Quote:
Originally Posted by CrkMStanz
not going to argue your point, but I will argue the 100%
it is his interpretation and application of his 'facts' that we argue
he glorifies certain parts and belittles others, and in some cases, completely ignores aspects.
'backups' are allowed under the law as long as they are personal and private. this goes for vcr tapes, blank disks, clouds, torrents, dvr's, etc etc - but he ignores the text that defines the qualification personal and private.
|
if backup were only valid if they were personal and private, then ghosting pc would be illegal. sms servers would be illegal. All the machines use a single SHARED image of the os and the applications.
I only belittle false arguements not facts.
Quote:
regardless of your 'right to timeshift' and the media that you choose to 'timeshift' on - the qualification in the law is no 'public' broadcast or access. yet that is exactly what is happening thru the misuse of the technology
under fair use giddyboy quotes ...
allow me to fill in the '...'
for some reason he believes that publically available and accessable torrents of full porn siterips and full porn DVD rips (and of course software, hollywood, etc) are perfectly acceptable - and are really just an innocent 'backup'.
|
the rs-dvr case just established the difference between a public transmission and a public performance.
Quote:
|
he tries to say that theres no real harm done to us producers.
|
i never said there was no harm, i said that the harm is completely compensated for when you actually properly leverage the technology.
Just like putting on your shit on cassettes and selling to people didn't eliminate the harm of the lost commercials revenue due to timeshifting.
There is a big difference between what i said and what you misrepresented me as saying.
Quote:
he seems to want ALL digital content of any type (except his stuff, of course) to be free because it fits his personal marketing scheme and future profits.
he wants us to buy in to his free digital scheme so he can sell us his perfect technique and make those glorious profits (  )
|
i have repeatedly said that setting up a private tracker protects your content just as well as going streaming only. IT actually allows you to raise your price and get more sales, while being honest. Unlike streaming only where you have to lie to your customers/punish review sites if they expose your DRM.
the point is to shift the legal arguement to eliminate the DCMA "abuse" without taking away the fair use rights that safe harbor is designed to protect.
Quote:
|
this is a portion of why we argue with him - his copy/pastes may be accurate but his interpretations and visions are skewed.
|
spend a couple of hundred buck, take one of the interpretations of mine to a real lawyer and ask them if that arguement is possible under the current laws.
i have never had a lawyer say it not possible. if it is possible you would have to bill out the hours to defeat that arguement. and the "thieves" as you say would be able to hide behind it.
Quote:
|
and it just so darn much fun!!!!
|
i am glad you enjoy being schooled
Quote:
(if you are giving it all away for free, what are those highly annoying 'branding bugs' going to sell? oh ya, dating memberships...  )
|
totally and utterly clueless
"the torrent is to the porn industry what the boston stangler is to the women alone at night"