GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Are Tube Sites Really a Big Threat to the Biz? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=796740)

BFT3K 01-06-2008 12:57 PM

I just can't comprehend how many people are under the impression that these new tube sites, which are now offering HOURS of FREE content in ALL niche catagories are fine for business.

I hope I'm wrong, as I will be introducing new sites soon myself.

I guess time will tell, but my bet is we see a lot of adult profit drop off in 2008.

CleopatraoftheNile 01-06-2008 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 13614362)
I just can't comprehend how many people are under the impression that these new tube sites, which are now offering HOURS of FREE content in ALL niche catagories are fine for business.

I hope I'm wrong, as I will be introducing new sites soon myself.

I guess time will tell, but my bet is we see a lot of adult profit drop off in 2008.

I am not entirely sure they are fine for business but the point to using a site that accesses millions of people quickly should be used as a portal to find paying clientele to divert to a pay site. What I put out on tube sites contains no nudity but is used as a teaser to bring them to join my site. Now I could have gone the route of throwing out there obscene amounts of footage to compete with others but my policy is if you want to see more....you pay:)
it may not always bring me the business I desire but we have to think as business individuals...do what is right for your business regardless of what the majority are doing. I will give you an example...this doesn't hold true in all cases but it is something I have witnessed. The DVD industry...when companies would get into a price battle at shows to sell more DVD's...people were selling them at one time for $20 a piece and customers bought them. Then a price war began, 2 for $20, then 3 for $10, then 5 for $10, I have even seen them as low as $1 a piece, after that came FREE PORN FOR EVERYONE! ALL companies lost money. I didn't compete with that but I sold only a few at my regular price and took my product home. Everyone else had virtually no more product but no money either:) I would rather be in my position so I can rethink my business and find another way to make my money on my product:)
I see similarities here....free footage on the internet takes sales away but if you find a way to work these angles to bring you business, you may salvage enough to do well. You need to keep reinventing who you are, expand and diversify. Use the tubes to provide you with a great marketing angle so that the footage you do release up there can have a little twist to it and because it is different...curiosity will kill the cat...You will get your paying customers still.

Maybe I am wrong but giving the cow away for free in order to sell the milk doesn't work either we all know that

Cleopatra of the Nile

Andy Servers4Less 01-06-2008 01:36 PM

Good for sites like AFF and Fling... as for paysites should be interesting to see how everyone adapts IMO.

BergyK 01-06-2008 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 13605481)
Actually I have read that the average masterbation session is 12 minutes long - not 2 to 5 as you have stated above. The point is, tube sites train surfers to believe porn is free online. If you think this is helpfull to the industry you are very wrong.

MGPs and TGPs do not provide full length clips, nor do they hide the watermarks of the clips they offer. In fact their real purpose is to redirect traffic to the pay sites, and ultimately increase membership sales.

Tube sites do not redirect to membership sites, and since most offer very lengthy clips surfers just stay there, wack off, and call it a day. They do not bother to then go to a pay site afterwards. That doesn't even make sense. Why buy the cow when the milk is free?

Some people will argue that MGPs and TGPs are free porn, but most will agree that they are traffic builders for pay sites more than they are free porn sites, very unlike the tubes (legal content or otherwise).

Some people will state that you can find free porn via file-sharing sites, password-sharing forums, etc. and although that is also true, those methods take time, and a bit of research, etc. These new tube sites take all of the effort out of locating free porn, therefore simplifying, and greatly expanding the availability of free porn, therefore cutting into the revenue of porn-for-pay.

It is really quite clear. If you want to make money in the adult biz you have to see the harm the tube sites present. No surprises. Tube sites absolutely do more harm than good.

Ask yourself this question: How do the tube sites HELP the adult industry?

If you can't answer that, then guess what?....

I truly agree with you:thumbsup

BFT3K 01-06-2008 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CleopatraoftheNile (Post 13614477)
I am not entirely sure they are fine for business but the point to using a site that accesses millions of people quickly should be used as a portal to find paying clientele to divert to a pay site. What I put out on tube sites contains no nudity but is used as a teaser to bring them to join my site. Now I could have gone the route of throwing out there obscene amounts of footage to compete with others but my policy is if you want to see more....you pay:) it may not always bring me the business I desire but we have to think as business individuals...do what is right for your business regardless of what the majority are doing. I will give you an example...this doesn't hold true in all cases but it is something I have witnessed. The DVD industry...when companies would get into a price battle at shows to sell more DVD's...people were selling them at one time for $20 a piece and customers bought them. Then a price war began, 2 for $20, then 3 for $10, then 5 for $10, I have even seen them as low as $1 a piece, after that came FREE PORN FOR EVERYONE! ALL companies lost money. I didn't compete with that but I sold only a few at my regular price and took my product home. Everyone else had virtually no more product but no money either:) I would rather be in my position so I can rethink my business and find another way to make my money on my product:)
I see similarities here....free footage on the internet takes sales away but if you find a way to work these angles to bring you business, you may salvage enough to do well. You need to keep reinventing who you are, expand and diversify. Use the tubes to provide you with a great marketing angle so that the footage you do release up there can have a little twist to it and because it is different...curiosity will kill the cat...You will get your paying customers still.

Maybe I am wrong but giving the cow away for free in order to sell the milk doesn't work either we all know that

Cleopatra of the Nile

Very nice comments Cleopatra. Measured, upbeat, and intelligent response to the issue. Hopefully logic will prevail.

maxjohan 01-06-2008 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zorgman (Post 13612122)
Rui, I can only asume if he's making more money then business is good. How can it about to die off?

If I make 1,000,000 last year and 1,180,000 this year -- business is good.

Ratios were shittier but he worked double as hard or triple?

Get it now? :winkwink:

Zorgman 01-07-2008 12:16 AM

Work smarter, not harder. He's doing something wrong. :winkwink:

CleopatraoftheNile 01-07-2008 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RegUser (Post 13611462)
and can somebody please explain what the hell happened to 2257 regulations?
why they are not applicable to tube sites?
of late every tom dick harry and their dog(s) have started tube sites as they cost less than 50 bucks to start. They make their pennies everyday while industry is about to die off

there should be no reason why the 2257 doesn't apply to everyone using nude material in any format on any medium but as I am sure you are aware. It has only been severely enforced in the Porn Valley where it is knowingly evident that porn is shot at certain locations.

It is very unfair that because legitimate companies shooting porn make it very well known and adhere to regulations such as these, law enforcement is likely to come down harder on the companies who have already legitimised themselves. Seen it happen too many times.

Too many people get away with it if the tube site isn't labelled as a porn site, then you will see that it is less likely expected to list custodian of records nor have the 2257 disclaimer available. Don't know how many tube sites this applies to....I haven't seen them all only a few.

CleopatraoftheNile 01-07-2008 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 13616289)
Very nice comments Cleopatra. Measured, upbeat, and intelligent response to the issue. Hopefully logic will prevail.

well thank you my friend... I do try :)

Paul Markham 01-07-2008 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diligent (Post 13613514)
One step the industry could take to keep things going smoothly for everyone, from big programs to smaller affiliates, could be to gradually lower the price for site memberships ALONG WITH membership length.

2 weeks access for $15-20, 1 week access for $10 and keep 1-3 days access at around $5.

I'm sure many affiliates thinks this sounds ridiculous, or dangerous.. and will until they see their amount of joins increase instead! :2 cents:

We recently put in a 3 day trial, joins sky rocketed by a factor of 10 yes it was that much. The amazing thing was the number of people who join for 3 days and immediately cancel. They only want 3 days and not going to take more. Affiliates can stick to only selling $30 joins, but they will be the losers.

Rebills have climbed so I can see the traffic is falling into different categories. (A) The guys who join for the 30 day membership had dipped a bit, (B) Rebills have climbed very steady and now make up most of the income, (C) the big number who want 3 days and not going to join for

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. In the future this will read "You can send traffic to a site but you can't make them join."

The only reason you're losing sales to Tube sites is Tube sites are appealing more to the surfers than paysites. What paysites have to do is win back the surfer. Closing Tube sites is not an option.

RK 01-07-2008 06:04 AM

There is something that everyone in this thread seem to miss.
How do adult tube sites make money?

They make money by sending sales to paysites.
If you are a paysite owner, you make money from tube sites.
If you are an affiliate, you get screwed.

Same old.

Remember, the tube sites are no there to distribute free porn. Their primary and only goal is to make money.

avcmodels 01-07-2008 03:52 PM

My humble opinion is that in a way we should thank to all the free forms of adult sites because :

-they filter people by age and country origin (14-20 years are no real money value to the paysites;China ,India ,countries that just started to discover the full potential of internet stop in these websites and eat their bandwith)

-they educate people about porn and they help them to discover their inner secret niche (Untill 23-25years ,maybe even more , a person is not fully sexually matured if he doesen't have lots of sexual experiences;Getting online and seeing all kind of things for free ,they discover that they like a niche more then other and they start digging for the origin of that niche)

-they increase the masturbation time ( you see now 5 minutes of this , tommorow 10 minutes of something else and so on untill ,to get off ,you will need something really specific)

As a conclusion i think that in the end , as someone stated before , the future belongs to focused niche paysites and if you have a general type of porn to put it "out of the box" type like bigsausagepizza.com .I m sure many of us remeber of it and what I know fo sure is that they made a ton of cash with what ?simple , normal girls and a few big cocks in a damn pizza.

As a final conclusion ,i consider that it would be far away better without them ,but at least look at the bright side .On the long run content producers are the winners and if you don't win from this ,it only means that you don't know how to market your shit .Be agressive, don't let the webmasters promote flawless movies (no marketing like a tshirt or a banner etc), and verify all the time who's using your content.

Cheers and if you don't agree with me be gentle and come with logical arguments...

Gasper 01-08-2008 04:30 AM

bump :winkwink:

Paul Markham 01-08-2008 05:28 AM

A very positive post. Thanks.

I think you might have a very good point as well. Rather than sitting and moaning about Tube sites and how they are stealing our business we need to be looking at how we use them in a constructive manner.

What we have to do is make sure we offer a viable alternative to Tube sites. They are restricted by the quality and speed of video they can deliver. They also tend to be a mix of anything people will upload and often very short.

So can we sell to a Tube surfer? It's not will he buy, it's can we sell. He will and has to buy something from them to pay for their existence.

BFT3K 01-08-2008 09:26 AM

Over the past few weeks I have been bookmarking every tube site I have seen that offers videos over 5 minutes in length. Without much effort at all I now have nearly a dozen such sites favorited, and whenever I feel the need to "rub one out" guess how much I pay?

I won't list the url's, as I don't care to assisit in advertising these sites, but I am very certain I am not alone in my discoveries.

To be fair, as a webmaster myself I don't really spend much on porn anyway (other than production and hosting costs, etc.) but I did start this thread based upon my own experience with tube sites.

If I can find lengthy free porn in ANY niche I am in the mood for, without much effort at all, then I am sure I am not alone...

ichauch 01-08-2008 11:37 AM

If there was a way to monetize tube sites, vivid would have snatched it for the lousy $20 million that they (and other companies) were offered for youporn.

BFT3K 01-08-2008 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ichauch (Post 13624108)
If there was a way to monetize tube sites, vivid would have snatched it for the lousy $20 million that they (and other companies) were offered for youporn.

Yeah, I read that artcle too. It seemed like the Vivid guys couldn't figure out the business sense behind the free tube sites either, so at least I'm not totally alone on this.

How are your sales doing today guys? 2008 starting out with a bang?

Gasper 01-08-2008 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 13624554)
Yeah, I read that artcle too. It seemed like the Vivid guys couldn't figure out the business sense behind the free tube sites either, so at least I'm not totally alone on this.

How are your sales doing today guys? 2008 starting out with a bang?

January started VERY slow.. but it's getting better by the day.. today - average

fucking tube sites :winkwink::1orglaugh

Marshal 01-08-2008 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 13599187)
yes they are a huge threat but half of the replies you'll get will be "adapt or get the fuck out of this biz"

i second that! :thumbsup

BFT3K 01-08-2008 02:40 PM

Yeah, adapt to free porn for all surfers, or get the fuck out out of the biz!

Brilliant statement! Reminds me of the Underpants Gnomes on South Park.

The Underpants Gnomes are a community of underground gnomes who steal underpants, notably from Tweek.

The Underpants gnomes have a three-phase business plan, consisting of:

1. Collect Underpants
2. ha?
3. Profit

None of the gnomes actually know what the second phase is, and all of them assume that someone else within the organization does.

The new 2008 online porn three-phase business plan, consists of:

1. Give Away Tons of Free Porn
2. ha?
3. Profit

Tell me again how only freeloaders visit free porn sites?

Alexa Ranking: 37...
http://alexa.com/data/details/traffi...ls/youporn.com

Alexa Ranking: 101...
http://alexa.com/data/details/traffi...ls/redtube.com

DirtyProfits 01-26-2008 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diligent (Post 13601759)
There are still people going to the cinemas, or buying original DVD's...

Out of all those that do pay these ways... I don't think more than a few % thought
"Alright, that's it! It's too damn expensive, so I'm just gonna download instead and watch then on my monitor!"

People who *can* afford it, prefer cinema/DVD's, because they feel the alternative is of inferior quality, or an inferior experience.

So the movie-industry really hasn't *lost* significantly to freeloaders, those who sit at home and download instead of paying, are cheapskates who were'nt fueling
the movie industry much anyways.

Now, here's where Adult online becomes an analogy to this:

This shit is inevitable, there will always be a 'cheapskate "market" ' in parallell with a *real* market, anywhere & everywhere...
TGP's were only the beginning of this in the history & sense of Adult online, now it's going further with Tubes and the likes.

Adapting (and surviving the changes) basically means heavier product branding + better catering to the customers needs/desires... Better/more quality, service, and nicheing.

:Oh crap

Let me explain you the difference between the mainstream and adult movie industry and the consequences of piracy for each.
First of all, the reason why people go to cinemas is mainly because it is a social event. I do not know anybody who goes to watch a movie in a cinema alone. People go see even really crap movies at the cinema just to hang out with their friends and enjoy the talk before and after the movie.

People who buy a dvd buy it most of the time because they enjoyed the movie they watched at the cinema very much and want to be able and see it again at home, or watch "behind the scenes" parts.
A second reason why people buy dvds is because they missed the movie when it was running in the cinemas and do not want to wait until it comes on television. You are right that they enjoy the high quality in comparison to pirated downloaded movies but I do not think that is the main reason the buy the dvd. If they had the knowledge where to find and how to download the movie without spending too much time to find a reliable source, many of them probably would.

Concerning the adult industry, your statement about "inferior quality, or an inferior experience" does not really match. There are by far less adult movie cinemas and they are not even socially accepted. The main reason to watch an adult movie is to masturbate, and most people prefer to masturbate in privacy. Unfortunately hardly anybody goes to a cinema to watch a pornographic movie therefore. Moreover you do not plan to watch a pornographic movie but it is more a spontaneous decision. Watching an adult movie is (yet) not a social event neither. You do not meet with your friends at 7pm in front of the blue movie theatre in the redlight district, or did I miss out something thus far?
The good old days of renting adult dvds at your local movie store are gone too. The internet offers 24/7 access to everything you want, and downloading a movie within a couple of minutes is for most people the prefered option, compared to ordering a dvd and having to wait for days or weeks.

I absolutely do not agree with you on the cheapskate and real market. There is only one market. Many people might have the attitude to not pay for anything especially porn but this is only the consequence of our industry's fault to provide too much for free. Back in the days where picture posts (not tgps) existed basically everybody browsing those sites was a potential customer. I could write much more but I am going to take a shower now.

In conclusion, the mainstream and adult movie industry are two different shoes that serve completely different needs. I honestly think that most of your arguements do not hold true. By the way, there are no tube sites for mainstream movies yet and do you really think Warner Bros. etc. would accept the fact that people could watch all Hollywood productions for free on the internet and of course they would be glad to advertise one those sites :winkwink:

xmas13 01-26-2008 09:08 AM

I'm thinking of starting a tube site with 100% home made porn.

But i still can't figure out how to make money. :winkwink:

testpie 01-26-2008 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmas13 (Post 13700347)
I'm thinking of starting a tube site with 100% home made porn.

But i still can't figure out how to make money. :winkwink:

Even if you are being sarcastic, I was actually wondering how you can make money on tube sites besides advertising? I've been thinking about this for the better part of a fortnight, and nothing has struck me as a viable alternative; yet when I consider that most people coming to a tube site will just want to logon and jack off, I can't think what the appeal of any advertisement to them would be, as an advertisement would surely require some sort of financial transaction, which isn't going to be all that attractive when you've got your dick in one hand and the other on the keyboard.

Or am I wrong?

Zorgman 01-26-2008 09:28 AM

Maybe let them watch 10-20 video clips and then they have to signup for something to get to watch the rest. At least then you might have their email address or combine 2 services with 1.

Gasper 01-26-2008 11:46 AM

I think tube sites will save this industry

Ninja Frank 02-09-2008 03:34 AM

Sales have decreased since 2004 not because of tube sites, but because everyones tours and themes are identical. How many times can you watch a morphed version of the * Hunter (insert niche for *)... its the same shit over and over.

a fake pickup, blowjob, fucking, cumshot.

50 of the same big tit big ass sites, 50 of the same blowjob sites.

People stop paying for the same shit after awhile. Also everyone gives away ALL ACCESS PASS... which sucks balls.

If i join BigNaturals.com, ive already seen every one of their other sites, making it useless for me to join any of their other sites in the future. If a surfer has joined one site, theyve seen them all.

Paysites need to give their members things that tubes can't.
- Higher Quality Files (HD)
- Download to Disk (tubes don't do this)
- Download in every fucking format you can think of (ipod)

evolve.

Iron Fist 02-09-2008 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diligent (Post 13601759)
I do see what You guys are saying, but let me give an example of another sub-industry within the broad "Entertainment" sector:

Movies.

There are still people going to the cinemas, or buying original DVD's...

Doesn't matter what you talk about there's always someone who will freeload it. I used to know a guy a long time back who used to do "double features" - that was his terminology.

Essentially, he would pay for a movie, watch it and then walk into another theater and catch another movie on the house. He did this ALOT and even I went to a couple with him. The thing he said is to look confident - like you belong in this theater and no one will question you. He was right.

dixirdotcom 02-09-2008 08:01 AM

It depends on how you look at it. People are only getting a few minutes at most of porn and not the whole video. I'd prefer to have the whole video rather than short clips. I don't think it's killing anyone and it can actually help increase site visitors for the owners. Everyone will have a different opinion on it though. That's just my 2 cents!

Blazed 02-09-2008 08:09 AM

The time you have to worry about tubes is when/if they start dominating the search results. The only reason surfers still go to link lists and mgps for porn is because they dont know about the tubes, when they start ranking for keywords tubes will be the norm for users.

bausch 02-09-2008 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyProfits (Post 13700317)
:Oh crap

I do not know anybody who goes to watch a movie in a cinema alone

I actually always go to the movies alone. I have been to the movies more by myself then with someone else. I go to the movies to watch a MOVIE not to socialize.

d-null 02-09-2008 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blazed (Post 13758671)
The time you have to worry about tubes is when/if they start dominating the search results. The only reason surfers still go to link lists and mgps for porn is because they dont know about the tubes, when they start ranking for keywords tubes will be the norm for users.

dominating the search results is what the stolen content FORUMS are working on right now, they will dominate the search engine traffic...... the tube sites will get the repeat type in and word of mouth and viral traffic, but only the few biggest ones will thrive, the rest will be of no real consequence

CrkMStanz 02-09-2008 02:29 PM

You want to stop Tube sites...?

You don't fight them on the basis of 'stolen content' or 'loss of profits' or 'copyright infringement' - if mainstream hollywood can't accomplish this we won't either.

You fight them on the basis that this is Pornography, and it is being served up for free to underaged internet users

You send lists of tube site URLs to every religious activist group and political wannabe there is... demanding that they put an end to this 'corruption of our youth' (throw a child-porn comment or two in there for good measure).

Then you get some action - and they pay the legal bills and do all the work for us.

You're welcome


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123