Fox has "Limited Studio Space" for Ron Paul - GoFuckYourself.com

Socks · 01-01-2008, 01:58 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/....ap/index.html

I hope you all have Limited Patience for this Mediaocracy in your amazing Demockracy.

Note how the article sums it up as "no big deal"

L-Pink · 01-01-2008, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/....ap/index.html

I hope you all have Limited Patience for this Mediaocracy in your amazing Demockracy.

Go blow a moose.

Socks · 01-01-2008, 02:02 PM

Go blow yourself tranny.

L-Pink · 01-01-2008, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks

Go blow yourself tranny.

tranny?

Socks · 01-01-2008, 02:05 PM

Sorry maybe I misunderstood, were those not your nips in that photo? Or are you the photographer?

L-Pink · 01-01-2008, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks

Sorry maybe I misunderstood, were those not your nips in that photo? Or are you the photographer?

I'm the photographer and I'm just kidding about the moose. (find something easier to catch)

Socks · 01-01-2008, 02:09 PM

ok ok, comments redacted.. ;P

I thought we was friends anyways. ;)

L-Pink · 01-01-2008, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks

ok ok, comments redacted.. ;P

I thought we was friends anyways. ;)

Yea, I just have a punchy sense of humor sometimes.

It would be nice if there was a test to take before applying for the top job in the US. This whole political process is crazy.

L-Pink · 01-01-2008, 02:37 PM

That whole article makes no sense. Politicians have the right by audit to purchase local media, tv/radio, at the lowest rates charged advertisers the year of elections. If a local merchant buys a 60 sec radio spot during drive time for 10 dollars then political parties are entitled to buy campaign spots for that same rate.

Local privately owned media outlets have to be very careful what they charge local advertisers during the year because politicians can take that low rate and purchase time during the busy fall retail season ruining the stations profits. This is supposed to keep a level field with costs the same for each candidate regardless of a stations political leanings.

But a major tv channel can set their own candidates? That makes little sense.

01-01-2008, 01:58 PM	#1
Socks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto Posts: 8,475	Fox has "Limited Studio Space" for Ron Paul http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/....ap/index.html I hope you all have Limited Patience for this Mediaocracy in your amazing Demockracy. Note how the article sums it up as "no big deal" Last edited by Socks; 01-01-2008 at 02:01 PM..

01-01-2008, 02:02 PM	#3
Socks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto Posts: 8,475	Go blow yourself tranny.

01-01-2008, 02:05 PM	#5
Socks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto Posts: 8,475	Sorry maybe I misunderstood, were those not your nips in that photo? Or are you the photographer?

01-01-2008, 02:09 PM	#7
Socks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto Posts: 8,475	ok ok, comments redacted.. ;P I thought we was friends anyways. ;)

01-01-2008, 02:37 PM	#9
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	That whole article makes no sense. Politicians have the right by audit to purchase local media, tv/radio, at the lowest rates charged advertisers the year of elections. If a local merchant buys a 60 sec radio spot during drive time for 10 dollars then political parties are entitled to buy campaign spots for that same rate. Local privately owned media outlets have to be very careful what they charge local advertisers during the year because politicians can take that low rate and purchase time during the busy fall retail season ruining the stations profits. This is supposed to keep a level field with costs the same for each candidate regardless of a stations political leanings. But a major tv channel can set their own candidates? That makes little sense.