Lisa Sparxxx on Wikipedia, interesting facts about this women

[ShaveBucks]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Sparxxx

Read it carefully

[GITZINGER]

"Sparxxx once stole a wallet at an internet convention."

[modF]

Now that's just funny.

[Sosa]

lol that is funny

[who]

Defamation

[BoyAlley]

Sparxxx once stole a wallet at an internet convention.

Whoever added that is kinda opening themselves up for a lawsuit bigger than shit if it turns out she didn't do it (or if proof that she did do it never materializes for that matter).

[ShaveBucks]

And the updates to her page continue.....

///
Lisa mistakenly considers herself a celebrity.



It is rumored that she once stole a wallet at an Internet convention.
///

[beemk]

damn shes going to have a list of people she can sue for defamation of character.

[ShaveBucks]

Just out of curiosity... doesn't wiki keep IP records of people who make edits?

[Forest]

lol it got removed already

[stev0]

Originally Posted by ShaveBucks

Just out of curiosity... doesn't wiki keep IP records of people who make edits?

Even if they did, I doubt they'd give out that information to anyone that asked...

[Tom_PM]

Yes they keep IP numbers of everyone who edits anything, and lists of repeat IP's that edit and get deleted for their future reference.

[StuartD]

Originally Posted by stev0

Even if they did, I doubt they'd give out that information to anyone that asked...

If she was to sue the people/person doing it for defamation, she could subpoena that info.

[Scootermuze]

I guess lots of people think this is all really funny..

A gal who's done nothing to anyone is accused of theft.. not proven.. when it was more than likely a hotel snafu...

but a few idiotic cutesy boys think it'll be fun to edit a publicly accessible site with unproven comments and other garbage..

For what reason?

I shouldn't be, but I'm still amazed at the number of assinine people in this industry.. or on this planet that are supposed to be adults and act like 10 year olds...

Unbelievable...

[PaulB IYP]

lol...........

[RawAlex]

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

Whoever added that is kinda opening themselves up for a lawsuit bigger than shit if it turns out she didn't do it (or if proof that she did do it never materializes for that matter).

Based on the edit history, it would appear to be a user called "oracleporn", but I could be wrong.

[RawAlex]

# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)

[lisa sparks]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)

Thanks!! This will come in handy..

[Fap]

"She is notable as being a "gang bang queen", and claimed a world gang bang record, reportedly having had sex with 919 men in one day at the 2004 Eroticon in Warsaw."

damnnn

[Huggles]

She is a dirtbag, regardless

[Huggles]

I personally like her wikipedia picture with her wearing MOM jeans and rocking a gunt


I'm going to add her to newpornchicks.com I think

[polish_aristocrat]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)

lol you cant assume its been Oracle Porn because it says Oracle Porn

if it was saying Lensman, would you also believe it's been Lensman who edited it? ;)

[Nikki_Licks]

Looks like Lisa is going to have a real nice lawsuit for a few of you

All these accusations and no fucking proof yet.

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)

hmmmmmmm

[lisa sparks]

Originally Posted by ShaveBucks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Sparxxx

Read it carefully

Yea this is coming from the guy with a program called "shave" yea hes trustful.. NOT

[moneymotivates]

smear campaign!

[_Richard_]

at least it got edited out

[RawAlex]

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat

lol you cant assume its been Oracle Porn because it says Oracle Porn

if it was saying Lensman, would you also believe it's been Lensman who edited it? ;)

No, you can't assume that a username at that site is the same as a username on this site. However, as wiki tracks users and IP addresses on all edits, it wouldn't be too hard to track down who made the edits (which included not only comments about the wallet in question but also about a laptop).

[Nikki_Licks]

Originally Posted by lisa sparxxx

Yea this is coming from the guy with a program called "shave" yea hes trustful.. NOT

You hang in there girl. I as well as many others don't believe any of this shit.

On another note, where is this person that accused you of this shit. I haven't seen any comments from him, besides his friends telling his side of what he feels is the truth.
I hope in the end this will be a big payout for you

Fucking people..........

[Snake Doctor]

You people are the most lawsuit happy bunch of folks I've ever seen.

Sue for this, sue for that, sue for the other thing. You really think that you can sue anyone for doing something you don't like?


There's no precedent for suing someone for info on Wikipedia. There was once a prominent political consultant whose wikipedia bio said that he was involved with the assasination of both Kennedys.
He called the owner of wikipedia and asked that those things be removed, the owner of wikipedia told him to "remove it yourself" and hung up. (source: The Long Tail, by Chris Anderson, paraphrased by me)

[ShaveBucks]

Originally Posted by lisa sparxxx

Yea this is coming from the guy with a program called "shave" yea hes trustful.. NOT

I always tell the truth 100% of the time.

Except for what I just said.

[Fap]

Originally Posted by Lenny2

You people are the most lawsuit happy bunch of folks I've ever seen.

Sue for this, sue for that, sue for the other thing. You really think that you can sue anyone for doing something you don't like?


There's no precedent for suing someone for info on Wikipedia. There was once a prominent political consultant whose wikipedia bio said that he was involved with the assasination of both Kennedys.
He called the owner of wikipedia and asked that those things be removed, the owner of wikipedia told him to "remove it yourself" and hung up. (source: The Long Tail, by Chris Anderson, paraphrased by me)

I was waiting for someone to put all this lawsuit talk to rest.

[CaptainHowdy]

Great tits regardless...

[bobby666]

sex with 919 men...........

[Sarah_Jayne]

In the wrestling suicide/murder case it was easy enough for the authorities to get details of a person editing a wikipedia entry. I am sure in a court case they could do it again.

[Rex]

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks

You hang in there girl. I as well as many others don't believe any of this shit.

Fucking people..........

what she said

[High Plains Drifter]

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash

In the wrestling suicide/murder case it was easy enough for the authorities to get details of a person editing a wikipedia entry. I am sure in a court case they could do it again.

That person came forward on their own.


However, if push came to shove, I'm sure the courts could get whatever they wanted from Wiki. It would take something serious though.

[collegeboobies]

Very funny thread, very funny that she fucked "919" guys in a day too. Damn amazing that 919 could get it up...

[madawgz]

all about lawsuits in the US .... lol

[Nikki_Licks]

Originally Posted by Lenny2

You people are the most lawsuit happy bunch of folks I've ever seen.

Sue for this, sue for that, sue for the other thing. You really think that you can sue anyone for doing something you don't like?


There's no precedent for suing someone for info on Wikipedia. There was once a prominent political consultant whose wikipedia bio said that he was involved with the assasination of both Kennedys.
He called the owner of wikipedia and asked that those things be removed, the owner of wikipedia told him to "remove it yourself" and hung up. (source: The Long Tail, by Chris Anderson, paraphrased by me)

Actually there have been other threads that she possibly could sue someone for. If it damages her name she can sue for it and I would not doubt it if she could sue for this wikipedia thing also. I am no attorney, but defamation of character is serious. Its very simple, libel or slander will get your ass in court real fast.

Just my

[Jman]

This whole deal is going to backfire on someone.

Oh well... C'est la vie ostie :-(

[NTM]

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks

I am no attorney,.....

this says it all.

in the past, there've been more "lawsuit" threats on GFY than i care to remember

i doubt even one was carried out

[pornguy]

Funny that now she shows back up to the board.

[dmhubby]

Lisa and her hubby are totally cool down to earth folks. I've had the pleasure of speaking with them on several occasions and you'll never find are more down to earth adult industry woman out there. No pretentious at all .. just cool. I'm sure she stoled nothing ...