I'm starting to wonder if people may have under-estimated MinusOneBit - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

BluMedia · 12-27-2007, 03:41 AM

I under-estimated you because you were damn good last night.

rogue employee · 12-27-2007, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

Of course, these clients would then be called too, which means they'd be publicly identified as people that knew about this problem, but didn't inform the industry because, as OC3 has claimed in their threads, they were afraid of John and threats of lawsuits and/or license revocation. If so, would that amount to claims of extortion or coercion?

I think It's called blackmailing.

SinisterStudios · 12-27-2007, 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

So is it best to get rid of the rotten apples or hide them?

Thats calling the kettle black isnt it, you have admitted numerous times that you have "Magic Join Links" or as most people call it, shaving.

People with huge skeletons in their closet shouldnt be be talking about other peoples issues. But then again Paul has never known when to keep his mouth shut, and has lost alot of business because of that.

Barefootsies · 12-27-2007, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

Your right, ibill owing a ton of money went to a show nothing happened, .xxx went to a show nothing happened, acacia came to a show nothing happened. Im pretty sure piratebay could come to a show and nothing would happen.

commonsense · 12-27-2007, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

At least someone is keeping it on the map. It seems a lot of sponsors have decided the cost of moving from NATS is not worth it and will say anything to get this off the map.

I have asked some very specific questions that John will not answer, will not or cannot?

Questions related to exactly what did he fix when it became obvious his system was compromised and how. It took posters here minutes to find the problem in NATS, the login, times, IP and other things. So what fixing did TMM carry out?

John claims he warned "at risk clients", seen any come forward to verify this?
Yet it appears he did threaten people who were going to make it public.
Did he change the system to make the IP locking down default or did he keep the compromised system default?

I'm not sure about this but maybe others can tell me. Did John tell people who complained unique email addresses were getting spammed that the problem was in the end or not. In the last three months? Remember it's after he "fixed" the problem.

It's a reflection on us.

All of your posturing on the issue is fascinating. For a guy who flat out lies about how your sites do (i.e. magic join links), you've been very vocal about this.

BVF · 12-27-2007, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

I so don't toss heterosexual salad.

Breeders don't know how to keep themselves clean back there.

You gotta get in the shower and spread and the cheeks and let that water get all up in there...a simple run across with the cloth won't do it.

12-27-2007, 03:41 AM	#51
BluMedia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Colorado Posts: 3,973	I under-estimated you because you were damn good last night. __________________ IntenseCash - If you can't convert us then you might want to look for a new job . BrokeStraightBoys.com converting 1:124 stats counted by Nats