Are you going to answer my questions or just keep pissing mate?

Taz is not a totalavs owner. He worked for one. And that one is malepassword.com, who I mentioned above, if you look.

I did not try to hide anything, I gave the urls to live sites not owned by me or any employees, etc. that people can check out and see for themselves if they work or not.

Hell, it looks a lot like YOUR site ampass.com works fine, from what I can see. I notice it is still using TotalAVS too.

It's what you can't see that's the problem. All the sites in AmateurPass are mine. Why? Because I can't let any other webmasters into the program since the stats don't work, the pay periods can't be ended, the random list of sites can't be randomized, the fraud checker doesn't work...should I go on?

All it is doing right now is granting access to my sites until my new backend is completed.

ok, I didnt realize you owned allwives.com and amateurwives.com and I saw those in your listings, I assumed you had other webmasters participating in ampass.com

You assumed wrong. If you would like to send me an email at either of those two domains I would be happy to answer it.

Jack, again I really am just trying to figure out why all these other sites I have posted are running fine, yet you had so many problems comparably. As I said, any large script will encounter some problems between servers, but the amount of problems you had was very uncommon to say the least. The other sites are running and as I said, you can check them yourself, they are fully functional live sites. Go look and see for yourself.

Like I said, what other people are running I have no idea.

You decided a month or so ago that you didn't want to rectify the situation, you would rather just ignore it so now it will come to these types of public displays I guess. If you someday decide you want to work it out, my email address has not changed. Until then, I'll be happy to let everyone know what my experience was.

Jack, Umm you said yourself that Ryan worked with you daily to rectify it. YOU locked him out of the server when he got taz to go look at the templates according to him.

Besides, I love public. All advertising is good advertising mate. No matter how hard you try to slam anyone here.

For some reason that last paragraph doesnt sound right. It sounds like you are trying to tell someone who paid $2500 for your script that since it seems to be working for a few others that it must be his fault.

Sure I dont know anything. All I know is that a few months back I saw the tavs code and db structure and it was garbage. The thing has a ton of issues with it and it should have never been sold in such an unstable state. I really dont think you want to argue the fact that you were aware of several of these issues well before tonight , you dont wanna look like a total liar. The issue is the script was very buggy (even though it may work like a charm with a ton of db structure and code changes on some servers as you say) and should have not been released. The least you could do is give the guy his money back for the script if you cant configure it to work on his server. I just cant believe that you sold a totally insecure version that was able to add usernames just by hitting a url for $2500. For $2500 commercial script things like that shouldnt be 'overlooked'. There were several other major issues such as the data not being backed up correctly if some unknown file permissions werent set correctly..... the list goes on. You claim that ryan is not your employee, if thats true then why would you have him doing support for your script? All this just doesnt add up to me.

Rory
:helpme

Incorrect again, William. Taz had access to my server for a few weeks and he tried to repair some of the problems your script had. He too said some of them were beyond his scope and I decided to have a completely new backend done from scratch. Once I made that decision, I removed the access from PerlCoders since they would no longer need to try and fix the script I had given up on.

Where do you get this information from? It's complete revisionist history!

Yeh, it did come across that way, and that is my bad. But the fact is I fail to see why out of over 20 sites using the exact same software and up and running that his is having so many problems. As I said, check the sites listed, its very simple... you type in the URL and make an account and try them out.

Ryan is not my employee. He runs adultdesignz.com and has his own customers. He has some of his customers get our scripts that he is familliar with and he does his own installs/troubleshooting.

No Jack, I got it from this:


<raulk> i had taz go in and do template work and fix what he could then blaze got a new coder that said the sript was shit and locked us out


-- edit --
bloody board shows < and > as html so the nick didnt register. blah.

I was not Ryan's customer, I was yours. When I bought the script from PerlCoders I was given Ryan as the person I would be dealing with. You guys are the ones who had him install the script for me, matter of fact you guys had him answering questions about what the script could do before I even bought it!

You can say he wasn't your employee but he's the person your company gave me to deal with.

Should the fat that some other people may have a working script make me feel any better? I spent $2500 and got one that didn't. Was it a different version? A bad install? I have no idea. All i know is mine didn't work...even after your guy worked on it for a couple months.

This is getting very tiresome. If you don't want to work it out and you like it public, I'll just make it all plain and public tomorrow. Then you can see what Ryan and Taz and other users really have to say about TAVS.

Jack, I never said it should make you feel better. I did however say that I can see no reason why it would work on so many other sites and yet you had so many problems. Have I said you did NOT have problems? No.

You seem surprised that I finally decided to end it and remove Ryan's access.

If you had a plumber come over every day and keep fixing a leaky pipe and it kept on leaking would you say, hey he's here every day he's doing great work? No, you'd move on and take care of it some other way. After a while I finally realized the script was crap.

OK, so you know I had serious problems with it. You know it was worked on for months with no result. Why are you not willing to make it right?

Jack, what did I say in my last email to you?
paste it if you like. I said "Ryan was authorized to deal with you to make you happy".

Did I not??

Ryan can do repair work. After a couple months we were way past that.

Ryan can't issue monetary discounts. (At least I assume he can't since he's not your employee.) You can...so what do you say? Make it right or not?

Jack, No he was not an employee, he has not been for years, at that time he was my CC processor. He handled the money.

And as I stated in my email, He was authorize to make you happy. I did not know your situation, he did. Who better to deal with you?

You are jumping the wrong guy here mate.

Well, I paid PerlCoders. That's you. That's who I'm talking to now.

Do you want to make it right and credit me back for the script or not?

You have the authority to do it...why not show everyone how PerlCoders handles customer service.

Jack, This is obviously just a pissing match for you. I told you months ago who had authorization to make you happy. You have not once tried dealing with that person obviously. I have told you yet again who could make you happy.

Have a nice day.

ps: go to internet.com and ask to talk to the ceo or president about getting a refund on something you got from them. What do they say (if you even get to talk to them)? They tell you who to talk to to amend things.

LOL! When the going get's tough, eh William?

So you are saying Ryan has the authorization to make financial credits for PerlCoders? Or are you just telling me go get Ryan to work on the script for a couple more months?

Like I said, this is obviously just a pissing match to you.

Not a pissing match at all. Are you going to answer my question?

Are you saying Ryan can make financial credits for PerlCoders or are you telling me to have him go back and work on the scripts some more?

Well, I think that pretty much illustrates my point.

You know the script had major problems.
You know Ryan tried to fix it for months with no results.
You refuse to do anything but tell me to have Ryan keep trying.

After a couple months, I think anyone in their right mind would have given up on your script.

This is what you get when you buy from a company like PerlCoders.

Hey i am going to throw my two cents in here weather it means much to anyone or not there where problems with the script yes and to my knowlge to this date they where all fixed but one.. I know of at the time blazes site was being worked on yes there where problem there two that where not just template problems.. the periodend has been fixed todate and to my knowlege.. the last know problem is being fixed or has been fixed by now... the idsignup.cgi problem is there if you are using the old ccbill prossessing way ... in the new ccbill i do not know of the problem being there... I am just trying to set facts striagh here too i can not comment to much as i do not know all detail of anything... I am not takeing side in this .. but i do know is blaze did not ever get the script to work for his site ..

Well nuclei whats the verdict here? I for one am interested to know how PC will handle this. You said that any publicity is good right? Why dont you publicize the resolution of this? Or are you going to say that even though you own or have an affiliation with PC and even though the script was bought from and through PC that blaze is going to have to look elsewhere for resolution? I find it hard to believe that a person who isnt an employee would have the power to resolve these types of issues. If for whatever reason after months of trying the thing wouldnt work I would expect PC to give the guy a refund. That is one of the major problems with some people in the 'adult' industry , they dont wanna take responsibility for anything and they just try and pass it along and let someone else deal with it. BTW as may know if you do a little research on my name with your company that I have spent at least $5000 with PC in the past. Never again will a single dime go your way. Hope you like the publicity.

Rory
:helpme

Also you said something about getverified.com so I went and looked. Spent about 3 secodns there before I realized that there had obviously been some modification to the script they are running. Just look at the names of the files.... show me a /idsignup_postcookie.cgi file on ampass.com. So yes it does work I assume, but not without modification.

Rory
:helpme

This thread rocks!!!!

well well well :P

I was going to do it but here it goes:

I think if anything what perlcoders needs to do is interact with thier customers. If it was my business and I sold someone 12,000 dollars worth of scripts, design etc. , I would make sure they are happy. Im not telling William how to do business but in this industry things change. It would be beneficial to someone that buys a script, provides version updates and so on. This would more than likely provide excellent customer retention and make the script owners very happy. :thumbsup

A email from perlcoders saying hey we have updated TAVS once and awhile would be kick ass.

Dont get me wrong , I like William.

Cant we all get along :feels-hot

by the way

send me your galleries


www.tgpdoggy.com

:Graucho :Graucho

At one point I was considering trying PC's AVS script. I decided not to go in the AVS direction, and I am certainly pleased that I did not purchase the script. After reading this thread I will not ever consider purchasing any of PC's scripts. I am thinking that they have shot themselves in the foot big time.

Hi, Thought I'd give my two cents too as people are throwing my name around. I did start with the original tavs script almost 3 years ago, but after looking at the script's results, and lack of even basic AVS features, had to have pretty much the whole thing rewritten. A lot of the features I asked for were written into subsequent versions and the pro version I believe, but I hear from many owners of the script that the pro is as problematic as the regular version. I can only tell of my own experience though.


Hope this helps.
James

welcome to the board Jim

lol:ak47: :ak47: :Sadam

From a guy who started with Fortran in 1967, written and sold Pascal (and then Delphi) programs, to one who is still learning Perl and MySQL, my surprise to this thread is that it ever went this far. Nuclei should have never let the flames get so high, and this thing should have been settled behind the scenes.

Sorry Nuclei, but you seem to be at least the PR part of PC, if not one of the principals with full authority, and it should be your job to keep the customer satisfied and all the dirty laundry off the thread. If you're not one in authority to resolve the issue, you should not have been replying.

I really don't like to criticize anyone, but I have say I would be very hesitant to ever do any business with PC.

- sorry, guess the publicity isn't so great afterall? -

:stoned

HAHAHA
this thread rocks x 2

And believe what this thread showed is just the visible face of the iceberg.
I am also an unlucky TotalAVS custommer.
I am actually asking for a refund, but i don't know why i have actually no answer. Maybe because i tried during one year to made this script work and never get in !!!
Anyway, Mister BLAZE can you contact me on sherkhan_ AT hotmail.com ? I need some to hear some advice from you, as i understood you are an american citizen you can certainly lead me to the good administration i should contact in case of they refuse my refund . It will be truly nice from you.
I don't know why but even they state in their licence policies :"
Refunds No Refund will be issued when the script is installed and working properly as stated in the scripts information pages, scripts that are installed and working properly are the extent of our responsibility."
Just the script allow direct link to content from expired custommer, a bit annoying for an AVS system !!!!
I tried 10 times to get support but you know i am an idiot custommer and it is not the problem of the script, it is because i am too idiot to make it work correctly !!! Now i have the feeling they won't refund my money and i don't want let that happened !
At last for the one said about the "Soon selling of right" stayed almost one year on their site, you are RIGHT. I even guess they deleted it since this thread. When i bought the script James, yeah the same that answered here, from getverified.com, was almost near to buy the rights of this script. Hehehe, he was very very very very slow to decide that he shouldn't !!!

So please BLAZE contact me, or others custommer in case they won't refund my money. What are the legal actions i can take against them ?

But please, don't interpretate my words in the wrong way, maybe they are truly competent for others, but i just saw that i wasn't alone to think the same think about perlcoders. I just advice to read 2 times this thread for their future custommer. What happens to us can happen to you.


Warmest regards,
SherKhan.

Hey william I think that he is pretty much calling bullshit on you so you may wanna go back and edit getverified.com from the list of happy fully functioning TAVS owners dont ya think? Just a thought lol, I about fell out of my chair when I read that guys post, hahah funny shit. Did you not expect anyone to come and call BS on you or what? LOL :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Rory
:helpme

Well, William...I guess it looks like I'm not the only one who had problems with TAVS. Even your examples of happy customers are calling you out on it! LOL!

Are you going to take care of some customer service and credit some $ back or are you just going to ignore this thread and pretend you never saw it? Hopefully you are a smart enough businessman to know what the right decision is.

My bet is he will not reappear. :winkwink:

I got $12.49 on him coming back and making some stupid excuse. :1orglaugh

Rory
:helpme