at what resolution do you consider images to be "high-resolution"?? - GoFuckYourself.com

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 04-26-2008, 09:42 AM

i see alot of places talking about how the have high resolution images that are say 650px by 1000px. then i see other that are like 1050px by 1400px. Reading reviews i see they often have a "hi res: yes / no" heading in their summaries too. With monitors reaching higher and higher resolutions, at what point is an image considered high resolution now?

obviously i consider a 1050x1400px image to be high resolution, but is 600x1000px cuttingit for this description anymore?

woj · 04-26-2008, 09:49 AM

nah, 600x1000 is crap, that may have been "hi-res" 8 years ago, but certainly not now...

Yoni · 04-26-2008, 09:50 AM

1600x1200

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 04-26-2008, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

nah, 600x1000 is crap, that may have been "hi-res" 8 years ago, but certainly not now...

i'd fully agree with you on that

Bourd · 04-26-2008, 10:53 AM

1024px is the low-res version on many sites. As a reviewer, I consider 1500px and more to be hi-res...

payd2purv · 04-26-2008, 04:05 PM

this thread makes me lawlz.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 04-26-2008, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bourd

1024px is the low-res version on many sites. As a reviewer, I consider 1500px and more to be hi-res...

makes sense. so how many years until 1500px is low res? haha. judging by the majority of the sologirl sites i've been in, most are a long fucking way from running hi-res images.

rowan · 04-26-2008, 11:44 PM

Some of the art nude sites are now offering 5000 or 6000px images to members. Basically native resolution straight out of a high end camera.

rowan · 04-26-2008, 11:54 PM

BTW 6000px would be enough for a decent quality print (ie: you could examine it closely like a postcard sized print) of at least 24" in size

Dropping to 40ppi (billboard resolution) your print would be over 12 feet in size

PenisFace · 04-27-2008, 12:34 AM

I have a 22" widescreen monitor. I consider an image high-res if it gets auto-resized in IE. On my other monitor, anything that fits in my 22" screen is massive and annoying :D

leetd · 04-27-2008, 03:20 AM

at least 2000px+ x 1000px+

GrouchyAdmin · 04-27-2008, 03:22 AM

1024x768 @ 60Hz (interlaced)

04-26-2008, 09:42 AM	#1
Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life (felis madjewicus) Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: In Mom & Dad's Basement Posts: 20,368	at what resolution do you consider images to be "high-resolution"?? i see alot of places talking about how the have high resolution images that are say 650px by 1000px. then i see other that are like 1050px by 1400px. Reading reviews i see they often have a "hi res: yes / no" heading in their summaries too. With monitors reaching higher and higher resolutions, at what point is an image considered high resolution now? obviously i consider a 1050x1400px image to be high resolution, but is 600x1000px cuttingit for this description anymore?

04-26-2008, 09:49 AM	#2
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	nah, 600x1000 is crap, that may have been "hi-res" 8 years ago, but certainly not now... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

04-26-2008, 09:50 AM	#3
Yoni Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 846	1600x1200 __________________ See my latest works on twitter.com/yonidesign

04-26-2008, 10:53 AM	#5
Bourd Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Quebec city Posts: 88	1024px is the low-res version on many sites. As a reviewer, I consider 1500px and more to be hi-res... __________________ Vanilla TGP v2.0: Make your life easier and your site bigger!

04-26-2008, 04:05 PM	#6
payd2purv Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Toronto Posts: 2,727	this thread makes me lawlz. __________________

04-26-2008, 11:44 PM	#8
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	Some of the art nude sites are now offering 5000 or 6000px images to members. Basically native resolution straight out of a high end camera.

04-26-2008, 11:54 PM	#9
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	BTW 6000px would be enough for a decent quality print (ie: you could examine it closely like a postcard sized print) of at least 24" in size Dropping to 40ppi (billboard resolution) your print would be over 12 feet in size

04-27-2008, 12:34 AM	#10
PenisFace Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Vancouver Posts: 3,774	I have a 22" widescreen monitor. I consider an image high-res if it gets auto-resized in IE. On my other monitor, anything that fits in my 22" screen is massive and annoying :D __________________ Need custom blog posts or articles? Hit me up: Blog And Article Writer Yes, I can do any kind of custom orders, too! ICQ: 641204000

04-27-2008, 03:20 AM	#11
leetd Registered User Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 84	at least 2000px+ x 1000px+

04-27-2008, 03:22 AM	#12
GrouchyAdmin Now choke yourself! Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 12,085	1024x768 @ 60Hz (interlaced) __________________ AIM: GrouchyGfy