Google is changing their algorithm. - GoFuckYourself.com

spacedog · 08-29-2007, 09:26 AM

Just read a SEO newsletter & Google is changing their algorithm & will penalize websites that have many one way links. IN & OUT

beta-tester · 08-29-2007, 09:28 AM

source of such (dis)information?

ztik · 08-29-2007, 09:32 AM

Im not sure about for search. I know just 2 days ago they changed it for PPC which is similiar to what you are saying. This was only for the top position(s).

spacedog · 08-29-2007, 09:32 AM

http://www.sitepronews.com/archives/2007/aug/29.html

Seems they want to penalize sites that have outbound links to sites not linking back?

StuartD · 08-29-2007, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog

http://www.sitepronews.com/archives/2007/aug/29.html

Seems they want to penalize sites that have outbound links to sites not linking back?

So they'll blacklist anyone with reciprocal links and penalize anyone with links to sites that don't link back?

Genius!

Wolfy · 08-29-2007, 09:36 AM

back to the top I go!!!!

TheDoc · 08-29-2007, 09:40 AM

Google seems to think they are the Internet authority. They want to penalize others for the exact same thing they do.

Forkbeard · 08-29-2007, 09:43 AM

Very opinionated article, kinda lacking in evidence though.

Read it again and imagine that every sentence starts "I think that..." and you'll do better.

StuartD · 08-29-2007, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Google seems to think they are the Internet authority. They want to penalize others for the exact same thing they do.

Well, it's their search engine... they can stop listing everyone today if they wanted to and close up the search page.
In that respect, yes, they are the authority... of their own possession.

You can start your own search engine if you like, and pick and choose who you list, you penalize and hell, you don't even have to give a reason or explain it.

Klen · 08-29-2007, 09:53 AM

Fuck the google,soon there will be new search engine which will beat google.I mean they FORBID buying links and FORBID link exchanges.How the fuck else you will get backlinks?

DickShoke · 08-29-2007, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD

So they'll blacklist anyone with reciprocal links and penalize anyone with links to sites that don't link back?

Genius!

HAHAHA..they should just ban the whole internet!

cherrylula · 08-29-2007, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD

So they'll blacklist anyone with reciprocal links and penalize anyone with links to sites that don't link back?

Genius!

oh noooos, the internets are falling

TheDoc · 08-29-2007, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD

Well, it's their search engine... they can stop listing everyone today if they wanted to and close up the search page.
In that respect, yes, they are the authority... of their own possession.

You can start your own search engine if you like, and pick and choose who you list, you penalize and hell, you don't even have to give a reason or explain it.

They can make up any rules they want, but the more they do the more people move away. History will repeat itself like it has so many times before.

scottybuzz · 08-29-2007, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

Fuck the google,soon there will be new search engine which will beat google.I mean they FORBID buying links and FORBID link exchanges.How the fuck else you will get backlinks?

hmm, maybe by building a decent site, that people want to link to?????????

tony286 · 08-29-2007, 10:05 AM

Why would they make that rule?

headless ghost · 08-29-2007, 10:10 AM

google = bitch in heat
webmasters = male dogs all hoping for a chance to hit it
me = LMAO ROFL

fluffygrrl · 08-29-2007, 10:11 AM

http://pagebull.com/

I've moved a while back.

JD · 08-29-2007, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog

http://www.sitepronews.com/archives/2007/aug/29.html

Seems they want to penalize sites that have outbound links to sites not linking back?

just read that... and to be honest... it's so full of shit i think I can see the O's turning brown inside...

At the end he suggests piling up on 1 way incoming links... But earlier he said 1 way OUTgoing links is bad "you'll be haemorrhaging Page Rank" so why the hell would anyone give you 1 way links?

when there's some sort of evidence to back this shit up I MIGHT believe it, but until then it's just /another/ "guru" trying to scare people into hiring him for seo or to get views on his ads (that are all over the place btw)

jonesonyou · 08-29-2007, 10:15 AM

bad for google

Klen · 08-29-2007, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz

hmm, maybe by building a decent site, that people want to link to?????????

They start to penalize even that.For example,statcounter.com had pr10 thanks to a lot of users who used their free counter and every user gived them automaticly backlink.Now they are pr9 beacuse google didnt like to see commmercial site to be pr10.

scottybuzz · 08-29-2007, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

They start to penalize even that.For example,statcounter.com had pr10 thanks to a lot of users who used their free counter and every user gived them automaticly backlink.Now they are pr9 beacuse google didnt like to see commmercial site to be pr10.

hmm didnt realise that..., but i really dont see google dieing any time soon to be honest, oh but wait wait wait, edit - surely if they had the free counter, then they -had- to link back, therefore thats a forced link back. no wonder google popped it back down

SmokeyTheBear · 08-29-2007, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz

hmm, maybe by building a decent site, that people want to link to?????????

umm did you miss what he was saying . one way links would be penalized.. thus building a decent site would get you penalized.

I cant see this theory being valid ..

RawAlex · 08-29-2007, 11:38 AM

I can't wait to see CNN hit PR0 and get kicked out of the SERPs.

Emil · 08-29-2007, 12:02 PM

This is just stupid. The won't do that. If people find a great site they'll often link to it. I don't understand why that great site would be penalize for being a site that people like.

DaddyHalbucks · 08-29-2007, 12:17 PM

I assume it changes regularly.

Just build a good site and use good practices, and Google will treat you well.

JD · 08-29-2007, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

I assume it changes regularly.

Just build a good site and use good practices, and Google will treat you well.

haha yeah.... until they change their algo up again and you lost a years worth of worth overnight. Fuck playing nice...

scottybuzz · 08-29-2007, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

umm did you miss what he was saying . one way links would be penalized.. thus building a decent site would get you penalized.

I cant see this theory being valid ..

yeh, I can definitley see google dropping decent sites.

nasko · 08-29-2007, 01:55 PM

From Google Webmaster Guidelines:

Don't participate in link schemes designed to increase your site's ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to web spammers or "bad neighborhoods" on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links.

Examples of link schemes can include:

Links intended to manipulate PageRank
Links to web spammers or bad neighborhoods on the web
Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging ("Link to me and I'll link to you.")
Buying or selling links

baddog · 08-29-2007, 02:53 PM

I wonder who doesn't know how to spell optimization, SitePro or the author?

crockett · 08-29-2007, 02:54 PM

Google is always changing their algorithm or fine tuning it.

08-29-2007, 02:57 PM

Yawn, big time.

Voodoo · 08-29-2007, 02:58 PM

Google sucks. I use Infoseek.

baddog · 08-29-2007, 03:09 PM

Be advised . . . it is only the author's opinion on some of his comments.

Chio · 08-29-2007, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR

... just /another/ "guru" trying to scare people into hiring him for seo or to get views on his ads (that are all over the place btw)

studd · 08-29-2007, 03:21 PM

So if a bunch of websites link to a new/upcoming/popular website - the linked-to site will lose its position in google? Stupid.

baddog · 08-29-2007, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by studd

So if a bunch of websites link to a new/upcoming/popular website - the linked-to site will lose its position in google? Stupid.

Incoming links should be done with care to look natural.

greg80 · 08-29-2007, 03:28 PM

This is ridicolous. I am not even going to read the article, I can see from its title it's bullshit.

I have a website wich has over 2k of NATURAL one way links and NO outbound link. Why the fuck would they penalize me for that?

baddog · 08-29-2007, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greg80

This is ridicolous. I am not even going to read the article, I can see from its title it's bullshit.

I have a website wich has over 2k of NATURAL one way links and NO outbound link. Why the fuck would they penalize me for that?

Are the incoming from relevant sites?

Jai · 08-29-2007, 03:42 PM

looks like the author of this article wrote this to help his seo by getting bunch of inbound links from sites like this one!

xxxjay · 08-29-2007, 04:01 PM

Anyone have anything official from google on this?

nasko · 08-29-2007, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay

Anyone have anything official from google on this?

This is what I found,

http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=66356

Nicky · 08-29-2007, 04:17 PM

I heard a rumor that Google likes sheep

MrChips · 08-29-2007, 04:57 PM

hahhhahahaahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahhhahahh

google - who gives a fucking shit what they are up to?

I mean - does anyone other than 2002 surfers give a fucking toss?

google is losing traffic month on month now - every dog has its day.

CurrentlySober · 08-29-2007, 05:35 PM

google likes poo

xxxjay · 08-29-2007, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrChips

google is losing traffic month on month now - every dog has its day.

??????????????????

V_RocKs · 08-29-2007, 06:20 PM

Uhhh... that article is simply stating what is already occurring. When you link to someone without getting a link back you are diluting your page rank. That is normal and has been that way since they invented PR!

This thread is going into the bin labeled, TOOL!

Iron Fist · 08-29-2007, 07:08 PM

i don't do link exchanges or trades with one of my sites and its ranking nicely in the SERPs - all inbounds from the main page to an internal link. Who knows, keep playing until you've found the magic ingredient.

zand_stein · 08-29-2007, 08:10 PM

its only publicity...........

minusonebit · 08-29-2007, 08:35 PM

I wish I had a dime for every time I heard some SEO bullshit. Build a good site that people want to visit and guess what, it'll get visited!

Nismo · 08-29-2007, 08:38 PM

Good ole spacedog. Tell us more, spacedog.

08-29-2007, 09:26 AM	#1
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	Google is changing their algorithm. Just read a SEO newsletter & Google is changing their algorithm & will penalize websites that have many one way links. IN & OUT

08-29-2007, 09:28 AM	#2
beta-tester Rock 'n Roll Baby! Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: USA, temporarly Posts: 22,562	source of such (dis)information? __________________ Sig for sale. Affordable prices. Contact me and get a great deal ;) My contact: ICQ: 944-320-46 e-mail: manca {AT} HotFreeSex4All.com

08-29-2007, 09:32 AM	#3
ztik Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Nomad Posts: 5,196	Im not sure about for search. I know just 2 days ago they changed it for PPC which is similiar to what you are saying. This was only for the top position(s). __________________ .

08-29-2007, 09:32 AM	#4
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	http://www.sitepronews.com/archives/2007/aug/29.html Seems they want to penalize sites that have outbound links to sites not linking back? Last edited by spacedog; 08-29-2007 at 09:33 AM..

08-29-2007, 09:40 AM	#7
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	Google seems to think they are the Internet authority. They want to penalize others for the exact same thing they do. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

08-29-2007, 09:36 AM	#6
Wolfy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 3,574	back to the top I go!!!!

08-29-2007, 09:43 AM	#8
Forkbeard Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: I Roam Around Posts: 2,236	Very opinionated article, kinda lacking in evidence though. Read it again and imagine that every sentence starts "I think that..." and you'll do better. __________________ Offering sponsored blog posts and custom writing services.

08-29-2007, 09:53 AM	#10
Klen Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Little Vienna Posts: 32,235	Fuck the google,soon there will be new search engine which will beat google.I mean they FORBID buying links and FORBID link exchanges.How the fuck else you will get backlinks?

08-29-2007, 10:05 AM	#15
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	Why would they make that rule?

08-29-2007, 10:10 AM	#16
headless ghost Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 893	google = bitch in heat webmasters = male dogs all hoping for a chance to hit it me = LMAO ROFL

08-29-2007, 10:11 AM	#17
fluffygrrl So Fucking Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,187	http://pagebull.com/ I've moved a while back.

08-29-2007, 10:15 AM	#19
jonesonyou Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Lincoln, NE Posts: 3,853	bad for google __________________ Completely Real Amateur girls doing awesome things! Signup to promote Nebraskacoeds Today! Hit me up on ICQ/AIM 473324556/jasonnecoeds for exclusive content to promote with! And any ?'s

08-29-2007, 11:38 AM	#23
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	I can't wait to see CNN hit PR0 and get kicked out of the SERPs.

08-29-2007, 12:02 PM	#24
Emil Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Sweden Posts: 5,657	This is just stupid. The won't do that. If people find a great site they'll often link to it. I don't understand why that great site would be penalize for being a site that people like. __________________ Free 🅑🅘🅣🅒🅞🅘🅝🅢 Every Hour (Yes, really. Free ₿itCoins.) (Signup with ONLY your Email and Password. You can also refer people and get even more.)

08-29-2007, 12:17 PM	#25
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	I assume it changes regularly. Just build a good site and use good practices, and Google will treat you well. __________________ Boner Money

08-29-2007, 01:55 PM	#28
nasko Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The Universe Posts: 148	From Google Webmaster Guidelines: Don't participate in link schemes designed to increase your site's ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to web spammers or "bad neighborhoods" on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links. Examples of link schemes can include: Links intended to manipulate PageRank Links to web spammers or bad neighborhoods on the web Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging ("Link to me and I'll link to you.") Buying or selling links __________________ 3Pic.com - 700k/day 30 days listing for $1,000!

08-29-2007, 02:53 PM	#29
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	I wonder who doesn't know how to spell optimization, SitePro or the author?

08-29-2007, 02:54 PM	#30
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,818	Google is always changing their algorithm or fine tuning it. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

08-29-2007, 02:57 PM	#31
X37375787 Guest Posts: n/a	Yawn, big time.

08-29-2007, 02:58 PM	#32
Voodoo ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 10,592	Google sucks. I use Infoseek. __________________ "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

08-29-2007, 03:09 PM	#33
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	Be advised . . . it is only the author's opinion on some of his comments.

08-29-2007, 03:21 PM	#35
studd Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 70	So if a bunch of websites link to a new/upcoming/popular website - the linked-to site will lose its position in google? Stupid.

08-29-2007, 03:28 PM	#37
greg80 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 1,644	This is ridicolous. I am not even going to read the article, I can see from its title it's bullshit. I have a website wich has over 2k of NATURAL one way links and NO outbound link. Why the fuck would they penalize me for that?

08-29-2007, 03:42 PM	#39
Jai Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Location: http://www.fitnesspornbabes.com Posts: 6,915	looks like the author of this article wrote this to help his seo by getting bunch of inbound links from sites like this one!

08-29-2007, 04:01 PM	#40
xxxjay Tube groupie. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: LoScandalous, CA Posts: 13,482	Anyone have anything official from google on this? __________________ http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

08-29-2007, 04:17 PM	#42
Nicky Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 30,071	I heard a rumor that Google likes sheep __________________ gfynicky @ gmail.com

08-29-2007, 04:57 PM	#43
MrChips Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,504	hahhhahahaahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahhhahahh google - who gives a fucking shit what they are up to? I mean - does anyone other than 2002 surfers give a fucking toss? google is losing traffic month on month now - every dog has its day.

08-29-2007, 05:35 PM	#44
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,785	google likes poo __________________ My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

08-29-2007, 06:20 PM	#46
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,428	Uhhh... that article is simply stating what is already occurring. When you link to someone without getting a link back you are diluting your page rank. That is normal and has been that way since they invented PR! This thread is going into the bin labeled, TOOL!

08-29-2007, 07:08 PM	#47
Iron Fist Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 23,400	i don't do link exchanges or trades with one of my sites and its ranking nicely in the SERPs - all inbounds from the main page to an internal link. Who knows, keep playing until you've found the magic ingredient. __________________ i like waffles

08-29-2007, 08:10 PM	#48
zand_stein Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,438	its only publicity........... __________________ Paying Affiliates DAILY by ePassporte!

08-29-2007, 08:35 PM	#49
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	I wish I had a dime for every time I heard some SEO bullshit. Build a good site that people want to visit and guess what, it'll get visited!

08-29-2007, 08:38 PM	#50
Nismo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: FLORIDA Posts: 4,977	Good ole spacedog. Tell us more, spacedog. __________________ i buy massive xxx dating traffic.