wtf??? Judge rules R. Kelly cp tape to be made public
 

Sorry if this has been posted before...I just found out about this today....

R. Kelly appeared Tuesday in a Chicago court where prosecutors and defense attorneys ironed out a few more details in the R&B singer's child-pornography trial before jury selection starts September 17. After the prosecution tried for a reversal, Judge Vincent Gaughan upheld his ruling that the media and public could view the sex tape that allegedly depicts Kelly having sex with an underage girl and is at the heart of the charges. Gaughan said he wouldn't reconsider his original ruling because the girl who prosecutors say is in the video isn't cooperating with investigators and denies that she's the person on the tape. Had she said she was, the judge would give her victim status and protect her from a public viewing. Instead, he ruled Tuesday that the state can't call her a "victim" but must instead call her an "alleged victim" or the "state's witness." To attempt to prove that she is in fact the girl on the tape, the prosecution wants to call an expert witness to testify that denial is a common issue with victims of child pornography, but the defense argued that the theory is not backed up by science. Judge Gaughan delayed ruling on this, as well as whether an expert could testify that the veins in Kelly's hand are consistent with those in the hand of the man in the video. He is expected to rule on those matters at the next hearing, on September 10. ...

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/156...y_mariah.jhtml

Trust me, most people have already seen it anyway

All he would of had to do is just have sex with her and he would of probaby been in better shape, but he pissed on her. That's where he fucked up right there.

True, but for a judge to rule that it should be public violates the rights of the victim, who is also a child.

HAHAH he pissed on her?

already public. Its everywhere. So I have heard .

Ummm, hello? Yes we know that this tape has been everywhere but don't you guys find it strange that a judge should rule that a cp tape should be made available for people to watch?

she let him piss on her. Her fault. and since she isn't cooperating, the judge can't say its her in the video so making it public might get her to fess up and cooperate with them and say "yes, thats me".

wasn't this like 3 years ago though? Damn, if this was a regular guy, he'd have been tried, convicted and in prison already.

Shits all over YouTube
 

That shit will never stop being funny. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

How could they have a video of him fucking and he is not guility?

The glove didnt fit