GideonGallery, GideonGallery, GideonGallery

[majortom]

I personaly use the GideonGallery, GideonGallery, GideonGallery time "extended?"Time shifting theory ...Might not exist..but after a few "stout beer testing....for science" inebriation I would swear it does.....

Well. in my life time I'm pretty sure I will see EVERYTHING I ever wanted to see on the interweb, from a friend's place or a Chinese hotel local TV feed, I will see just about EVERY movie (and more) ever done between 1900 to 2050.


So basically, I don't have to pay for anything..It's all free, because by accident or not I will see it SOMEWHERE SOME TIME.
Becasue I pay for my UBC asia cable shit any holywood movie is bound to be there some time in the future...so I already PAYED for it. that I can look at it this week or (normaly
in two years} when realized for tv..but I'm Time shifting...

Ok ...sorry for the disturbance...my beers did not time shift my drunkenness...should I pay now...or time shift it ...and get free beers....?

Ratatouille and patates sautees + cabernet sauvignon....not time shifting this one..

Love my wife..
see ya

[PornMD]

I don't think it works like Beetlejuice.

[sicone]

Clearly you need to stop drinking beer and move on to Tequila

[Mr. Cool Ice]

Originally Posted by PornMD

I don't think it works like Beetlejuice.

Beetlejuice

[Iron Fist]

Originally Posted by sicone

Clearly you need to stop drinking beer and move on to Tequila

[iSpyCams]

wtf is a gideongallery? Google was not as helpful as I had hoped, and wikipedia has no entry.

[tranza]

[L-Pink]

Time-shifting explained for GFY'ers:

If you fuck a hooker once you can fuck her anytime. Once you pay for her pussy you can fuck her anytime. You can also share her with friends that have paid for pussy if they share their paid for pussy with you. This can also apply to butt-holes if that was part of the original deal.

Note: This does not apply to ex-wife pussy no matter how much your alimony payments are.


.

[candyflip]

While you might not think it or like that it's true, the guy actually DOES know what he's talking about.

[TheDoc]

What a great example of a person being sold something (for free) when they are actually paying for a service.

Free out sells paid, a 100x over.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by majortom

I personaly use the GideonGallery, GideonGallery, GideonGallery time "extended?"Time shifting theory ...Might not exist..but after a few "stout beer testing....for science" inebriation I would swear it does.....

Well. in my life time I'm pretty sure I will see EVERYTHING I ever wanted to see on the interweb, from a friend's place or a Chinese hotel local TV feed, I will see just about EVERY movie (and more) ever done between 1900 to 2050.


So basically, I don't have to pay for anything..It's all free, because by accident or not I will see it SOMEWHERE SOME TIME.
Becasue I pay for my UBC asia cable shit any holywood movie is bound to be there some time in the future...so I already PAYED for it. that I can look at it this week or (normaly
in two years} when realized for tv..but I'm Time shifting...

Ok ...sorry for the disturbance...my beers did not time shift my drunkenness...should I pay now...or time shift it ...and get free beers....?

Ratatouille and patates sautees + cabernet sauvignon....not time shifting this one..

Love my wife..
see ya

you have to buy a right/given a right to view FIRST before you can timeshift it
so your arugement is a complete misrepresentation of what i said.

Other than that (everything being wrong) you got it just right.

[Darkland]

Originally Posted by Mr. Cool Ice

Beetlejuice

Beetlejuice

[Davy]

Is gideongallery the Anal Hobbit?

[CurrentlySober]

Originally Posted by Davy

Is gideongallery the Anal Hobbit?

A.H is J.D.L


I know thats incorrect, but I thought I'd say it, just to add to the confusion!

[Phallus Fondue]

like said by others the gideon guy is 100% correct in most all copyright debates i have seen him post on here and get bashed for. i can get he may just be a whipping boy because you personally do not like the laws, can not wrap your heads around how in the hell it works the way he says considering it seems like theft and is often used as theft. still does not make it wrong though, many laws are also very weird and or twisted that way, so all i can say is do not kill the messenger and ignore his posts if you do not agree with what he says about copyright. still not sure, plop down a couple hundred bucks and have a copyright attorney explain it to you. nothing has changed for awhile now and unless the supreme court reverses itself do not expect it to.

i however do not get his ad bug ideas, unless he has posted how and what they are and how i could use them. i am pretty sure i could not do product placement like some shows are doing now thanks to dvr's and other technology. i also do not get his other ideas for making money using other tricks he has and again i would appreciate a link if he has ever posted the list of all the ways, and how.

[candyflip]

Originally Posted by Phallus Fondue

i however do not get his ad bug ideas, unless he has posted how and what they are and how i could use them. i am pretty sure i could not do product placement like some shows are doing now thanks to dvr's and other technology. i also do not get his other ideas for making money using other tricks he has and again i would appreciate a link if he has ever posted the list of all the ways, and how.

I'm pretty sure the ad bugs he refers to are the "watermark" type animated ads you see in what some channels are running over the entire bottom right or left of their shows. In most cases now, they're just promoting their own new shows.

I could be wrong though. Maybe he'll be back to explain.

[Machete_]

Originally Posted by Phallus Fondue

like said by others the gideon guy is 100% correct in most all copyright debates i have seen him post on here and get bashed for. i can get he may just be a whipping boy because you personally do not like the laws, can not wrap your heads around how in the hell it works the way he says considering it seems like theft and is often used as theft. still does not make it wrong though, many laws are also very weird and or twisted that way, so all i can say is do not kill the messenger and ignore his posts if you do not agree with what he says about copyright. still not sure, plop down a couple hundred bucks and have a copyright attorney explain it to you. nothing has changed for awhile now and unless the supreme court reverses itself do not expect it to.

i however do not get his ad bug ideas, unless he has posted how and what they are and how i could use them. i am pretty sure i could not do product placement like some shows are doing now thanks to dvr's and other technology. i also do not get his other ideas for making money using other tricks he has and again i would appreciate a link if he has ever posted the list of all the ways, and how.

hi gideongallery's fake nick

[potter]

Originally Posted by Phallus Fondue

like said by others the gideon guy is 100% correct in most all copyright debates i have seen him post on here and get bashed for. i can get he may just be a whipping boy because you personally do not like the laws, can not wrap your heads around how in the hell it works the way he says considering it seems like theft and is often used as theft. still does not make it wrong though, many laws are also very weird and or twisted that way, so all i can say is do not kill the messenger and ignore his posts if you do not agree with what he says about copyright. still not sure, plop down a couple hundred bucks and have a copyright attorney explain it to you. nothing has changed for awhile now and unless the supreme court reverses itself do not expect it to.

spot on.

[Phallus Fondue]

Originally Posted by KrisH

hi gideongallery's fake nick

why would i be anyones fake nick? is it because i am almost 100% sure that what i have read of his about actual copyright during the past couple of months i lurked and after i finally had my account approved.
i have also told people to stop responding to him in the streaming content 10 page thread, suppose i would tell others to ignore me if i lived for debating like it seems he does? heck he seems to go out of his way to post in such threads to get people to argue with him. i also think the last thing he would need is some unknown username trying to make others think he is right when it is very obvious that he does not care what you think of him or his thoughts, he just keeps hammering away with anyone who responds to him.

i just happen to own content. i also have treated what i do as a business since day one. primarly because it was supposed to support me in college as my income. i got concerned with theft like i am sure all other content owners have. i also saw that tube sites, torrent sites, and such were growing at an alarming rate. i had my general attorney refer me to a copyright lawyer who explained it to me. i went in thinking that it was theft plain and simple. found out it was way more complicated and in simple text the majority of what he has said jives up with what i was told.

curious if you also think the candyflip guy is also a fake nick? he also thinks what gideon says is correct. does he not have any others that also think he is correct around here? has anyone else paid for a consult with such an attorney to get information on copyright cases? some of you must have, i have to imagine most of you use lawyers for your business since we are in adult which can get prosecuted at anytime.

now can anyone else answer the other questions i had about gideon. i would like to see where he has posted on how to utilize/make ad bugs or other ways to generate money so at least i can try them, even if you all think he is full of shit. so where are they posted?

[Machete_]

Originally Posted by Phallus Fondue

why would i be anyones fake nick? is it because i am almost 100% sure that what i have read of his about actual copyright during the past couple of months i lurked and after i finally had my account approved.
i have also told people to stop responding to him in the streaming content 10 page thread, suppose i would tell others to ignore me if i lived for debating like it seems he does? heck he seems to go out of his way to post in such threads to get people to argue with him. i also think the last thing he would need is some unknown username trying to make others think he is right when it is very obvious that he does not care what you think of him or his thoughts, he just keeps hammering away with anyone who responds to him.

i just happen to own content. i also have treated what i do as a business since day one. primarly because it was supposed to support me in college as my income. i got concerned with theft like i am sure all other content owners have. i also saw that tube sites, torrent sites, and such were growing at an alarming rate. i had my general attorney refer me to a copyright lawyer who explained it to me. i went in thinking that it was theft plain and simple. found out it was way more complicated and in simple text the majority of what he has said jives up with what i was told.

curious if you also think the candyflip guy is also a fake nick? he also thinks what gideon says is correct. does he not have any others that also think he is correct around here? has anyone else paid for a consult with such an attorney to get information on copyright cases? some of you must have, i have to imagine most of you use lawyers for your business since we are in adult which can get prosecuted at anytime.

now can anyone else answer the other questions i had about gideon. i would like to see where he has posted on how to utilize/make ad bugs or other ways to generate money so at least i can try them, even if you all think he is full of shit. so where are they posted?

candyflip is on my ignore because of the offencive images he keeps posting, so I wouldnt know.

But my is still you are his fake nick.

But dont worry, nobody care what the hell I think anyway

I'm just a clueless troll

[CrkMStanz]

Originally Posted by Phallus Fondue

like said by others the gideon guy is 100% correct in most all copyright debates i have seen him post on here and get bashed for. i can get he may just be a whipping boy because you personally do not like the laws, can not wrap your heads around how in the hell it works the way he says considering it seems like theft and is often used as theft. still does not make it wrong though, many laws are also very weird and or twisted that way, so all i can say is do not kill the messenger and ignore his posts if you do not agree with what he says about copyright. still not sure, plop down a couple hundred bucks and have a copyright attorney explain it to you. nothing has changed for awhile now and unless the supreme court reverses itself do not expect it to.

i however do not get his ad bug ideas, unless he has posted how and what they are and how i could use them. i am pretty sure i could not do product placement like some shows are doing now thanks to dvr's and other technology. i also do not get his other ideas for making money using other tricks he has and again i would appreciate a link if he has ever posted the list of all the ways, and how.

not going to argue your point, but I will argue the 100%

it is his interpretation and application of his 'facts' that we argue

he glorifies certain parts and belittles others, and in some cases, completely ignores aspects.

'backups' are allowed under the law as long as they are personal and private. this goes for vcr tapes, blank disks, clouds, torrents, dvr's, etc etc - but he ignores the text that defines the qualification personal and private.

regardless of your 'right to timeshift' and the media that you choose to 'timeshift' on - the qualification in the law is no 'public' broadcast or access. yet that is exactly what is happening thru the misuse of the technology

under fair use giddyboy quotes ...

Originally Posted by gideongallery

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes ....is not an infringement of copyright.

allow me to fill in the '...'

such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research,

for some reason he believes that publically available and accessable torrents of full porn siterips and full porn DVD rips (and of course software, hollywood, etc) are perfectly acceptable - and are really just an innocent 'backup'.

he tries to say that theres no real harm done to us producers.

he seems to want ALL digital content of any type (except his stuff, of course) to be free because it fits his personal marketing scheme and future profits.

he wants us to buy in to his free digital scheme so he can sell us his perfect technique and make those glorious profits ( )


this is a portion of why we argue with him - his copy/pastes may be accurate but his interpretations and visions are skewed.




and it just so darn much fun!!!!



(if you are giving it all away for free, what are those highly annoying 'branding bugs' going to sell? oh ya, dating memberships... )

[candyflip]

I'm on someone's ignore because I post offensive images? That's hardly my style, but if you say so.

[Twistys Tim]

I posted a reply to this thread in the distant future, and in an alternate reality -- but I made a very valid point!

[Phallus Fondue]

how someone backs up their own media is one thing and if i wanted to back up all of my porn via torrent which i would never do legally i can. i did buy it. i could also make it public too. just nobody legally would have any right to download it unless they also bought it.
i also do agree that the technology is primarly used for abuse and illegal sharing. not sure what he has said about that but it is what i feel and what i have seen. example i am pretty damn sure tens of thousands of people did not actually purchase the last version of photoshop the day it was released yet that many were sharing it. that is full on theft.
i am not sure about 100% of what he says as far as use etc. i just was speaking about how the actual copyright works along with such backups. i also feel there is indeed harm. that is why i went to a lawyer afterall. perhaps you may get some interested people via watermarks to visit your site, but otherwise it is harmfull.
oh correction. i have used a torrent in a test or two when i seeded it with some specially edited video that was more like a long comerical for my site. did not see enough type in increases to justify it so far. but then again it just takes me so long to edit such video and that is what really killed my idea of profitability.

[L-Pink]

CrkMStanz ....... Re: your last post


.

[Dirty Dane]

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Note: This does not apply to ex-wife pussy no matter how much your alimony payments are.

... but a taste of it is "fair use"

[CrkMStanz]

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

... but a taste of it is "fair use"

I think that would actually be timeshifting

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by KrisH

hi gideongallery's fake nick

have eric post the ip address info

i don't have fake nick period.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by CrkMStanz

not going to argue your point, but I will argue the 100%

it is his interpretation and application of his 'facts' that we argue

he glorifies certain parts and belittles others, and in some cases, completely ignores aspects.

'backups' are allowed under the law as long as they are personal and private. this goes for vcr tapes, blank disks, clouds, torrents, dvr's, etc etc - but he ignores the text that defines the qualification personal and private.

if backup were only valid if they were personal and private, then ghosting pc would be illegal. sms servers would be illegal. All the machines use a single SHARED image of the os and the applications.

I only belittle false arguements not facts.

regardless of your 'right to timeshift' and the media that you choose to 'timeshift' on - the qualification in the law is no 'public' broadcast or access. yet that is exactly what is happening thru the misuse of the technology

under fair use giddyboy quotes ...



allow me to fill in the '...'



for some reason he believes that publically available and accessable torrents of full porn siterips and full porn DVD rips (and of course software, hollywood, etc) are perfectly acceptable - and are really just an innocent 'backup'.

the rs-dvr case just established the difference between a public transmission and a public performance.

he tries to say that theres no real harm done to us producers.

i never said there was no harm, i said that the harm is completely compensated for when you actually properly leverage the technology.
Just like putting on your shit on cassettes and selling to people didn't eliminate the harm of the lost commercials revenue due to timeshifting.

There is a big difference between what i said and what you misrepresented me as saying.

he seems to want ALL digital content of any type (except his stuff, of course) to be free because it fits his personal marketing scheme and future profits.

he wants us to buy in to his free digital scheme so he can sell us his perfect technique and make those glorious profits ( )

i have repeatedly said that setting up a private tracker protects your content just as well as going streaming only. IT actually allows you to raise your price and get more sales, while being honest. Unlike streaming only where you have to lie to your customers/punish review sites if they expose your DRM.

the point is to shift the legal arguement to eliminate the DCMA "abuse" without taking away the fair use rights that safe harbor is designed to protect.

this is a portion of why we argue with him - his copy/pastes may be accurate but his interpretations and visions are skewed.

spend a couple of hundred buck, take one of the interpretations of mine to a real lawyer and ask them if that arguement is possible under the current laws.

i have never had a lawyer say it not possible. if it is possible you would have to bill out the hours to defeat that arguement. and the "thieves" as you say would be able to hide behind it.

and it just so darn much fun!!!!

i am glad you enjoy being schooled

(if you are giving it all away for free, what are those highly annoying 'branding bugs' going to sell? oh ya, dating memberships... )

totally and utterly clueless

"the torrent is to the porn industry what the boston stangler is to the women alone at night"

[Dirty Dane]

......................................______ __
..............................,.-'"...................``~.,
.......................,.-"..................................."-.,
...................,/..............................................." :,
...............,?........................... ...........................\,
............./.................................................. .........,}
.........../.................................................. ....,:`^`..}
........./.................................................. .,:"........./
........?.....__............................ .............:`.........../
......./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
...../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`. ......._/
....{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
.....((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
___.\`~,......"~.,....................`... ..}............../
......(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
....../.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.......\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
.......}.>-._\...................................|........... ...`=~-,
=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
.............`=~-,,.\,...............................\
..........................`:,,.............. .............`\..............__
...............................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
.................................._\........ ..._,-%.......`\
.............................,<`.._|_,-&``................`\

[candyflip]

I love these threads.

[babebuns]

anyone else gay