GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Lisa Sparxxx on Wikipedia, interesting facts about this women (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=752491)

ShaveBucks 07-18-2007 10:25 AM

Lisa Sparxxx on Wikipedia, interesting facts about this women
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Sparxxx

Read it carefully :glugglug

GITZINGER 07-18-2007 10:37 AM

"Sparxxx once stole a wallet at an internet convention."

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

modF 07-18-2007 10:38 AM

Now that's just funny. :)

Sosa 07-18-2007 10:39 AM

lol that is funny

who 07-18-2007 10:40 AM

Defamation

BoyAlley 07-18-2007 10:41 AM

Quote:

Sparxxx once stole a wallet at an internet convention.

Whoever added that is kinda opening themselves up for a lawsuit bigger than shit if it turns out she didn't do it (or if proof that she did do it never materializes for that matter).

:2 cents:

ShaveBucks 07-18-2007 10:47 AM

And the updates to her page continue.....

///
Lisa mistakenly considers herself a celebrity.



It is rumored that she once stole a wallet at an Internet convention.
///

beemk 07-18-2007 10:54 AM

damn shes going to have a list of people she can sue for defamation of character.

ShaveBucks 07-18-2007 10:57 AM

Just out of curiosity... doesn't wiki keep IP records of people who make edits?

Forest 07-18-2007 10:57 AM

lol it got removed already

stev0 07-18-2007 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaveBucks (Post 12779190)
Just out of curiosity... doesn't wiki keep IP records of people who make edits?

Even if they did, I doubt they'd give out that information to anyone that asked...

Tom_PM 07-18-2007 10:59 AM

Yes they keep IP numbers of everyone who edits anything, and lists of repeat IP's that edit and get deleted for their future reference.

StuartD 07-18-2007 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 12779200)
Even if they did, I doubt they'd give out that information to anyone that asked...

If she was to sue the people/person doing it for defamation, she could subpoena that info.

Scootermuze 07-18-2007 11:01 AM

I guess lots of people think this is all really funny..

A gal who's done nothing to anyone is accused of theft.. not proven.. when it was more than likely a hotel snafu...

but a few idiotic cutesy boys think it'll be fun to edit a publicly accessible site with unproven comments and other garbage..

For what reason?

I shouldn't be, but I'm still amazed at the number of assinine people in this industry.. or on this planet that are supposed to be adults and act like 10 year olds...

Unbelievable...

PaulB IYP 07-18-2007 11:13 AM

lol...........

RawAlex 07-18-2007 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 12779101)

Whoever added that is kinda opening themselves up for a lawsuit bigger than shit if it turns out she didn't do it (or if proof that she did do it never materializes for that matter).

:2 cents:

Based on the edit history, it would appear to be a user called "oracleporn", but I could be wrong. :2 cents: :error:error:error

RawAlex 07-18-2007 11:28 AM

# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)

lisa sparks 07-18-2007 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12779355)
# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)



Thanks!! This will come in handy..

Fap 07-18-2007 11:42 AM

"She is notable as being a "gang bang queen", and claimed a world gang bang record, reportedly having had sex with 919 men in one day at the 2004 Eroticon in Warsaw."

damnnn

Huggles 07-18-2007 11:44 AM

She is a dirtbag, regardless

Huggles 07-18-2007 11:45 AM

I personally like her wikipedia picture with her wearing MOM jeans and rocking a gunt


I'm going to add her to newpornchicks.com I think

polish_aristocrat 07-18-2007 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12779355)
# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)

lol you cant assume its been Oracle Porn because it says Oracle Porn

if it was saying Lensman, would you also believe it's been Lensman who edited it? ;)

Nikki_Licks 07-18-2007 11:48 AM

Looks like Lisa is going to have a real nice lawsuit for a few of you :thumbsup

All these accusations and no fucking proof yet.

stickyfingerz 07-18-2007 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12779355)
# cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 Hu12 (Talk | contribs) m (2,846 bytes) (Reverted edits by 216.255.180.36 (talk) to last version by Bwowen) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:53, 18 July 2007 216.255.180.36 (Talk) (3,001 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:50, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (2,846 bytes) (Reverting further vandalism.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Bwowen (Talk | contribs) (3,002 bytes) (Undid revision 145475933 by Oracleporn (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:49, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (2,589 bytes) (→External links) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:48, 18 July 2007 David.atwell (Talk | contribs) m (3,002 bytes) (rvv) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 17:47, 18 July 2007 Oracleporn (Talk | contribs) (3,047 bytes) (→References) (undo)

hmmmmmmm

lisa sparks 07-18-2007 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaveBucks (Post 12779046)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Sparxxx

Read it carefully :glugglug

Yea this is coming from the guy with a program called "shave" yea hes trustful.. NOT

moneymotivates 07-18-2007 11:50 AM

smear campaign!

_Richard_ 07-18-2007 11:51 AM

at least it got edited out

RawAlex 07-18-2007 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 12779513)
lol you cant assume its been Oracle Porn because it says Oracle Porn

if it was saying Lensman, would you also believe it's been Lensman who edited it? ;)

No, you can't assume that a username at that site is the same as a username on this site. However, as wiki tracks users and IP addresses on all edits, it wouldn't be too hard to track down who made the edits (which included not only comments about the wallet in question but also about a laptop).

Nikki_Licks 07-18-2007 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lisa sparxxx (Post 12779526)
Yea this is coming from the guy with a program called "shave" yea hes trustful.. NOT

You hang in there girl. I as well as many others don't believe any of this shit.

On another note, where is this person that accused you of this shit. I haven't seen any comments from him, besides his friends telling his side of what he feels is the truth.
I hope in the end this will be a big payout for you :thumbsup

Fucking people..........:disgust

Snake Doctor 07-18-2007 12:00 PM

You people are the most lawsuit happy bunch of folks I've ever seen.

Sue for this, sue for that, sue for the other thing. You really think that you can sue anyone for doing something you don't like?


There's no precedent for suing someone for info on Wikipedia. There was once a prominent political consultant whose wikipedia bio said that he was involved with the assasination of both Kennedys.
He called the owner of wikipedia and asked that those things be removed, the owner of wikipedia told him to "remove it yourself" and hung up. (source: The Long Tail, by Chris Anderson, paraphrased by me)

ShaveBucks 07-18-2007 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lisa sparxxx (Post 12779526)
Yea this is coming from the guy with a program called "shave" yea hes trustful.. NOT

I always tell the truth 100% of the time.

Except for what I just said.

Fap 07-18-2007 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2 (Post 12779576)
You people are the most lawsuit happy bunch of folks I've ever seen.

Sue for this, sue for that, sue for the other thing. You really think that you can sue anyone for doing something you don't like?


There's no precedent for suing someone for info on Wikipedia. There was once a prominent political consultant whose wikipedia bio said that he was involved with the assasination of both Kennedys.
He called the owner of wikipedia and asked that those things be removed, the owner of wikipedia told him to "remove it yourself" and hung up. (source: The Long Tail, by Chris Anderson, paraphrased by me)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
I was waiting for someone to put all this lawsuit talk to rest.

CaptainHowdy 07-18-2007 12:06 PM

Great tits regardless...

bobby666 07-18-2007 12:26 PM

sex with 919 men...........

Sarah_Jayne 07-18-2007 12:55 PM

In the wrestling suicide/murder case it was easy enough for the authorities to get details of a person editing a wikipedia entry. I am sure in a court case they could do it again.

Rex 07-18-2007 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks (Post 12779563)
You hang in there girl. I as well as many others don't believe any of this shit.

Fucking people..........:disgust

what she said

High Plains Drifter 07-18-2007 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 12779899)
In the wrestling suicide/murder case it was easy enough for the authorities to get details of a person editing a wikipedia entry. I am sure in a court case they could do it again.

That person came forward on their own.


However, if push came to shove, I'm sure the courts could get whatever they wanted from Wiki. It would take something serious though.

collegeboobies 07-18-2007 01:01 PM

Very funny thread, very funny that she fucked "919" guys in a day too. Damn amazing that 919 could get it up...

madawgz 07-18-2007 01:03 PM

all about lawsuits in the US .... lol :1orglaugh

Nikki_Licks 07-18-2007 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2 (Post 12779576)
You people are the most lawsuit happy bunch of folks I've ever seen.

Sue for this, sue for that, sue for the other thing. You really think that you can sue anyone for doing something you don't like?


There's no precedent for suing someone for info on Wikipedia. There was once a prominent political consultant whose wikipedia bio said that he was involved with the assasination of both Kennedys.
He called the owner of wikipedia and asked that those things be removed, the owner of wikipedia told him to "remove it yourself" and hung up. (source: The Long Tail, by Chris Anderson, paraphrased by me)

Actually there have been other threads that she possibly could sue someone for. If it damages her name she can sue for it and I would not doubt it if she could sue for this wikipedia thing also. I am no attorney, but defamation of character is serious. Its very simple, libel or slander will get your ass in court real fast.

Just my :2 cents:

Jman 07-18-2007 01:14 PM

This whole deal is going to backfire on someone.

Oh well... C'est la vie ostie :-(

NTM 07-18-2007 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks (Post 12779998)
I am no attorney,.....

this says it all.

in the past, there've been more "lawsuit" threats on GFY than i care to remember

i doubt even one was carried out

pornguy 07-18-2007 01:30 PM

Funny that now she shows back up to the board.

dmhubby 07-18-2007 01:44 PM

Lisa and her hubby are totally cool down to earth folks. I've had the pleasure of speaking with them on several occasions and you'll never find are more down to earth adult industry woman out there. No pretentious at all .. just cool. I'm sure she stoled nothing ...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123