Are You Unemployed Chart - GoFuckYourself.com

JC Maldini · 03-05-2010, 06:55 AM

Pretty interesting to see how the actual number is manipulated.

http://www.joerib.com/wp-content/upl...edgameshow.jpg

Iron Fist · 03-05-2010, 07:05 AM

Interesting....

CaptainHowdy · 03-05-2010, 07:16 AM

You can't blame 'em for crunching their numbers...

BIGTYMER · 03-05-2010, 07:21 AM

I'd expect nothing less from government.

woj · 03-05-2010, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead

Interesting....

indeed

kush · 03-05-2010, 09:16 AM

Yeah it's a bunch of crap how it's reported. Not a true representation.

CPimp · 03-05-2010, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

You can't blame 'em for crunching their numbers...

How can't you? I am a able bodied 23 year old man with a lot of experience in a few fields and some good ass references to back me up on it and I can't even get a damn job at mcdonalds? This 10% stuff is complete bullshit as it's already been exposed... but there is no way that you "can't blame them" for "crunching numbers". The whole reason why everything is as shitty as it is for people looking for jobs is BECAUSE of the government, and they want to try to mask the reality of it all and make it seem like its not their fault.

I personally think they did this all on purpose, jsut like I think other things were done on purpose and arranged by the govt, but I won't go into detail...

Maybe I need myself a blog for this kind of shit. Then I could rant and get it all out there hahaha

TheDoc · 03-05-2010, 12:48 PM

Not really anything new, it's always been this way.

Statistically it's a wash.. which isn't factored into that graph. People that get benefits cut off or they end, often end up getting jobs. It may not be full time, it might be cash under the table, or it could be a real job, but all of those balances aren't added back in either - they can't be tracked.

So it's better, to use the active unemployment numbers as a gauge of how things are going and keep the unknown out of the numbers.

pornguy · 03-05-2010, 12:56 PM

Silly as usual from them

kush · 03-05-2010, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Not really anything new, it's always been this way.

Statistically it's a wash.. which isn't factored into that graph. People that get benefits cut off or they end, often end up getting jobs. It may not be full time, it might be cash under the table, or it could be a real job, but all of those balances aren't added back in either - they can't be tracked.

So it's better, to use the active unemployment numbers as a gauge of how things are going and keep the unknown out of the numbers.

Huh?

I'm no economist - but how is NOT factoring in the underemployed or discouraged/given-up workers a better representation of how things are going?

Cyber Fucker · 03-05-2010, 03:01 PM

hehe... funny stuff

woj · 03-05-2010, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kush

Huh?

I'm no economist - but how is NOT factoring in the underemployed or discouraged/given-up workers a better representation of how things are going?

I would guess looking at "U3" and "U6" numbers is equivalent, the 2 numbers are probably closely correlated, and since U3 is easier to determine accurately, that's why everyone talks about that number instead of U6...

sure, the 2 numbers are way different, but that's not the point, the whole point of looking at statistics of this type is to determine trends, and looking at U3 is better for that since it's likely to be more accurate...

03-05-2010, 06:55 AM	#1
JC Maldini Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 490	Are You Unemployed Chart Pretty interesting to see how the actual number is manipulated. http://www.joerib.com/wp-content/upl...edgameshow.jpg __________________ JC Maldini Business Development ICQ: 223 643 Skype: jc_maldini

03-05-2010, 07:05 AM	#2
Iron Fist Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 23,400	Interesting.... __________________ i like waffles

03-05-2010, 07:16 AM	#3
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 94,352	You can't blame 'em for crunching their numbers... __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.

03-05-2010, 12:48 PM	#8
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	Not really anything new, it's always been this way. Statistically it's a wash.. which isn't factored into that graph. People that get benefits cut off or they end, often end up getting jobs. It may not be full time, it might be cash under the table, or it could be a real job, but all of those balances aren't added back in either - they can't be tracked. So it's better, to use the active unemployment numbers as a gauge of how things are going and keep the unknown out of the numbers. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

03-05-2010, 12:56 PM	#9
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Silly as usual from them __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-05-2010, 07:21 AM	#4
BIGTYMER Junior Achiever Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Walled Garden Posts: 17,066	I'd expect nothing less from government.

03-05-2010, 09:16 AM	#6
kush Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 3,382	Yeah it's a bunch of crap how it's reported. Not a true representation.

03-05-2010, 03:01 PM	#11
Cyber Fucker Hmm Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: On an endless road around the world for rock and roll. Posts: 12,642	hehe... funny stuff __________________