do a little research and consult an encyclopedia/wikipedia/website/newspaper archives - I'm sure not going to just trust my memory off the top of my head. His only mistake and it's not a big mistake was copying the movie description word for word, rather than describing the exact same movie synopsis in his own words.

Serious plagiarism in my opinion is stealing somebody else's original thoughts and the words used to convey them. I don't consider a movie synopsis to be anybody's orginal thoughts.

Lazy yes, unethical no.

Got to love Jon Stewart...

http://www.sabinabecker.com/media/rand-paul-did-not.jpg

Check the other examples of Rand Paul plagiarism that are beginning to surface, such as the 3 pages of plagiarism caught in a Rand Paul "authored" book. :2 cents:

:stoned

ADG

He's talking about the movie. What's the problem with taking excerpts from the wiki about the movie? Seriously this is supposed to end his career? I don't even see the issue here.

Much ado about nothing.

I heard the attribution for all the quotes in his book are indexed, they just weren't all footnoted on the individual pages. He's already promised to do a reprint right?

sheeple herders - 1,395,447
sheeple - 0

"Baaaa, Baaaa... Baaaa, Baaaa... Baaaa, Baaaa..." said the sheeple.

If people can accept a president that bold face lies to the people, they will accept anything.

http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/23...2c6adee723.jpg

:stoned

ADG

you are right Bush lied and soldiers died.

It runs a lot deeper than you know. Look into it.

Turn on the news, Tony

They are still dieing. 5 years later. But they will get great insurance when they rotate back to the world.

And people wanted to impeach him, should we then want to impeach Obama for lying to the American public to get his agenda through?

I don't think Rand is serious contender

I believe Chris Christie is what the democrats don't want to see run against Hillary

excuse me? is this the same rand paul who represents the extremists of the right? the extreme right who think god blames homosexuals and homosexuals only for the category 5 hurricanes sweeping across the mid-west or up and down the east coast? you only have to follow the right wing watch blog on youtube to know how dangerous and downright stupid those right wingers are. that is the real republican party, an organisation of christian religious nutters who will shoot you for being a bum or a fag.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Thats exactly what he did....more than once.

Hahaha - good luck with that, talk about the elephant in the room, Christie is a moderate Republican from Jersey, he'll be up against the same group of religious right and Tea Party loons ganging up against him in the early primaries that Romney had to deal with. Even if he survives that they'll have made him look like a liberal in conservative's clothing and probably worse.

"Double Down", the just released book on the 2012 Presidential race goes into great detail regarding Romney's process of picking his running mate. Romney's right hand man wanted Christie, so did Romney, but what his campaign dug up about Christie scared Romney off, he's got a lot of baggage and I'm sure the Clintons are already following up on the dirt found by Romney's people.

And Romney is quite the classy guy, he was making fat jokes about Christie in front of everybody, in Christie's presence - 60 year old rich douche acting like he's the captain of the high school football team ridiculing the fatso.

I'd like to see Christie run, would make for great political theater.

funny how all the drama currently in canadian politics still can't get the op off his obsession with usa reublicans. plenty there to start a thread about but nope.

Let's see this serious offense of plagiarism he's committed.

i think Chris Christie is what most Republicans don't want to see running against whoever..

4 years of Christie ripping on his own party would be entertaining.

I'm not going to get into a debate over the subjectiveness of what is serious or not. The guy took complete paragraphs word for word and played them off as his words. That my friend is what plagiarism is.


pla·gia·rize
verb \ˈplā-jə-ˌrīz also -jē-ə-\

: to use the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas

I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN! - impeachable lie

You CAN keep your existing health insurance policy - impeachable lie?

Here's something you don't know about American Politics

Majority of Americans are moderate

Independent voters make up 40% of the electorate.

If somehow Christie could bring the full force of the republicans together and with 4.5 million people having to pay higher insurance costs ( in 5 states they are double ) I think he would have a chance, unless they didn't learn from the mistakes Romney made.

The key is uniting republicans and getting the independent vote

The republican party needs it, or don't you agree?

The Clintons I think could not survive a good debate if done right.
Hillary really did a shitty job as secretary of state.

and as a senator she did some fine work, like her crusade again the video game Grand Theft Auto

Christie is already a Democrat.

He stands a better chance of becoming prez if he defects.

You didn't answer the question!

in the current state of the republican party, a moderate has no chance to survive the preliminaries - the crazies have taken over

Edit: but it would be great if that changed

The republican party needs change, Christie seems to be the kind of person that could do just that. Being a moderate, he is more likely to work with both sides. That makes for a good leader. Unlike what we have now, someone that only works with one side and gets nothing done to help the economy. He's done more to separate than to bring together

You mean the same Chris Christie whom the right wing was trying to vilify and burn at the stake, because he dared to talk with Obama.. Now the guy, whom the tea party tried to bash relentlessly is now the only hope? :lol

So you have a problem with a republican that wants to work with the democrats?

Forgive me for saying this, but hasn't that been your biggest complaint about the GOP, is that they don't work with the president?

The problem with Rand Paul will be how do you run on a premise of personal freedom when your path to the white house is dependent on christian voters.

How do you reconcile the position that drugs are a personal choice but abortion isn't. How do you say the government has too much power in peoples lives then stand against gay marriage.

The other main issue will be how do you propose to cut the military when there are evil Muslims looking to harm America. The GOP has deep military ties and Paul's proposed budget cuts and his opinion of the military in general will be a tough sell to the GOP establishment.

Paul's ideology is not in step with core Republican principles so I have a hard time thinking his presidential fate will be any different from his Dads

The plagiarism is a minor problem, many politicians have overcome

You can talk all you want about being neutral -- but you have political axe to grind that slants in one hard direction.

Sorry, but come on... Don't you think that American politics is just so much more... colourful?