wonder why google images search seems to get really irrelevant by the fourth page - GoFuckYourself.com

d-null · 08-17-2008, 02:16 AM

It seems like the algorithm gets really bizarre and if the image isn't found on the first couple of pages, it has less and less of a chance because they start to show some really irrelevant images after that.

fallenmuffin · 08-17-2008, 02:42 AM

people name images some random shit also..

They're getting better they've replaced AI with humans http://images.google.com/imagelabeler/

seeandsee · 08-17-2008, 02:43 AM

We need more labelers

d-null · 08-17-2008, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fallenmuffin

people name images some random shit also..

They're getting better they've replaced AI with humans http://images.google.com/imagelabeler/

HOLY SHIT

I didn't know about that, and I think this could mark the beginning of a scary trend with the search engine in general

is google playing with the idea of adding volunteer human rating to the search engine algorithm? this could really change seo if they were to do that

fallenmuffin · 08-17-2008, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null

HOLY SHIT

I didn't know about that, and I think this could mark the beginning of a scary trend with the search engine in general

is google playing with the idea of adding volunteer human rating to the search engine algorithm? this could really change seo if they were to do that

They launched the image labeler like 2 years ago :P but now its linked on images.google.com so I'm guessing its starting to be used in rankings etc.

Emil · 08-17-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fallenmuffin

people name images some random shit also..

They're getting better they've replaced AI with humans http://images.google.com/imagelabeler/

Heh, nice first pic I got

bbm · 08-17-2008, 02:21 PM

How can you make it relevant?

Manowar · 08-17-2008, 02:23 PM

they can't do that for pornstars surely?

only a % would recognise who they were

signupdamnit · 08-17-2008, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null

It seems like the algorithm gets really bizarre and if the image isn't found on the first couple of pages, it has less and less of a chance because they start to show some really irrelevant images after that.

Probably because instead of shwing those with keywords in the image name, title of the html, or otherwise within the same block of text, it begins to show results which merely contain the keyword anywhere within the html itself.

CurrentlySober · 08-17-2008, 03:49 PM

I just labled all the images as 'poo'

I didnt score any points though :D

Iron Fist · 08-17-2008, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThatGuyInTheCorner

I just labled all the images as 'poo'

I didnt score any points though :D

That's why they use a random partner... if you don't match on any keywords then your suggestions or label is disregarded.

Agent 488 · 08-17-2008, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null

HOLY SHIT

I didn't know about that, and I think this could mark the beginning of a scary trend with the search engine in general

is google playing with the idea of adding volunteer human rating to the search engine algorithm? this could really change seo if they were to do that

already happening:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28...earch-results/

SomeCreep · 08-17-2008, 06:12 PM

Well you know what they say. People are strange, when you're a stranger.

08-17-2008, 02:16 AM	#1
d-null . . . Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: NY Posts: 13,724	wonder why google images search seems to get really irrelevant by the fourth page It seems like the algorithm gets really bizarre and if the image isn't found on the first couple of pages, it has less and less of a chance because they start to show some really irrelevant images after that. __________________ __________________ Looking for a custom TUBE SCRIPT that supports massive traffic, load balancing, billing support, and h264 encoding? Hit up Konrad! Looking for designs for your websites or custom tubesite design? Hit up Zuzana Designs Check out the #1 WordPress SEO Plugin: CyberSEO Suite

08-17-2008, 02:43 AM	#3
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	We need more labelers __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

08-17-2008, 03:49 PM	#10
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,646	I just labled all the images as 'poo' I didnt score any points though :D __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

08-17-2008, 06:12 PM	#13
SomeCreep :glugglug Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Where the Wild Things Are Posts: 26,118	Well you know what they say. People are strange, when you're a stranger. __________________ Webair Hosting I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

08-17-2008, 02:42 AM	#2
fallenmuffin Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 8,170	people name images some random shit also.. They're getting better they've replaced AI with humans http://images.google.com/imagelabeler/

08-17-2008, 02:21 PM	#7
bbm So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 3,710	How can you make it relevant?

08-17-2008, 02:23 PM	#8
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	they can't do that for pornstars surely? only a % would recognise who they were