Design of my Twitter page looks probably better than my original website ! - GoFuckYourself.com

rokoroko · 04-24-2010, 12:06 PM

Just compare Twitter/CamAnal with CamAnal website

what do you think?

rokoroko · 04-25-2010, 11:05 AM

Nobody likes it ?

Platinumpimp · 04-25-2010, 11:06 AM

Is that a retorical question?

rokoroko · 04-25-2010, 11:20 AM

no, I would like to get any feedback form the adult business oriented persons here on board.

R

smutnut · 04-25-2010, 11:24 AM

One page seems unfunctional in Firefox and the other seems like a twitter page. Not sure what you are looking for and maybe neither does anyone else and thus lack of response. Or maybe they are trying to be kind.

I notice the pornhd page is functional at least. I'm talking about the interactivty of course

rokoroko · 04-25-2010, 11:49 AM

so the front page doesnt work for you ? This is interactive tool , which could have a prob by the browser type by users , but firefox is Ok for me .

Amputate Your Head · 04-25-2010, 11:49 AM

why are the graphics all stretched & distorted? Is that some kind of 'new look' or something I don't know about?

rokoroko · 04-25-2010, 11:55 AM

we have own original style of graphic not seen anywhere else ,

You are talking about the header logo or the banner below ? and the cams tool is working for you well ? have you seen Yumi there ? She is on the top of the list there.

smutnut · 04-25-2010, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rokoroko

so the front page doesnt work for you ? This is interactive tool , which could have a prob by the browser type by users , but firefox is Ok for me .

I just checked it out in ie. Works okay there but still don't know what you are asking. It's a cam page it looks like. Why do you want to know if it's good or better than your twitter page. Aren't we talking apples and oranges?

rokoroko · 04-25-2010, 12:02 PM

yes I would like to know about the functionality of it too and also , whether the twitter page is more taste of yours than the original page . Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks for your feedback Smutnut !

of course it is a Cam website , so it must be a visual attractive not disttractive to our visitors .

ottopottomouse · 04-25-2010, 12:16 PM

No offence just comments- all in firefox with 1280x1024 screen

Stretched bottom banner looks like it was done by a mental.

Max visitors today bit is all at the left then mixed with the footer text to create a whole new language that nobody can read.

Twitter page doesn't allow for anybody who hasn't got a huge screen - says CAMAtwitter for me.
Because it left-aligns you would be better off with your logo smaller and at 35° all over the page so screen size doesnt matter.

ottopottomouse · 04-25-2010, 12:19 PM

Fotter text is even more fucked in IE

TidalWave · 04-25-2010, 12:21 PM

why dont you spend $50-$100 on a new logo and $250-$500 on a new website so it actually looks good?

right now it makes me nauseous and looks like a fake site.

BigRod · 04-25-2010, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TidalWave

why dont you spend $50-$100 on a new logo and $250-$500 on a new website so it actually looks good?

right now it makes me nauseous and looks like a fake site.

Also remove 90% of the social media links on your page, most of the ones you have displayed don't allow adult content on their network.

halfpint · 04-25-2010, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

why are the graphics all stretched & distorted? Is that some kind of 'new look' or something I don't know about?

sorry man I had to laugh at that

Your footer text is not displaying corectly in firefox The text is over lapping on the thrid line ( max visitors) and yeah your logo at the bootom is all streched.. Not being funny here, the whole thing does not look right

Domain Broker · 04-25-2010, 01:33 PM

They are both terrible. You should be ashamed for showing us that garbage. Get a job at a fast food joint asap. Hell, maybe tonyparra on here could put in the shitty word for you at Subway.

TeenCat · 04-25-2010, 01:39 PM

i see no anal on your cam site

Waddymelon · 04-25-2010, 03:50 PM

Wont be long before people complain and twitter takes your page down.

smutnut · 04-25-2010, 05:40 PM

All that matters is if it makes money. The ugliest sites can make money but I don't think that is what you were asking?

lazycash · 04-26-2010, 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rokoroko

we have own original style of graphic not seen anywhere else ,

.

DamianJ · 04-26-2010, 02:26 AM

Very funny thread.

rokoroko · 04-26-2010, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutnut

All that matters is if it makes money. The ugliest sites can make money but I don't think that is what you were asking?

well, we have a 1:36 sign up ration with it on averadge adult traffic quality.

rokoroko · 04-26-2010, 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TeenCat

i see no anal on your cam site

this page has definately only the anal performrs on it - http://camanal.com/cam/ - page anal cam

smutnut · 04-26-2010, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rokoroko

well, we have a 1:36 sign up ration with it on averadge adult traffic quality.

Awesome ratio. Unless you're only getting 36 hits a day you should be owning a bank any time soon. I don't even know why you're worried what anybody thinks.

04-24-2010, 12:06 PM	#1
rokoroko Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	Design of my Twitter page looks probably better than my original website ! Just compare Twitter/CamAnal with CamAnal website what do you think?

04-25-2010, 11:06 AM	#3
Platinumpimp Logos and such. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands Posts: 10,214	Is that a retorical question? __________________ I design logo's.

04-25-2010, 11:55 AM	#8
rokoroko Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	we have own original style of graphic not seen anywhere else , You are talking about the header logo or the banner below ? and the cams tool is working for you well ? have you seen Yumi there ? She is on the top of the list there. Last edited by rokoroko; 04-25-2010 at 11:58 AM..

04-25-2010, 12:02 PM	#10
rokoroko Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	yes I would like to know about the functionality of it too and also , whether the twitter page is more taste of yours than the original page . Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks for your feedback Smutnut ! of course it is a Cam website , so it must be a visual attractive not disttractive to our visitors . Last edited by rokoroko; 04-25-2010 at 12:06 PM..

04-25-2010, 12:21 PM	#13
TidalWave Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,706	why dont you spend $50-$100 on a new logo and $250-$500 on a new website so it actually looks good? right now it makes me nauseous and looks like a fake site. __________________ www.SwiftNode.com

04-25-2010, 11:05 AM	#2
rokoroko Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	Nobody likes it ?

04-25-2010, 11:20 AM	#4
rokoroko Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	no, I would like to get any feedback form the adult business oriented persons here on board. R

04-25-2010, 11:24 AM	#5
smutnut So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Babylon Posts: 5,889	One page seems unfunctional in Firefox and the other seems like a twitter page. Not sure what you are looking for and maybe neither does anyone else and thus lack of response. Or maybe they are trying to be kind. I notice the pornhd page is functional at least. I'm talking about the interactivty of course

04-25-2010, 11:49 AM	#6
rokoroko Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	so the front page doesnt work for you ? This is interactive tool , which could have a prob by the browser type by users , but firefox is Ok for me .

04-25-2010, 11:49 AM	#7
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	why are the graphics all stretched & distorted? Is that some kind of 'new look' or something I don't know about?

04-25-2010, 12:16 PM	#11
ottopottomouse She is ugly, bad luck. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 13,177	No offence just comments- all in firefox with 1280x1024 screen Stretched bottom banner looks like it was done by a mental. Max visitors today bit is all at the left then mixed with the footer text to create a whole new language that nobody can read. Twitter page doesn't allow for anybody who hasn't got a huge screen - says CAMAtwitter for me. Because it left-aligns you would be better off with your logo smaller and at 35° all over the page so screen size doesnt matter.

04-25-2010, 12:19 PM	#12
ottopottomouse She is ugly, bad luck. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 13,177	Fotter text is even more fucked in IE

04-25-2010, 01:33 PM	#16
Domain Broker So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,427	They are both terrible. You should be ashamed for showing us that garbage. Get a job at a fast food joint asap. Hell, maybe tonyparra on here could put in the shitty word for you at Subway.

04-25-2010, 01:39 PM	#17
TeenCat Too lazy to set a koala Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: CZ/EU forever! Posts: 16,139	i see no anal on your cam site __________________ 6bot / Coming again very soon! Svit Zlin Radio 24/7!

04-25-2010, 03:50 PM	#18
Waddymelon So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: The Whitehouse Posts: 17,349	Wont be long before people complain and twitter takes your page down.

04-25-2010, 05:40 PM	#19
smutnut So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Babylon Posts: 5,889	All that matters is if it makes money. The ugliest sites can make money but I don't think that is what you were asking?

04-26-2010, 02:26 AM	#21
DamianJ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A magical land Posts: 15,808	Very funny thread.