The Truth: 1986 Mac Plus faster than `07 AMD Dual Core

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jenny S.
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2006
    • 582

    #1

    The Truth: 1986 Mac Plus faster than `07 AMD Dual Core

    My husband keeps telling people that his 1984 DOS computer runs word processing softwarte faster that any new Windows machine with Vista. People normally react with disbelief.

    Now there is at least proof that a 1986 Mac Plus still kicks the ass of a `07 AMD DualCore.

    http://hubpages.com/hub/_86_Mac_Plus...lieve_Who_Wins
    Jenny Seemore
    Pornography is the bloody gladiator who stands guard over the First Amendment
  • tony299
    lurker
    • Aug 2002
    • 57021

    #2
    I can see that,less bloat faster machine.

    Comment

    • RawAlex
      So Fucking Banned
      • Oct 2003
      • 9465

      #3
      The funny thing is the results would likely be similar comparing the MAcplus to a current Mac with current MacOS versions.

      Bloat isn't a microsoft exclusive.

      Comment

      • Jenny S.
        Confirmed User
        • Apr 2006
        • 582

        #4
        Originally posted by RawAlex
        The funny thing is the results would likely be similar comparing the MAcplus to a current Mac with current MacOS versions.

        Bloat isn't a microsoft exclusive.
        Not a Microsoft exclusive, but a Microsoft domain.

        There are quite a few shootouts between the older Power PCs and the Win out there.

        http://www.barefeats.com/macvpc.html
        Jenny Seemore
        Pornography is the bloody gladiator who stands guard over the First Amendment

        Comment

        • StuartD
          Sofa King Band
          • Jul 2002
          • 29903

          #5
          It's not that the computer is faster... it's not. Put on the SAME software and the new AMD will blow it away.

          It's just that Windows and the word processors now require so much more out of machines than they used to.
          This is me on facebook
          This is me on twitter

          Comment

          • Jace
            FBOP Class Of 2013
            • Jan 2004
            • 35562

            #6
            word processing is what they are testing it on? HAHAHAHAHA

            what idiots

            Comment

            • StuartD
              Sofa King Band
              • Jul 2002
              • 29903

              #7
              Originally posted by Jace
              word processing is what they are testing it on? HAHAHAHAHA

              what idiots
              Yup, apparently a 25Mhz machine is way faster than a 3Ghz machine... because it runs a word processor from 1984 that does bold and underline pretty fast.
              This is me on facebook
              This is me on twitter

              Comment

              • nico-t
                emperor of my world
                • Aug 2004
                • 29901

                #8
                the ultimate nerd site. feels like im at school... fucking boring shit. to each his own i guess...

                Comment

                • stickyfingerz
                  Doin fine
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 24984

                  #9
                  My texas instrument calculator from 1981 lets me add stuff up WAY faster than my pc....

                  Comment

                  • notabook
                    Confirmed User
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 9748

                    #10
                    My 1.4Ghz AMD t-bird booted faster than my Intel E6600 Core 2 Duo does. That obviously means the 1.4Ghz AMD t-bird is superior.

                    Comment

                    Working...