at what resolution do you consider images to be "high-resolution"??

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life
    (felis madjewicus)
    • Jul 2006
    • 20368
    #1

    at what resolution do you consider images to be "high-resolution"??

    i see alot of places talking about how the have high resolution images that are say 650px by 1000px. then i see other that are like 1050px by 1400px. Reading reviews i see they often have a "hi res: yes / no" heading in their summaries too. With monitors reaching higher and higher resolutions, at what point is an image considered high resolution now?

    obviously i consider a 1050x1400px image to be high resolution, but is 600x1000px cuttingit for this description anymore?
    Tags: None
    • woj
      <&(©¿©)&>
      • Jul 2002
      • 47880
      #2
      nah, 600x1000 is crap, that may have been "hi-res" 8 years ago, but certainly not now...
      Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
      Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
      Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

        Comment

        • Yoni
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2003
          • 846
          #3
          1600x1200
          See my latest works on twitter.com/yonidesign

            Comment

            • Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life
              (felis madjewicus)
              • Jul 2006
              • 20368
              #4
              Originally posted by woj
              nah, 600x1000 is crap, that may have been "hi-res" 8 years ago, but certainly not now...
              i'd fully agree with you on that

                Comment

                • Bourd
                  Confirmed User
                  • Nov 2002
                  • 88
                  #5
                  1024px is the low-res version on many sites. As a reviewer, I consider 1500px and more to be hi-res...
                  Vanilla TGP v2.0: Make your life easier and your site bigger!

                    Comment

                    • payd2purv
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 2727
                      #6
                      this thread makes me lawlz.

                        Comment

                        • Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life
                          (felis madjewicus)
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 20368
                          #7
                          Originally posted by Bourd
                          1024px is the low-res version on many sites. As a reviewer, I consider 1500px and more to be hi-res...
                          makes sense. so how many years until 1500px is low res? haha. judging by the majority of the sologirl sites i've been in, most are a long fucking way from running hi-res images.

                            Comment

                            • rowan
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Mar 2002
                              • 17393
                              #8
                              Some of the art nude sites are now offering 5000 or 6000px images to members. Basically native resolution straight out of a high end camera.

                                Comment

                                • rowan
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Mar 2002
                                  • 17393
                                  #9
                                  BTW 6000px would be enough for a decent quality print (ie: you could examine it closely like a postcard sized print) of at least 24" in size

                                  Dropping to 40ppi (billboard resolution) your print would be over 12 feet in size

                                    Comment

                                    • PenisFace
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Oct 2003
                                      • 3774
                                      #10
                                      I have a 22" widescreen monitor. I consider an image high-res if it gets auto-resized in IE. On my other monitor, anything that fits in my 22" screen is massive and annoying :D
                                      Need custom blog posts or articles? Hit me up: Blog And Article Writer

                                      Yes, I can do any kind of custom orders, too!

                                      ICQ: 641204000

                                        Comment

                                        • leetd
                                          Registered User
                                          • Nov 2007
                                          • 84
                                          #11
                                          at least 2000px+ x 1000px+

                                            Comment

                                            • GrouchyAdmin
                                              Now choke yourself!
                                              • Apr 2006
                                              • 12085
                                              #12
                                              1024x768 @ 60Hz (interlaced)

                                                Comment

                                                Previous template Next
                                                Working...