GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   So if I only use content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=841242)

clickhappy 07-14-2008 07:16 AM

So if I only use content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records?
 
Is that right?
This is all mature content so theres no teens anyways, but overall if I use content made in 1994 or earlier then I dont need to provide records, right?

CurrentlySober 07-14-2008 08:14 AM

Where are you running your biz from USA or elswhere?

tranza 07-14-2008 10:20 AM

I didn't know about this!!!

Noe 07-14-2008 10:24 AM

Correct. The 2257 law was passed in 1995. Anything produced before that is considered exempt.

the Shemp 07-14-2008 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 14457613)
Is that right?
This is all mature content so theres no teens anyways, but overall if I use content made in 1994 or earlier then I dont need to provide records, right?

i think its prior to July 3rd, 1995
you still need licenced content though, you cant just scan old skin mags...

Got Porn? 07-14-2008 10:29 AM

2257 does not apply to content made before July 3, 1995.

Got Porn? 07-14-2008 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp (Post 14458397)
i think its prior to July 3rd, 1995
you still need licenced content though, you cant just scan old skin mags...

What he said :2 cents:

96ukssob 07-14-2008 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Porn? (Post 14458402)
2257 does not apply to content made before July 3, 1995.

you probably just need records stating each picture, movie, etc was filmed or shot before 1995 :1orglaugh

Barefootsies 07-14-2008 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 14457613)
So if I only use LICENSED content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records?

Correct.

clickhappy 07-14-2008 12:58 PM

Kick ass!
I have access to license a treasure trove of content made in the 80s.
fucking awesome

Tempest 07-14-2008 02:58 PM

It's funny everyone thinking you don't need 2257 if the content is older than the law... Consider this.. How are you going to prove it?? It's another fucked up part of 2257 that in order to be able to prove that 2257 doesn't apply, you need some documentation and record keeping that's pretty much required for the content it does apply to.

FightThisPatent 07-14-2008 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 14459556)
It's funny everyone thinking you don't need 2257 if the content is older than the law... Consider this.. How are you going to prove it?? It's another fucked up part of 2257 that in order to be able to prove that 2257 doesn't apply, you need some documentation and record keeping that's pretty much required for the content it does apply to.



exactly, and how can u prove the model is not under 18?

then there is that copyright infringement issue if you can't prove the license and the content owner comes after you...


Fight the spanish inquisition!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123