![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 4 8 15 16 23 42
Posts: 4,444
|
Yes and no. Google doesn't like CSS, but google hates Frames, so using CSS in the only way if you don't want a 1998 style site....but it's not like CSS itself does any good for rankings.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,465
|
A good clean CSS site is easier for the bots to decode. There are less tags on the pages, less likely for their to be a coding error that confuses the bots, and therefore makes it easier for the bots to find your actual content (text).
That is the theory, anyway. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,143
|
no... not really StarkReality... but by keeping your CSS simple and straight forwards like RawAlex had pointed out; is a good thing... Do you know how to create a website without any tables using only CSS/html?
Later, .
__________________
sig too big |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
|
Why would Google not like CSS ? CSS is progressive and I'd hope so is Google.
Use an external CSS file, keep your pages clean. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Begas
Posts: 9,162
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
So fuckin' bored
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,386
|
At least google parses it.
__________________
Obey the Cowgod |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 9,266
|
not only Google likes CSS (well, at least doesn't dislike it) but if you know what you're doing you can use XHTML for better SE positioning by using a few tricks.
Personally, the last time I used the tag <table> in a page must have been like 1 year ago and never had any problem with Google. If anything, things went better.
__________________
This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 579
|
google read css for a hidden text styles
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 9,266
|
indeed. yet there are ways to do it without being penalized
![]()
__________________
This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,400
|
Yeah well I use CSS *and* TABLES and Google doesn't care!
![]()
__________________
i like waffles |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |