wonder why google images search seems to get really irrelevant by the fourth page
 

It seems like the algorithm gets really bizarre and if the image isn't found on the first couple of pages, it has less and less of a chance because they start to show some really irrelevant images after that.

people name images some random shit also..

They're getting better they've replaced AI with humans http://images.google.com/imagelabeler/

We need more labelers

HOLY SHIT

I didn't know about that, and I think this could mark the beginning of a scary trend with the search engine in general

is google playing with the idea of adding volunteer human rating to the search engine algorithm? this could really change seo if they were to do that

They launched the image labeler like 2 years ago :P but now its linked on images.google.com so I'm guessing its starting to be used in rankings etc.

Heh, nice first pic I got

http://i36.tinypic.com/w2hee1.jpg

How can you make it relevant?

they can't do that for pornstars surely?

only a % would recognise who they were

Probably because instead of shwing those with keywords in the image name, title of the html, or otherwise within the same block of text, it begins to show results which merely contain the keyword anywhere within the html itself.

I just labled all the images as 'poo'

I didnt score any points though :D

That's why they use a random partner... if you don't match on any keywords then your suggestions or label is disregarded. :2 cents:

already happening:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28...earch-results/

Well you know what they say. People are strange, when you're a stranger.