So if I only use content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records? - GoFuckYourself.com

clickhappy · 07-14-2008, 07:16 AM

Is that right?
This is all mature content so theres no teens anyways, but overall if I use content made in 1994 or earlier then I dont need to provide records, right?

CurrentlySober · 07-14-2008, 08:14 AM

Where are you running your biz from USA or elswhere?

tranza · 07-14-2008, 10:20 AM

I didn't know about this!!!

Noe · 07-14-2008, 10:24 AM

Correct. The 2257 law was passed in 1995. Anything produced before that is considered exempt.

the Shemp · 07-14-2008, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy

Is that right?
This is all mature content so theres no teens anyways, but overall if I use content made in 1994 or earlier then I dont need to provide records, right?

i think its prior to July 3rd, 1995
you still need licenced content though, you cant just scan old skin mags...

Got Porn? · 07-14-2008, 10:29 AM

2257 does not apply to content made before July 3, 1995.

Got Porn? · 07-14-2008, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp

i think its prior to July 3rd, 1995
you still need licenced content though, you cant just scan old skin mags...

What he said

96ukssob · 07-14-2008, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Porn?

2257 does not apply to content made before July 3, 1995.

you probably just need records stating each picture, movie, etc was filmed or shot before 1995

Barefootsies · 07-14-2008, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy

So if I only use LICENSED content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records?

Correct.

clickhappy · 07-14-2008, 12:58 PM

Kick ass!
I have access to license a treasure trove of content made in the 80s.
fucking awesome

Tempest · 07-14-2008, 02:58 PM

It's funny everyone thinking you don't need 2257 if the content is older than the law... Consider this.. How are you going to prove it?? It's another fucked up part of 2257 that in order to be able to prove that 2257 doesn't apply, you need some documentation and record keeping that's pretty much required for the content it does apply to.

FightThisPatent · 07-14-2008, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest

It's funny everyone thinking you don't need 2257 if the content is older than the law... Consider this.. How are you going to prove it?? It's another fucked up part of 2257 that in order to be able to prove that 2257 doesn't apply, you need some documentation and record keeping that's pretty much required for the content it does apply to.

exactly, and how can u prove the model is not under 18?

then there is that copyright infringement issue if you can't prove the license and the content owner comes after you...

Fight the spanish inquisition!

07-14-2008, 07:16 AM	#1
clickhappy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 4,027	So if I only use content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records? Is that right? This is all mature content so theres no teens anyways, but overall if I use content made in 1994 or earlier then I dont need to provide records, right?

07-14-2008, 08:14 AM	#2
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,688	Where are you running your biz from USA or elswhere? __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

07-14-2008, 10:20 AM	#3
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	I didn't know about this!!! __________________ I'm just a newbie.

07-14-2008, 10:24 AM	#4
Noe Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,082	Correct. The 2257 law was passed in 1995. Anything produced before that is considered exempt. __________________ www.xxxcontentdirect.com www.extremefeeds.com ICQ: 169980934 [email protected]

07-14-2008, 10:29 AM	#6
Got Porn? Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Charlotte Posts: 1,264	2257 does not apply to content made before July 3, 1995. __________________ Demo Porn2Go's Plug-In Feeds 1st Month Free! No BW Fees! ICQ 303355427 [email protected] RIP TD

07-14-2008, 12:58 PM	#10
clickhappy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 4,027	Kick ass! I have access to license a treasure trove of content made in the 80s. fucking awesome

07-14-2008, 02:58 PM	#11
Tempest Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: West Coast, Canada. Posts: 10,217	It's funny everyone thinking you don't need 2257 if the content is older than the law... Consider this.. How are you going to prove it?? It's another fucked up part of 2257 that in order to be able to prove that 2257 doesn't apply, you need some documentation and record keeping that's pretty much required for the content it does apply to.