GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Max Hardcore Sentenced to 46 Months in Minimum Security (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=859342)

Ethersync 10-03-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 14850440)
hmm seems like relatively small fines and min security, isnt that similar to that milf who did time for some insider trading (martha stewart).

Martha Stewart? MILF? :error

TheSenator 10-03-2008 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CIVMatt (Post 14850332)
$700,000,000,000 spent to bailout groups who have destroyed this country, who say thanks and go about their business?. one guy expresses himself in a consensual situation in a cowboy hat and he goes to jail.

Some people are fuck up individuals.


Speaking the truth.



FREE MAX HARDCORE!

nikki99 10-03-2008 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 14851062)
Stagliano is facing similar charges for DVDs featuring milk enemas.

oh really? that's fucked up :Oh crap

DatingGold 10-03-2008 03:02 PM

I have a feeling the guy had complaints from the models to authorities that we don't know about. One model has already publicly said she filed a police report.

So that's what got the authorities on him. Then they threw him in jail based upon the outright sickness of some of the video's he made. One of the few I watched was very bad.

Bama 10-03-2008 03:05 PM

I'm no fan of Max. I think he's found a way to legally rape women much like prostitution is illegal but if I call up a girl and pay her to star in my movie it isn't considered prostitution.

Yes we sell fantasy but think about his scenes and the wording of the scripts. Incest, rape, violence against the women..

You'd have to be a complete moron to not see what niche he's catering to and he sure does enjoy the work. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck - well, it might be a swan but don't bitch when it gets shot during duck season..

I don't worry about "big brother" raiding my business because I give them no reason to. Max went around quacking and his ass got shot.

Pepsi and Coke are 2 huge dominating company's in the software industry. The could utterly destroy RC Cola but RC has been around since I was a kid and they do it by not pissing off Coke or Pepsi by doing something stupid - well folks, we're RC Cola.

One one side we have the government and on the other the Religious Right and if you don't want your head to be included in one big "whack-a-mole" don't go sticking it out like Max did.

tony286 10-03-2008 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14851139)
I agree. With all the pro porn laws passed by the dems I don't see how any of us can vote republican.

:winkwink:

Learn your history. You didn't see this happening during the clinton years. 2257 was changed under W people going to jail. Attorneys fired because they wouldnt go after adult porn cases. This is a republican admin.Are you that stuck in a political ideology that you are blind?
The marketers wanted to be right wing its their choice. You actually produce porn, please wake up.

Quentin 10-03-2008 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nation-x (Post 14850763)
I can't believe you stupid fucks are still defending this scumbag... I hope he thinks long and hard about his life. I watched a bunch of the stuff he filmed and some of it is just unreal... and clearly obscene. I will gladly accept your ridicule for standing up against shit like this. It's not porn... it's soft snuff. It's violence.

Do you feel the same way about hardcore BDSM? Prior to getting into this industry and researching the various niche markets, I would never have thought that some people actually want to have nails driven through their nipples, or would want to be suspended from hooks, or want to have their ass beaten with a paddle until it bleeds.... yet there's no shortage of people who PAY to have such things done to them.

I'm not suggesting the performers who work with Max all enjoy the experience -- merely that it isn't beyond the realm of possibility that they are OK with it, at least within the context of the video/scene being produced.

Any model who has performed with Max and feels that she was forced, induced or otherwise coerced to do something they did not want to do has the option of filing criminal charges against the man, or suing him in civil court. That's not what this case was about; this case was about violations of federal obscenity statutes, arguably the vaguest and worst defined statutes this country has to offer.

Connor from YNOT has a great analogy for how obscenity law works: it's like driving along a county road and seeing a sign that says "Speed Limit" but doesn't have any numbers on it. Then you get pulled over by a cop who says "Are you kidding me? Everybody in this town knows you have to stay under 25 on this road.... 30 tops... maybe 35.... well, it kind of depends I guess, but YOU were going 40 -- and we clearly can't have that."

Personally, I think that the most reasonable approach to obscenity law (other than eliminating it) would be to initially prosecute the material, and not the person(s) or company that produced it. Once a jury has deemed a video obscene, you could then make it a crime to sell that video. At least that way we would know whether or not a crime had been committed sometime before a jury comes back with a verdict....

When someone accused of robbing a bank goes on trial, for example, the only real question is "did they do it?" It just doesn't sit well with me to have a "crime" that is wholly dependent on context, and for which there is no objective criteria.

Adam_M 10-03-2008 03:34 PM

Sounds to me like the court has a lot more inside information then we do.

I hate the content that Max shoots and I'm sure I am not the only one, but if EVERY bit of paper work was in place I think the jail time is a bit over the top. If it pissed off the wrong people I am sure they could have found some girls at some time who are willing to stand against him and have some proof of something.

fuzebox 10-03-2008 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin (Post 14851325)
Connor from YNOT has a great analogy for how obscenity law works: it's like driving along a county road and seeing a sign that says "Speed Limit" but doesn't have any numbers on it. Then you get pulled over by a cop who says "Are you kidding me? Everybody in this town knows you have to stay under 25 on this road.... 30 tops... maybe 35.... well, it kind of depends I guess, but YOU were going 40 -- and we clearly can't have that."

I must have missed when he posted that, so thanks for reposting it. Great analogy :thumbsup

topnotch, standup guy 10-03-2008 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 14850817)
why does everybody on this board have to miss the point on everything?

there are OBSCENITY LAWS in the United States, always have been always will be,

Maybe not.

If all goes well in November this country might finally enter the 21st century :thumbsup

tony286 10-03-2008 04:05 PM

As vague as the law is if it was very specific 75 percent of the porn we have today wouldnt exist.

Quentin 10-03-2008 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 14851367)
I must have missed when he posted that, so thanks for reposting it. Great analogy :thumbsup

Indeed it is, although I'm not sure he has ever posted/published it anywhere; I heard him say it at an Internext seminar in Florida a few years back and thought it was pretty damn spot-on.

The Ghost 10-03-2008 04:39 PM

Anyone who is for this verdict should be ashamed of themselves.


If you are in the adult business and based out of the Unites States you should be livid and concerned for your future, regardless if you do softcore sites or hardcore. Hell, the surfers on GFY should freak out as well, since YOUR FREEDOMS are being taken away.


This is content produced by consenting adults for consenting adults. It should not be regulated. :2 cents:

stickyfingerz 10-03-2008 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ghost (Post 14851584)
Anyone who is for this verdict should be ashamed of themselves.


If you are in the adult business and based out of the Unites States you should be livid and concerned for your future, regardless if you do softcore sites or hardcore. Hell, the surfers on GFY should freak out as well, since YOUR FREEDOMS are being taken away.


This is content produced by consenting adults for consenting adults. It should not be regulated. :2 cents:

:thumbsup:thumbsup Funny a lot of the big people that yell "freedom of speech" and hate George Bush support this ruling.

Beaver Bob 10-03-2008 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ghost (Post 14851584)
Anyone who is for this verdict should be ashamed of themselves.


If you are in the adult business and based out of the Unites States you should be livid and concerned for your future, regardless if you do softcore sites or hardcore. Hell, the surfers on GFY should freak out as well, since YOUR FREEDOMS are being taken away.


This is content produced by consenting adults for consenting adults. It should not be regulated. :2 cents:

exactly. Where are they going to draw the line?

This should fucking scare the shit out of anyone who makes a living in this business.

wasteland 10-03-2008 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin (Post 14851325)
Do you feel the same way about hardcore BDSM? Prior to getting into this industry and researching the various niche markets, I would never have thought that some people actually want to have nails driven through their nipples, or would want to be suspended from hooks, or want to have their ass beaten with a paddle until it bleeds.... yet there's no shortage of people who PAY to have such things done to them.

I'm not suggesting the performers who work with Max all enjoy the experience -- merely that it isn't beyond the realm of possibility that they are OK with it, at least within the context of the video/scene being produced.

Any model who has performed with Max and feels that she was forced, induced or otherwise coerced to do something they did not want to do has the option of filing criminal charges against the man, or suing him in civil court. That's not what this case was about; this case was about violations of federal obscenity statutes, arguably the vaguest and worst defined statutes this country has to offer.

Connor from YNOT has a great analogy for how obscenity law works: it's like driving along a county road and seeing a sign that says "Speed Limit" but doesn't have any numbers on it. Then you get pulled over by a cop who says "Are you kidding me? Everybody in this town knows you have to stay under 25 on this road.... 30 tops... maybe 35.... well, it kind of depends I guess, but YOU were going 40 -- and we clearly can't have that."

Personally, I think that the most reasonable approach to obscenity law (other than eliminating it) would be to initially prosecute the material, and not the person(s) or company that produced it. Once a jury has deemed a video obscene, you could then make it a crime to sell that video. At least that way we would know whether or not a crime had been committed sometime before a jury comes back with a verdict....

When someone accused of robbing a bank goes on trial, for example, the only real question is "did they do it?" It just doesn't sit well with me to have a "crime" that is wholly dependent on context, and for which there is no objective criteria.

Well put, Q.....
The only bit of good news is that Paul is free on appeal. That's a bit of a surprise, as is the lenient sentencing, considering what the federal guidelines are.

Colin at Wasteland

DBS.US 10-03-2008 05:19 PM

The government is seeking forfeiture of the obscene films charged in the indictment, all gross profits from the distribution of the films, and all property used to facilitate the charged obscenity crimes, including Little?s residence in Altadena, Calif., and the Internet domain names maxhardcore.com, pissedonpornstars.com, and catalinaxxx.com.

Just Mike 10-03-2008 05:24 PM

wow Max is gonna get ripped to shreds in jail (Fed or no fed pen)

jakethedog 10-03-2008 05:43 PM

Obscenity is based on community standards... BUT maybe its me .. but the person who should be in jail is the actual DISTRIBUTOR of the content that was deemed obscene .. and it should have nothing to do with Max.. unless a legal release of liability was signed between Max and Jaded releasing Jaded of all legal distribution liability .. regarding the actual content .. it used to be common practice to IP block certain states that had laws regarding obscene material .. some states even have issues with interracial ..hell even vibrators are illegal in some states ..
In my opinion .. Jaded should be the one on their way to crowbar hotel .. Max albeit not loved by all and yes a little twisted is someone filling a market that their is a demand for .. meaning the market he is selling to falls within a demographic which via the internet should be considered to fall under a community within it's self ... therefore falling within their own community standards ruling on their on obscene materials .. ..
just my rant .. and oh ya .. fuck AlienQ you sure hate Max huh .. lol take a breath .. i can see the veins pounding in your temples from here....

latinasojourn 10-03-2008 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rorschach (Post 14850650)
If a girl is genuinely crying and is in obvious distress, the technicality of money having changed hands doesn't make it any less forced. If, while Max is throatfucking her so she can't breath, she begs him to stop and he doesn't, that's rape. Payment doesn't make the issue of coercion any less real in the moment... It just means the girl is getting paid to get raped, rather than getting raped and no money changing hands.

Max made content for degenerates and it tarnished the image and ability of webmasters to operate legitimate businesses.


thanks for articulating what most reasonable people understand.

stickyfingerz 10-03-2008 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by latinasojourn (Post 14851787)
thanks for articulating what most reasonable people understand.

Articulating it via wrong facts. Yes thanks for that...

50 sentences..

latinasojourn 10-03-2008 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rorschach (Post 14850650)
If a girl is genuinely crying and is in obvious distress, the technicality of money having changed hands doesn't make it any less forced. If, while Max is throatfucking her so she can't breath, she begs him to stop and he doesn't, that's rape. Payment doesn't make the issue of coercion any less real in the moment... It just means the girl is getting paid to get raped, rather than getting raped and no money changing hands.

Max made content for degenerates and it tarnished the image and ability of webmasters to operate legitimate businesses.


thanks for articulating what most reasonable people understand.

Redrob 10-03-2008 05:57 PM

I hope time passes easily for Max.

If he decides to stay in the industry when he gets out, I hope he doesn't repeat his past mistakes.

He really is a talented guy underneath all that rough reputation.

ppcwiz 10-03-2008 06:09 PM

his domains have been "forfeited"

...the end of max hardcore career?

i dono... but

wish him all the best though

we all deserve 2nd chances

met the guy once... lil on the weird side but wtf isnt this days and whos to judge?



doubt he will get out sooner then 4 yrs or be back in the biz

time to retire :(

Domain Name: MAXHARDCORE.COM
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
Name Server: JUSTICE2.USDOJ.GOV
Name Server: NS22.USDOJ.GOV
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 03-oct-2008

nico-t 10-03-2008 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14850701)
You saved me a few minutes of posting. hehe

Ill add that porn is FUCKING FANTASY. Im not a fan of his films either, but as long as it is all consensual so be it.

Fucking porn morality police crack me up.

why do you vote on neo cons again? :uhoh

directfiesta 10-03-2008 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 14851865)
why do you vote on neo cons again? :uhoh

Well, Sticky sees this case without partisanship. I think it is very mature of him, and if more people could see issue per issue, the usa would be much better off...

nico-t 10-03-2008 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14851879)
Well, Sticky sees this case without partisanship. I think it is very mature of him, and if more people could see issue per issue, the usa would be much better off...

I think sticky is brainwashed.

stickyfingerz 10-03-2008 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14851879)
Well, Sticky sees this case without partisanship. I think it is very mature of him, and if more people could see issue per issue, the usa would be much better off...

Im a very liberal conservative hehe. There are a lot of us. We aren't independent, and we aren't libertarian. We are different.

stickyfingerz 10-03-2008 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 14851905)
I think sticky is brainwashed.

If brainwashing worked on me I would hate porn, weed, and prostitution. I love them hehe.

chodadog 10-03-2008 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ (Post 14850567)
All of this is well documented.

Where? Source? Link?

Pete-KT 10-03-2008 07:21 PM

interesting

rayadp05 10-03-2008 07:40 PM

Will he serve his time in the state of Florida or in the state of California?....(since he is a California resident.) I guess he will serve his time in Florida since that was where the trial took place.

Drake 10-04-2008 02:38 AM

Mr. Max Hardcore meet Bubba.

SZNY 10-04-2008 04:14 PM

Personally I don't like this type of movies but this is some serious shit.

Again a new frontier defined by US justice / gov.

I wish him all the best.

marketsmart 10-04-2008 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14851915)
If brainwashing worked on me I would hate porn, weed, and prostitution. I love them hehe.

someday, i will convince you to become an independent... you are about 20% there...

Mr. Cool Ice 10-04-2008 04:35 PM

Honestly, if I was Max I would have moved to someplace in Europe a long time ago, given up my American citizenship and worked the way I wanted to. I mean, if he was THAT hell bent on shooting THAT type of content, he knew better than to do it from the former USA.

He wanted to buck the system and now the system bucked back.

andrej_NDC 10-04-2008 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxweekxx (Post 14850631)
omg all u fucking narrow minded fucks..

THE GIRLS AGREED/CONSENTED/WERE PAID.. seriously speaking

if i pay a girl money, and tell her im gonna shit on her, piss on her, then fuck her in the ass till she bleeds, and she agrees, how the fuck is that illegal??

people sell their body parts everytime for money.. its all about CONSENT.

Land of the free my ass?? IF i pay YOU AND YOU AGREE, WTF Is the problem.

RAPE is when you fuck a girl and she didnt consent, thast a crime.. now if i "pretend"to rape a girl but afterwards pay her, then wtf is the problem.. man fuck all you narrow minded fucks...republican sons of biatches

So if you AGREE to be killed, I pay you for it and then kill you, its all good? Just because you agreed?

andrej_NDC 10-04-2008 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14851915)
If brainwashing worked on me I would hate porn, weed, and prostitution. I love them hehe.

You need a brain to get brainwashed.

Mr. Cool Ice 10-04-2008 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC (Post 14854954)
So if you AGREE to be killed, I pay you for it and then kill you, its all good? Just because you agreed?

That's extreme.

I'm pretty sure all of Max's girls knew what they were getting into before they came to shoot and were paid well for it. If not and he just surprised them with all of that shit, then hang his hillbilly ass, but I don't think it went down that way.

andrej_NDC 10-04-2008 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Cool Ice (Post 14854965)
That's extreme.

I'm pretty sure all of Max's girls knew what they were getting into before they came to shoot and were paid well for it. If not and he just surprised them with all of that shit, then hang his hillbilly ass, but I don't think it went down that way.

If a girl has to say she had her first sex at the age of 3, doesn't matter if she agreed or not.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123