-
-
Nobody likes it ? -
Is that a retorical question?I design logo's.
Comment
-
no, I would like to get any feedback form the adult business oriented persons here on board.
RComment
-
One page seems unfunctional in Firefox and the other seems like a twitter page. Not sure what you are looking for and maybe neither does anyone else and thus lack of response. Or maybe they are trying to be kind.
I notice the pornhd page is functional at least. I'm talking about the interactivty of courseComment
-
so the front page doesnt work for you ? This is interactive tool , which could have a prob by the browser type by users , but firefox is Ok for me .Comment
-
why are the graphics all stretched & distorted? Is that some kind of 'new look' or something I don't know about?SIG TOO BIGComment
-
we have own original style of graphic not seen anywhere else ,
You are talking about the header logo or the banner below ? and the cams tool is working for you well ? have you seen Yumi there ? She is on the top of the list there.Last edited by rokoroko; 04-25-2010, 10:58 AM.Comment
-
yes I would like to know about the functionality of it too and also , whether the twitter page is more taste of yours than the original page . Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks for your feedback Smutnut !
of course it is a Cam website , so it must be a visual attractive not disttractive to our visitors .Last edited by rokoroko; 04-25-2010, 11:06 AM.Comment
-
No offence just comments- all in firefox with 1280x1024 screen
Stretched bottom banner looks like it was done by a mental.
Max visitors today bit is all at the left then mixed with the footer text to create a whole new language that nobody can read.
Twitter page doesn't allow for anybody who hasn't got a huge screen - says CAMAtwitter for me.
Because it left-aligns you would be better off with your logo smaller and at 35° all over the page so screen size doesnt matter.↑ see post ↑
13101Comment
-
Fotter text is even more fucked in IE↑ see post ↑
13101Comment
-
why dont you spend $50-$100 on a new logo and $250-$500 on a new website so it actually looks good?
right now it makes me nauseous and looks like a fake site.Comment
-
Comment
-
They are both terrible. You should be ashamed for showing us that garbage. Get a job at a fast food joint asap. Hell, maybe tonyparra on here could put in the shitty word for you at Subway.Comment
-
-
Wont be long before people complain and twitter takes your page down.Comment
-
All that matters is if it makes money. The ugliest sites can make money but I don't think that is what you were asking?Comment
-
Very funny thread.Comment
-
this page has definately only the anal performrs on it - http://camanal.com/cam/ - page anal camComment
Comment