GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Looking For More Producers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=978115)

gleem 07-28-2010 09:17 PM

very interesting thread

TrashyContent 07-28-2010 09:22 PM

My Opinion... For What It's Worth...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mmcfadden (Post 17371221)
You say that again you have an enemy.

You have a choice here... say you were mistaken or take the other avenue. Right now your head is up your ass and have no clue what your talking about.

Hey Mmcfadden... here is my prospective on things for what it's worth...

1. He is drunk...

2. He is high...

3. He is both 1 and 2...

4. He is on Meds For some serious ass pain !...

5. He is on Meds, Drunk and High (most likely scenario)

6. He really does believe his own hype, in which case god help us all...

7. He had been GFY raped and someone else is posting as him !

JustDaveXxx 07-28-2010 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gleem (Post 17371227)
very interesting thread

Agreed:thumbsup

Peter Romero 07-28-2010 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmcfadden (Post 17371221)
You say that again you have an enemy.

You have a choice here... say you were mistaken or take the other avenue. Right now your head is up your ass and have no clue what your talking about.

I cannot copy our convo on ICQ but here are the highlights:

6 scenes for $500. $650 with pictures.

Peter Romero 07-28-2010 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrashyContent (Post 17371236)
Hey Mmcfadden... here is my prospective on things for what it's worth...

1. He is drunk...

2. He is high...

3. He is both 1 and 2...

4. He is on Meds For some serious ass pain !...

5. He is on Meds, Drunk and High (most likely scenario)

6. He really does believe his own hype, in which case god help us all...

7. He had been GFY raped and someone else is posting as him !


Fiddler, this guy can't do the job either. Please contact me. Sober 22 years.

TrashyContent 07-28-2010 09:27 PM

Hmmm....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Romero (Post 17371242)
Fiddler, this guy can't do the job either. Please contact me. Sober 22 years.

You really are mis quoting everyone today aint you oh great photographic/sales guru...

not cant, try dont want to lol... good luck with the pitch :winkwink: :thumbsup

PS maybe you should take drinking up again... was you a angry drunk ?

PPS Off to bed now, 5.30am in the UK... so play nicely without me... will catch up when I wake up in about 7 hours love you all lol

mmcfadden 07-28-2010 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Romero (Post 17371242)
Fiddler, this guy can't do the job either. Please contact me. Sober 22 years.

minus 1 day of sobriety

don't , just don't

Fiddler 07-29-2010 12:34 AM

Well it's nice that this thread got that much attention.

I've been contacted by several producers for work at this rate (with a minimum spend of course). Plus I have 4 producers who currently operate at this level for me 2 of which I did mention in my post.

If you can't afford to do it at the rate I asked then just don't get involved because I'm not going to pay more when I have 4 producers on the go and others who are interested in the work.

Fiddler 07-29-2010 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmcfadden (Post 17371164)
OP... you will not get 150 per scene... sorry dude

I already am.... but thanks for the heads up :D

Paul Markham 07-29-2010 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisK (Post 17369295)
Those prices are closer to none-exclusive than to exclusive stuff I would say :(

It's a sad reflection on the industry when sponsors will or can only afford to pay $150 a scene and shooters are prepared to work for that little.

We used to shoot a magazine version of exgf content for magazines. They called it "Readers Wives" content. It was easy, we only shot stills. Shoot 10 minutes + 25 pics, shoot 10 girls on a casting and I can see how it would work for those shooting for Fiddler.

Fiddler takes what girls who turn up so gets a good mix, ugly to hot.

The downside is, if $1500 is the best you can make from 10 scenes in a day, video and set, you're doing something very wrong. If that's all the sponsor can/will pay he's also doing something very wrong.

Paul Markham 07-29-2010 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmcfadden (Post 17371003)
How many times in a day can a girl insert large objects in her pussy? The reason I ask is bc the number is 3, after that she gets sore and cranky. That then leads to how $any shoots you can sell, ya know homie.

True. And something I pointed out to people wanting 5 scenes on a day. The girls faked their way through it and the site often did not retain.

charlie g 07-29-2010 05:36 AM

Let's face it, we are in a buyers market right now. If I didn't have other shit making rent I might consider the offer. But I am not that desperate......... yet.

CaptainHowdy 07-29-2010 05:59 AM

Interesting turn of events...

Paul Markham 07-29-2010 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 17371736)
Let's face it, we are in a buyers market right now. If I didn't have other shit making rent I might consider the offer. But I am not that desperate......... yet.

And as soon as sponsors and affiliates realize it the better. :1orglaugh

TrashyContent 07-29-2010 06:08 AM

Yep
 
Well have to state the obvious but I am 100% with Paul on this one... By what he say's he has them queing up to do this work... 8...9... 10 producers all willing to work for peanuts... the industry really is in a tragic state !

I'll stick to making less sales for more money lol...

mmcfadden 07-29-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Romero (Post 17371240)
I cannot copy our convo on ICQ but here are the highlights:

6 scenes for $500. $650 with pictures.

The reason I reached out was bc I was looking for somebody in the us to shoot my games with solo scene at end. I told you that I was getting foreign at 3 games for 500 hundo. Even said that I know it will be more and asked u for a quote.

Your quote was 600 for 1 game. That was too high and I did not take u up on it.

Ironic that in this thread u raving how u can now do it for 150 ;). Not a game but a solo shot.

NaughtyRob 07-29-2010 09:02 PM

Just saw this thread, its VERY fucking easy to shoot exclusive SOLO stuff for $150 per set. For example I hired a milf a few weeks ago and shot her for $300. I shot 4 pic sets and 6 videos and was out of there in an hour and a half. Keep in mind people this is amateur style. Took me two hours of work for this, I made a profit and shot a bj video of her for free.

Loch 07-29-2010 09:09 PM

Peter i got to where you said that you are the best salesman bar none LMFAO
Now go shoot 10 sets in a day, get your 1500 bucks and keep 300-400 after expenses

Yeah that is a GREAT hourly wage :1orglaugh

Ohh jesus i just love when people say they are great at sales while undercutting to get business....
Which is exactly what people that cant sell shit do hehe

Peter Romero 07-29-2010 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyRob (Post 17374013)
Just saw this thread, its VERY fucking easy to shoot exclusive SOLO stuff for $150 per set. For example I hired a milf a few weeks ago and shot her for $300. I shot 4 pic sets and 6 videos and was out of there in an hour and a half. Keep in mind people this is amateur style. Took me two hours of work for this, I made a profit and shot a bj video of her for free.

Word. Everyone is still trying to shoot scenes one at a time - at retail prices. This just wont do these days. It didn't do in the past either, but now you'll go broke trying to shoot one scene at a time. Porn companies are folding like napkins at a wedding and no-one is adapting at all. It's just crazy. I'm not gonna give away all my production secrets here but everyone saying it can't be done better open thier minds or get another job.

And to Loch - I never said I was the best salesman, I said I was one of the best he'll ever meet. Joe Gerard wrote a great book "How to sell anything to anyone". Since you're so flush with everyone here turning down work - go buy it for $10 and read it and then we'll argue about it. And tell me how to be a better salesman - I'm all ears. And I'm not too old and set in my ways to learn something new. I'd rather make a sale and break even (not that I did on this one) and have a new client than argue on an adult message board how something can't be done. Get off the cross - we need the wood.

Loch 07-29-2010 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Romero (Post 17374093)
Word. Everyone is still trying to shoot scenes one at a time - at retail prices. This just wont do these days. It didn't do in the past either, but now you'll go broke trying to shoot one scene at a time. Porn companies are folding like napkins at a wedding and no-one is adapting at all. It's just crazy. I'm not gonna give away all my production secrets here but everyone saying it can't be done better open thier minds or get another job.

And to Loch - I never said I was the best salesman, I said I was one of the best he'll ever meet. Joe Gerard wrote a great book "How to sell anything to anyone". Since you're so flush with everyone here turning down work - go buy it for $10 and read it and then we'll argue about it. And tell me how to be a better salesman - I'm all ears. And I'm not too old and set in my ways to learn something new. I'd rather make a sale and break even (not that I did on this one) and have a new client than argue on an adult message board how something can't be done. Get off the cross - we need the wood.

Peter i will keep it short as im on my way out.
Shooting at prices like that CAN be done everyone knows that and you havent invented anything new....every good producer i know always books girls 8+ hours minimum, its the way it has always been done.

I have seen your work and its good.
Honestly go for the business i dont care...good on you.
However i now also know what i can get away with for your quality work should we ever end up talking about that.....you just undercut your own business in public and even snuffed at people laughing at prices like that.

There are still a LOT of companies paying 500-1000 for solos and 2k+ for hardcores/Lesbian
And even more than that.

PS, I already know how to sell anything to everyone if i can sell at any price,
However to be able to keep an office and feed 6/7 people you cant, that is where you actually have to know how to sell, analyse your markets and execute your strateries.

And yes i turn away any business for exclusive under 25k pr contract
Its not that im too proud or think that im too good for money less than that it is for the simple reason that we can make more money doing other things.

Paul Markham 07-29-2010 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyRob (Post 17374013)
Just saw this thread, its VERY fucking easy to shoot exclusive SOLO stuff for $150 per set. For example I hired a milf a few weeks ago and shot her for $300. I shot 4 pic sets and 6 videos and was out of there in an hour and a half. Keep in mind people this is amateur style. Took me two hours of work for this, I made a profit and shot a bj video of her for free.

And here you see why the customers, the people who put the money on the table, are turning away from buying.

That must be some real kick ass content. It takes 20 minutes to move the equipment, model to change clothes and instruct her how to make the next scene a little different. It takes and hour for her to get her breath back. 6 videos in 2 hours. :Oh crap

Amateur has always been about a girl or/and guy doing it for the fun of it. Having an orgasm and being real. Some shooters on the adult Net have used the word Amateur for crap.

*************

I never said it could not be done. I said anyone shooting for these prices is doing something wrong. A sponsor who can/will only pay these prices is also doing something wrong. Customers what ever the niche are not paying for content shot like it was a race. They want something that makes them sit up and take notice.

Peter Romero 07-29-2010 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loch (Post 17374118)
Peter i will keep it short as im on my way out.
Shooting at prices like that CAN be done everyone knows that and you havent invented anything new....every good producer i know always books girls 8+ hours minimum, its the way it has always been done.

I have seen your work and its good.
Honestly go for the business i dont care...good on you.
However i now also know what i can get away with for your quality work should we ever end up talking about that.....you just undercut your own business in public and even snuffed at people laughing at prices like that.

There are still a LOT of companies paying 500-1000 for solos and 2k+ for hardcores/Lesbian
And even more than that.

PS, I already know how to sell anything to everyone if i can sell at any price,
However to be able to keep an office and feed 6/7 people you cant, that is where you actually have to know how to sell, analyse your markets and execute your strateries.

And yes i turn away any business for exclusive under 25k pr contract
Its not that im too proud or think that im too good for money less than that it is for the simple reason that we can make more money doing other things.

Dude. Stop. Really... everyone else too. It's not a glam shoot, or even one that requires LIGHTS! It's not a boy/girl scene, it's a bunch of short Ex-GF solo scenes plus a little POV. Did anyone read the original message? It's not an anal gang bang staring every single expensive contract porn star and stunt cock in porn valley in a $1000 an hour location. It's something I can shoot in a few hours. And it's easy. On top of it all - after my day's pay I'll have 3/4 of the day to shoot something for someone else or my 5 sites... FOR FUCKING FREE!!! OR PROFIT!!! GET IT!!!

Production is like painting a house: it's all in the set-up: picking the paint, mixing it, buying ther pans and the brushes, taping everything off, laying down the drop cloths, etc... And once everything is prepped... do you just paint 1 wall? Hell no. 1 room? Fuck no! You paint the whole fucking house. Figure it out... or go work @ Taco Bell. And webmasters - if your producers cannot work within your budget, hit me up and maybe I can help you. If not, I'll send you to someone who can... if I can - or to this thread. Toodles!

Loch 07-29-2010 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Romero (Post 17374202)
Dude. Stop. Really... everyone else too. It's not a glam shoot, or even one that requires LIGHTS! It's not a boy/girl scene, it's a bunch of short Ex-GF solo scenes plus a little POV. Did anyone read the original message? It's not an anal gang bang staring every single expensive contract porn star and stunt cock in porn valley in a $1000 an hour location. It's something I can shoot in a few hours. And it's easy. On top of it all - after my day's pay I'll have 3/4 of the day to shoot something for someone else or my 5 sites... FOR FUCKING FREE!!! OR PROFIT!!! GET IT!!!

Production is like painting a house: it's all in the set-up: picking the paint, mixing it, buying ther pans and the brushes, taping everything off, laying down the drop cloths, etc... And once everything is prepped... do you just paint 1 wall? Hell no. 1 room? Fuck no! You paint the whole fucking house. Figure it out... or go work @ Taco Bell. And webmasters - if your producers cannot work within your budget, hit me up and maybe I can help you. If not, I'll send you to someone who can... if I can - or to this thread. Toodles!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

AaronM 07-30-2010 12:05 AM

Although I see some good points on both sides, the one thing that I can tell you is that the days of shooting the same girl for multiple clients in the same day are long gone for me. Not only did I find it a complete waste of time, I found that those clients were often the worst to deal with.

Beyond that...I think it's disrespectful, to my loyal clients, to offer to "piggy back" a cheap shoot off of their dime. Risking the loss of a loyal client for a few hundred bucks more is simply a foolish and greedy thing to do.

As for the client the extra stuff is being shot for, delivering a shot out model to them isn't really fair either. They may have a lower budget but they still want decent content for what they can afford. The only exception I can think of for working a model that hard is if you are shooting for a solo site and the "tired" look contributes to the "personality/different looks" factor.

There used to be a shooter here who got caught shooting the same exact sets and models for two clients. He would shoot for client A with Camera A on the right side of the bed and use camera B for client B on the left side. Just jump back and forth as the model stripped.

I guess what I'm getting at is that just because you "can" do something does not mean that you should. :2 cents:

Peter Romero 07-30-2010 12:17 AM

Hey Aaron - hit me up on ICQ. Maybe it's time we burried the hatchet.

Deej 07-30-2010 01:11 AM

how in the fuck can one even manage to pay a girl properly...yourself... the rest of your bills with rates like that... or even close to.

also, with this video/picture set... youre shooting it twice? No fucking flashes in your video right? Thats double dongin alone.


anyway, its all been said...

Paul Markham 07-30-2010 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17374285)
Although I see some good points on both sides, the one thing that I can tell you is that the days of shooting the same girl for multiple clients in the same day are long gone for me. Not only did I find it a complete waste of time, I found that those clients were often the worst to deal with.

Beyond that...I think it's disrespectful, to my loyal clients, to offer to "piggy back" a cheap shoot off of their dime. Risking the loss of a loyal client for a few hundred bucks more is simply a foolish and greedy thing to do.

As for the client the extra stuff is being shot for, delivering a shot out model to them isn't really fair either. They may have a lower budget but they still want decent content for what they can afford. The only exception I can think of for working a model that hard is if you are shooting for a solo site and the "tired" look contributes to the "personality/different looks" factor.

There used to be a shooter here who got caught shooting the same exact sets and models for two clients. He would shoot for client A with Camera A on the right side of the bed and use camera B for client B on the left side. Just jump back and forth as the model stripped.

I guess what I'm getting at is that just because you "can" do something does not mean that you should. :2 cents:

Great post Aaron. Guess those piggy backing a "Free" shoot on another clients money don't have too many scruples.

Is that "Free" shoot the property of the guy who's paying the costs of the day. Morally or legally?

Peter, how do your clients think about this? :1orglaugh

Nikki_Licks 07-30-2010 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17374371)
how in the fuck can one even manage to pay a girl properly...yourself... the rest of your bills with rates like that... or even close to.

also, with this video/picture set... youre shooting it twice? No fucking flashes in your video right? Thats double dongin alone.


anyway, its all been said...

I have no idea how someone can pay the model, pay an assistant and get paid them selves. This just doesn't make sense. Even if you leave out the PA, your time is worth something as is the model. Studio and equipment costs should also be included in the shoot fees.

And then the video...hell I give up at this moment.

Nikki_Licks 07-30-2010 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17374285)
Although I see some good points on both sides, the one thing that I can tell you is that the days of shooting the same girl for multiple clients in the same day are long gone for me. Not only did I find it a complete waste of time, I found that those clients were often the worst to deal with.

Beyond that...I think it's disrespectful, to my loyal clients, to offer to "piggy back" a cheap shoot off of their dime. Risking the loss of a loyal client for a few hundred bucks more is simply a foolish and greedy thing to do.

As for the client the extra stuff is being shot for, delivering a shot out model to them isn't really fair either. They may have a lower budget but they still want decent content for what they can afford. The only exception I can think of for working a model that hard is if you are shooting for a solo site and the "tired" look contributes to the "personality/different looks" factor.

There used to be a shooter here who got caught shooting the same exact sets and models for two clients. He would shoot for client A with Camera A on the right side of the bed and use camera B for client B on the left side. Just jump back and forth as the model stripped.

I guess what I'm getting at is that just because you "can" do something does not mean that you should. :2 cents:

Good post!

I have a question for you. How would this be exclusive if you shot using the style you mentioned in your post, both sides of the bed, different cameras?

If I paid a producer for exclusive and saw another set similar to the set that was supposed to be exclusive....with the same clothes, same setting and so on, I would not be a happy camper.
I would not call that exclusive, but then again...that is just me.

JustDaveXxx 07-30-2010 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17374285)
Although I see some good points on both sides, the one thing that I can tell you is that the days of shooting the same girl for multiple clients in the same day are long gone for me. Not only did I find it a complete waste of time, I found that those clients were often the worst to deal with.

Beyond that...I think it's disrespectful, to my loyal clients, to offer to "piggy back" a cheap shoot off of their dime. Risking the loss of a loyal client for a few hundred bucks more is simply a foolish and greedy thing to do.

As for the client the extra stuff is being shot for, delivering a shot out model to them isn't really fair either. They may have a lower budget but they still want decent content for what they can afford. The only exception I can think of for working a model that hard is if you are shooting for a solo site and the "tired" look contributes to the "personality/different looks" factor.

There used to be a shooter here who got caught shooting the same exact sets and models for two clients. He would shoot for client A with Camera A on the right side of the bed and use camera B for client B on the left side. Just jump back and forth as the model stripped.

I guess what I'm getting at is that just because you "can" do something does not mean that you should. :2 cents:


Great post dude.:thumbsup


You are always a great read dude.:thumbsup




To Peter Romeros defense, he actually owns his own sites, which makes it a bit easier to piggy back. But any other client who is paying top dollar, in the same room over and over again would not be right, unless they know what the deal is.:2 cents:

emmanuelle 07-30-2010 01:04 PM

Seriously you guys- have you seen how many threads on the front page alone are about programs going under?

How about content companies?

When I buy content, I dont care about being piggybacked, in fact I encourage it. I want my content guy to stay in business.

As for 'doing something wrong', companies who have lowered the amounts they are willing to pay are doing something right. They're still in business. I recently heard quotes of $2500 to 4500 euros for a solo girl squirting scene! Are you fucking kidding me?
We all know that outside of LA, very few models earn more than a couple hundred dollars for an afternoon of solo anything. Don't kid yourself, I see performers handed $50-$100 all the time. These ridiculous rates aren't going to the talent, that's for sure.

You may feel that you are worth $300/hour, but it's not 2001 anymore.

Adapt or die.

AaronM 07-30-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emmanuelle (Post 17375854)
Seriously you guys- have you seen how many threads on the front page alone are about programs going under?

How about content companies?

When I buy content, I dont care about being piggybacked, in fact I encourage it. I want my content guy to stay in business.


So lets all lower our rates so we have less profit to stay in business longer!

Brilliant business plan you have there. :thumbsup

I'm not lowering my rates, I'm not going to piggback shoots, and I'm not going out of business any time soon. Use those bullshit lines on the newbies who don't know any better

The only people who don't care about piggybacked shoots are those who are too cheap to book real shoots.

emmanuelle 07-30-2010 01:35 PM

If you say so
Of course, not everyone is in the business to get blown by models under the guise of POV

Nikki_Licks 07-30-2010 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emmanuelle (Post 17375854)
Seriously you guys- have you seen how many threads on the front page alone are about programs going under?

How about content companies?

When I buy content, I dont care about being piggybacked, in fact I encourage it. I want my content guy to stay in business.

As for 'doing something wrong', companies who have lowered the amounts they are willing to pay are doing something right. They're still in business. I recently heard quotes of $2500 to 4500 euros for a solo girl squirting scene! Are you fucking kidding me?
We all know that outside of LA, very few models earn more than a couple hundred dollars for an afternoon of solo anything. Don't kid yourself, I see performers handed $50-$100 all the time. These ridiculous rates aren't going to the talent, that's for sure.

You may feel that you are worth $300/hour, but it's not 2001 anymore.

Adapt or die.

Just because someone is looking for cheap exclusive content, does not mean that other producers will go along with it and work for peanuts. Models for solo girl shoots go for 300 and up. I know some who have even paid 450.00 and more and that is just for the model.
So you tell me, where does the cost of my time, the studio, makeup and equipment come into play with your plan.

This thread was for exclusive content and I think piggy backing a shoot to sell to another client is deceitful at best and not a good business practice....just my opinion.

And just because a program is having hard times or going under and can only afford X amount to pay for content, do you think it is wise for us to follow suit of the company that is going under by giving our work away? If so, we would be heading down the same path as the company in trouble and would soon be out of business before too long.

I shoot content to make money, not to bail out any company that is on the verge of closing its doors, and I don?t make 300 an hour. If you don't have the money for exclusive content then buy content from a provider that has multiple sets for sale that have been sold 20 times over.

Disclaimer: I no way am I insinuating the person that started this thread is going out of business, I was responding to your comments.

Adapt or die? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Gerco 07-30-2010 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmcfadden (Post 17371003)
How many times in a day can a girl insert large objects in her pussy? The reason I ask is bc the number is 3, after that she gets sore and cranky. That then leads to how $any shoots you can sell, ya know homie.

LOL 3? Do more than that the first 15 minutes....

BittieBucks 07-30-2010 01:46 PM

Lol...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by emmanuelle (Post 17375962)
If you say so
Of course, not everyone is in the business to get blown by models under the guise of POV

Hey you are in the porn industry right... oh hang on your a girl, that explains your last statement :1orglaugh

AaronM 07-30-2010 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks (Post 17375964)
Just because someone is looking for cheap exclusive content, does not mean that other producers will go along with it and work for peanuts. Models for solo girl shoots go for 300 and up. I know some who have even paid 450.00 and more and that is just for the model.

I paid a grand to the model I shot yesterday and another grand to the model I shot the day before, all solo stuff. And the last I checked, I was not in LA.

Nikki_Licks 07-30-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17376026)
I paid a grand to the model I shot yesterday and another grand to the model I shot the day before, all solo stuff. And the last I checked, I was not in LA.

Woah! I must be getting them cheap after seeing what you pay.....

mmcfadden 07-30-2010 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerco (Post 17375977)
LOL 3? Do more than that the first 15 minutes....

Must be a fantastic 3 shoots there :thumbsup

marcop 07-30-2010 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 17375953)
I'm not lowering my rates, I'm not going to piggback shoots, and I'm not going out of business any time soon. Use those bullshit lines on the newbies who don't know any better

The only people who don't care about piggybacked shoots are those who are too cheap to book real shoots.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123