View Single Post
Old 03-05-2010, 01:00 PM  
kush
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
Not really anything new, it's always been this way.

Statistically it's a wash.. which isn't factored into that graph. People that get benefits cut off or they end, often end up getting jobs. It may not be full time, it might be cash under the table, or it could be a real job, but all of those balances aren't added back in either - they can't be tracked.

So it's better, to use the active unemployment numbers as a gauge of how things are going and keep the unknown out of the numbers.
Huh?

I'm no economist - but how is NOT factoring in the underemployed or discouraged/given-up workers a better representation of how things are going?
kush is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote