|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Europe and SE US
Posts: 582
|
The Truth: 1986 Mac Plus faster than `07 AMD Dual Core
My husband keeps telling people that his 1984 DOS computer runs word processing softwarte faster that any new Windows machine with Vista. People normally react with disbelief.
Now there is at least proof that a 1986 Mac Plus still kicks the ass of a `07 AMD DualCore. http://hubpages.com/hub/_86_Mac_Plus...eve_W ho_Wins
__________________
Jenny Seemore Pornography is the bloody gladiator who stands guard over the First Amendment |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
lurker
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
|
I can see that,less bloat faster machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,465
|
The funny thing is the results would likely be similar comparing the MAcplus to a current Mac with current MacOS versions.
Bloat isn't a microsoft exclusive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Europe and SE US
Posts: 582
|
Quote:
There are quite a few shootouts between the older Power PCs and the Win out there. http://www.barefeats.com/macvpc.html
__________________
Jenny Seemore Pornography is the bloody gladiator who stands guard over the First Amendment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sofa King Band
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outside the box
Posts: 29,903
|
It's not that the computer is faster... it's not. Put on the SAME software and the new AMD will blow it away.
It's just that Windows and the word processors now require so much more out of machines than they used to. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
FBOP Class Of 2013
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bumfuck, ky
Posts: 35,562
|
word processing is what they are testing it on? HAHAHAHAHA
what idiots |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Sofa King Band
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outside the box
Posts: 29,903
|
Yup, apparently a 25Mhz machine is way faster than a 3Ghz machine... because it runs a word processor from 1984 that does bold and underline pretty fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
emperor of my world
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: nethalands
Posts: 29,903
|
the ultimate nerd site. feels like im at school... fucking boring shit. to each his own i guess...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Doin fine
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,984
|
My texas instrument calculator from 1981 lets me add stuff up WAY faster than my pc....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
|
My 1.4Ghz AMD t-bird booted faster than my Intel E6600 Core 2 Duo does. That obviously means the 1.4Ghz AMD t-bird is superior.
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|