Design of my Twitter page looks probably better than my original website !
 

Just compare Twitter/CamAnal with CamAnal website

what do you think?

Nobody likes it ?

Is that a retorical question?

no, I would like to get any feedback form the adult business oriented persons here on board.

R

One page seems unfunctional in Firefox and the other seems like a twitter page. Not sure what you are looking for and maybe neither does anyone else and thus lack of response. Or maybe they are trying to be kind.

I notice the pornhd page is functional at least. I'm talking about the interactivty of course

so the front page doesnt work for you ? This is interactive tool , which could have a prob by the browser type by users , but firefox is Ok for me .

why are the graphics all stretched & distorted? Is that some kind of 'new look' or something I don't know about?

we have own original style of graphic not seen anywhere else ,

You are talking about the header logo or the banner below ? and the cams tool is working for you well ? have you seen Yumi there ? She is on the top of the list there.

I just checked it out in ie. Works okay there but still don't know what you are asking. It's a cam page it looks like. Why do you want to know if it's good or better than your twitter page. Aren't we talking apples and oranges?

yes I would like to know about the functionality of it too and also , whether the twitter page is more taste of yours than the original page . Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks for your feedback Smutnut !

of course it is a Cam website , so it must be a visual attractive not disttractive to our visitors .

No offence just comments- all in firefox with 1280x1024 screen

Stretched bottom banner looks like it was done by a mental.

Max visitors today bit is all at the left then mixed with the footer text to create a whole new language that nobody can read.

Twitter page doesn't allow for anybody who hasn't got a huge screen - says CAMAtwitter for me.
Because it left-aligns you would be better off with your logo smaller and at 35° all over the page so screen size doesnt matter.

Fotter text is even more fucked in IE

why dont you spend $50-$100 on a new logo and $250-$500 on a new website so it actually looks good?

right now it makes me nauseous and looks like a fake site.

Also remove 90% of the social media links on your page, most of the ones you have displayed don't allow adult content on their network.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

sorry man I had to laugh at that


Your footer text is not displaying corectly in firefox The text is over lapping on the thrid line ( max visitors) and yeah your logo at the bootom is all streched.. Not being funny here, the whole thing does not look right

They are both terrible. You should be ashamed for showing us that garbage. Get a job at a fast food joint asap. Hell, maybe tonyparra on here could put in the shitty word for you at Subway.

i see no anal on your cam site

Wont be long before people complain and twitter takes your page down.

All that matters is if it makes money. The ugliest sites can make money but I don't think that is what you were asking?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Very funny thread.

well, we have a 1:36 sign up ration with it on averadge adult traffic quality.

this page has definately only the anal performrs on it - http://camanal.com/cam/ - page anal cam

Awesome ratio. Unless you're only getting 36 hits a day you should be owning a bank any time soon. I don't even know why you're worried what anybody thinks.