wtf??? Judge rules R. Kelly cp tape to be made public - GoFuckYourself.com

Noe · 08-23-2007, 11:55 AM

Sorry if this has been posted before...I just found out about this today....

R. Kelly appeared Tuesday in a Chicago court where prosecutors and defense attorneys ironed out a few more details in the R&B singer's child-pornography trial before jury selection starts September 17. After the prosecution tried for a reversal, Judge Vincent Gaughan upheld his ruling that the media and public could view the sex tape that allegedly depicts Kelly having sex with an underage girl and is at the heart of the charges. Gaughan said he wouldn't reconsider his original ruling because the girl who prosecutors say is in the video isn't cooperating with investigators and denies that she's the person on the tape. Had she said she was, the judge would give her victim status and protect her from a public viewing. Instead, he ruled Tuesday that the state can't call her a "victim" but must instead call her an "alleged victim" or the "state's witness." To attempt to prove that she is in fact the girl on the tape, the prosecution wants to call an expert witness to testify that denial is a common issue with victims of child pornography, but the defense argued that the theory is not backed up by science. Judge Gaughan delayed ruling on this, as well as whether an expert could testify that the veins in Kelly's hand are consistent with those in the hand of the man in the video. He is expected to rule on those matters at the next hearing, on September 10. ...

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/156...y_mariah.jhtml

Monique Niccole · 08-23-2007, 12:10 PM

Trust me, most people have already seen it anyway

Brother Bilo · 08-23-2007, 12:25 PM

All he would of had to do is just have sex with her and he would of probaby been in better shape, but he pissed on her. That's where he fucked up right there.

Noe · 08-23-2007, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Afrekete

Trust me, most people have already seen it anyway

True, but for a judge to rule that it should be public violates the rights of the victim, who is also a child.

TeenSluts · 08-23-2007, 12:33 PM

HAHAH he pissed on her?

jonesonyou · 08-23-2007, 12:37 PM

already public. Its everywhere. So I have heard .

CyberHustler · 08-23-2007, 12:40 PM

People were selling that tape on the streets of NYC like on Forham Road and shit to anybody for 5 bucks... Kids too. Walk around NY and ask who got that R.Kelly tape and 9 people out of 10 will say it's laying around their house somewhere... Shit is crazy.

Noe · 08-23-2007, 12:42 PM

Ummm, hello? Yes we know that this tape has been everywhere but don't you guys find it strange that a judge should rule that a cp tape should be made available for people to watch?

Muff Stuffers · 08-23-2007, 12:45 PM

she let him piss on her. Her fault. and since she isn't cooperating, the judge can't say its her in the video so making it public might get her to fess up and cooperate with them and say "yes, thats me".

wasn't this like 3 years ago though? Damn, if this was a regular guy, he'd have been tried, convicted and in prison already.

teg0 · 08-23-2007, 12:53 PM

Clownbarf · 08-23-2007, 10:01 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NZjTqfA4xNI

notoldschool · 08-23-2007, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clownbarf

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NZjTqfA4xNI

That shit will never stop being funny.

tony286 · 08-23-2007, 10:42 PM

How could they have a video of him fucking and he is not guility?

RogerV · 08-23-2007, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

How could they have a video of him fucking and he is not guility?

The glove didnt fit

08-23-2007, 11:55 AM	#1
Noe Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,082	wtf??? Judge rules R. Kelly cp tape to be made public Sorry if this has been posted before...I just found out about this today.... R. Kelly appeared Tuesday in a Chicago court where prosecutors and defense attorneys ironed out a few more details in the R&B singer's child-pornography trial before jury selection starts September 17. After the prosecution tried for a reversal, Judge Vincent Gaughan upheld his ruling that the media and public could view the sex tape that allegedly depicts Kelly having sex with an underage girl and is at the heart of the charges. Gaughan said he wouldn't reconsider his original ruling because the girl who prosecutors say is in the video isn't cooperating with investigators and denies that she's the person on the tape. Had she said she was, the judge would give her victim status and protect her from a public viewing. Instead, he ruled Tuesday that the state can't call her a "victim" but must instead call her an "alleged victim" or the "state's witness." To attempt to prove that she is in fact the girl on the tape, the prosecution wants to call an expert witness to testify that denial is a common issue with victims of child pornography, but the defense argued that the theory is not backed up by science. Judge Gaughan delayed ruling on this, as well as whether an expert could testify that the veins in Kelly's hand are consistent with those in the hand of the man in the video. He is expected to rule on those matters at the next hearing, on September 10. ... http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/156...y_mariah.jhtml __________________ www.xxxcontentdirect.com www.extremefeeds.com ICQ: 169980934 [email protected]

08-23-2007, 12:25 PM	#3
Brother Bilo Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: I live in cage Posts: 4,193	All he would of had to do is just have sex with her and he would of probaby been in better shape, but he pissed on her. That's where he fucked up right there. __________________

08-23-2007, 12:37 PM	#6
jonesonyou Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Lincoln, NE Posts: 3,853	already public. Its everywhere. So I have heard . __________________ Completely Real Amateur girls doing awesome things! Signup to promote Nebraskacoeds Today! Hit me up on ICQ/AIM 473324556/jasonnecoeds for exclusive content to promote with! And any ?'s

08-23-2007, 12:42 PM	#8
Noe Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,082	Ummm, hello? Yes we know that this tape has been everywhere but don't you guys find it strange that a judge should rule that a cp tape should be made available for people to watch? __________________ www.xxxcontentdirect.com www.extremefeeds.com ICQ: 169980934 [email protected]

08-23-2007, 12:45 PM	#9
Muff Stuffers Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 288	she let him piss on her. Her fault. and since she isn't cooperating, the judge can't say its her in the video so making it public might get her to fess up and cooperate with them and say "yes, thats me". wasn't this like 3 years ago though? Damn, if this was a regular guy, he'd have been tried, convicted and in prison already. __________________ Trade Links With Our Network of over 40 Sites ICQ: 280-038-839 \| EMAIL: pbwhypnotik (at) gmail.com

08-23-2007, 12:10 PM	#2
Monique Niccole Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: San Francisco Posts: 5,653	Trust me, most people have already seen it anyway

08-23-2007, 12:33 PM	#5
TeenSluts Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,966	HAHAH he pissed on her?

08-23-2007, 12:40 PM	#7
CyberHustler Masterbaiter Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 26,557	People were selling that tape on the streets of NYC like on Forham Road and shit to anybody for 5 bucks... Kids too. Walk around NY and ask who got that R.Kelly tape and 9 people out of 10 will say it's laying around their house somewhere... Shit is crazy.

08-23-2007, 12:53 PM	#10
teg0 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Gringo in Puerto Rico Posts: 4,204

08-23-2007, 10:01 PM	#11
Clownbarf Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 283	Shits all over YouTube https://youtube.com/watch?v=NZjTqfA4xNI

08-23-2007, 10:42 PM	#13
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	How could they have a video of him fucking and he is not guility?