FBI Inspects JT Video Records "very important" - GoFuckYourself.com

tony286 · 06-01-2007, 08:46 PM

Read this one its important two of the violations they got him on where:
Not having a real address and not keeping 20 business hours a week.

http://avn.com/index.php?Primary_Nav...tent_ID=289645

GooSearch · 06-01-2007, 08:51 PM

the man is just puttin the smackdown on everyone lately

LiveDose · 06-01-2007, 10:35 PM

Nice link Tony.

As unpleasant as this is for producers it does sound like they were being very reasonable.

baddog · 06-01-2007, 10:39 PM

He knew he was violating the law, did it anyway.

sicone · 06-01-2007, 10:44 PM

This will be a interesting one to watch.

tony286 · 06-01-2007, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

He knew he was violating the law, did it anyway.

And probably 90 percent of all webmasters are in the same boat, thats why I posted it. They have to wake up .

D · 06-01-2007, 10:47 PM

Good link. Thanks.

crockett · 06-01-2007, 11:02 PM

As a TGP/Blog owner, this stuff just makes me want to sell all my sites and just produce content to sell. At least that way I would know my 2257 records were in order.

As a free site operator there is still no real way to be fully compliant. It will be an interesting day when the first "non" producer is inspected.

RawAlex · 06-01-2007, 11:56 PM

First off, I would have to say anyone using a PO Box / Mail drop should take notice: If the man comes looking, you are fucked. It wouldn't take the man much effort to pull a list of UPS stories, mailboxes etc, and other known drop boxes and run them against 2257 record addresses. If you are doing this, now would be a very good time to fix your shit.

Second, the 20 hour rule is an interesting problem, and something that if he is in fact charged with should be fought in a court of law. If you are a company that produces one single scene and sells it to another company to distribute, you then become required to keep 20 hours a week of regular office hours to be available for record inspection for your one movie (and two performers).

That is unduely burdensome on small producers, part time companies, and occassional producers. It would have the effect of limiting free speech, because unless you had the intention of making an ongoing business of shooting porn, you wouldn't should just a single set.

I hope the lawyers are all over this like a dirty shirt. That is certainly part of the law that needs to be challenged. I cannot find any other industry where the government mandates minimum hours of operation, to be available for an inspection of records that might come once a year... 1000 hours for a 1 hour inspection. That is incredibly burdensome.

TheSenator · 06-01-2007, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

As a TGP/Blog owner, this stuff just makes me want to sell all my sites and just produce content to sell. At least that way I would know my 2257 records were in order.

As a free site operator there is still no real way to be fully compliant. It will be an interesting day when the first "non" producer is inspected.

Yeah, I would hate that day.

TGP owner would be fucked.

V_RocKs · 06-02-2007, 12:01 AM

Nice to know the FBI surfs one of the shittiest navigation websites for Gay porn.... They must have spent a lot of time there...

It feels good to know they are homos.

V_RocKs · 06-02-2007, 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

First off, I would have to say anyone using a PO Box / Mail drop should take notice: If the man comes looking, you are fucked. It wouldn't take the man much effort to pull a list of UPS stories, mailboxes etc, and other known drop boxes and run them against 2257 record addresses. If you are doing this, now would be a very good time to fix your shit.

Second, the 20 hour rule is an interesting problem, and something that if he is in fact charged with should be fought in a court of law. If you are a company that produces one single scene and sells it to another company to distribute, you then become required to keep 20 hours a week of regular office hours to be available for record inspection for your one movie (and two performers).

That is unduely burdensome on small producers, part time companies, and occassional producers. It would have the effect of limiting free speech, because unless you had the intention of making an ongoing business of shooting porn, you wouldn't should just a single set.

I hope the lawyers are all over this like a dirty shirt. That is certainly part of the law that needs to be challenged. I cannot find any other industry where the government mandates minimum hours of operation, to be available for an inspection of records that might come once a year... 1000 hours for a 1 hour inspection. That is incredibly burdensome.

I second that....

GatorB · 06-02-2007, 12:21 AM

The movies are from 1997. I do not know how they can extend the statutes of limitations when someone else out of his controll decides to re-release the content. I'd challenge that shit in court. That's like saying if I were to re-release porn for the 70's I need to have 2257 records. Pure bullshit.

06-01-2007, 08:46 PM	#1
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	FBI Inspects JT Video Records "very important" Read this one its important two of the violations they got him on where: Not having a real address and not keeping 20 business hours a week. http://avn.com/index.php?Primary_Nav...tent_ID=289645

06-01-2007, 08:51 PM	#2
GooSearch Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: FLA Posts: 2,538	the man is just puttin the smackdown on everyone lately __________________ GooSearch Real Text Ads Without The Drama Coming Back Bigger and Better Then Ever

06-01-2007, 10:35 PM	#3
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	Nice link Tony. As unpleasant as this is for producers it does sound like they were being very reasonable. __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

06-01-2007, 10:44 PM	#5
sicone Retired Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sac Posts: 18,453	This will be a interesting one to watch. __________________

06-01-2007, 10:47 PM	#7
D Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: The Valley Posts: 7,412	Good link. Thanks. __________________ -D. ICQ: 202-96-31

06-01-2007, 10:39 PM	#4
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	He knew he was violating the law, did it anyway.

06-01-2007, 11:02 PM	#8
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	As a TGP/Blog owner, this stuff just makes me want to sell all my sites and just produce content to sell. At least that way I would know my 2257 records were in order. As a free site operator there is still no real way to be fully compliant. It will be an interesting day when the first "non" producer is inspected. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

06-01-2007, 11:56 PM	#9
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	First off, I would have to say anyone using a PO Box / Mail drop should take notice: If the man comes looking, you are fucked. It wouldn't take the man much effort to pull a list of UPS stories, mailboxes etc, and other known drop boxes and run them against 2257 record addresses. If you are doing this, now would be a very good time to fix your shit. Second, the 20 hour rule is an interesting problem, and something that if he is in fact charged with should be fought in a court of law. If you are a company that produces one single scene and sells it to another company to distribute, you then become required to keep 20 hours a week of regular office hours to be available for record inspection for your one movie (and two performers). That is unduely burdensome on small producers, part time companies, and occassional producers. It would have the effect of limiting free speech, because unless you had the intention of making an ongoing business of shooting porn, you wouldn't should just a single set. I hope the lawyers are all over this like a dirty shirt. That is certainly part of the law that needs to be challenged. I cannot find any other industry where the government mandates minimum hours of operation, to be available for an inspection of records that might come once a year... 1000 hours for a 1 hour inspection. That is incredibly burdensome.

06-02-2007, 12:01 AM	#11
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,422	Nice to know the FBI surfs one of the shittiest navigation websites for Gay porn.... They must have spent a lot of time there... It feels good to know they are homos.

06-02-2007, 12:21 AM	#13
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	The movies are from 1997. I do not know how they can extend the statutes of limitations when someone else out of his controll decides to re-release the content. I'd challenge that shit in court. That's like saying if I were to re-release porn for the 70's I need to have 2257 records. Pure bullshit.