GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   FBI Inspects JT Video Records "very important" (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=738827)

tony286 06-01-2007 08:46 PM

FBI Inspects JT Video Records "very important"
 
Read this one its important two of the violations they got him on where:
Not having a real address and not keeping 20 business hours a week.


http://avn.com/index.php?Primary_Nav...tent_ID=289645

GooSearch 06-01-2007 08:51 PM

the man is just puttin the smackdown on everyone lately

LiveDose 06-01-2007 10:35 PM

Nice link Tony.

As unpleasant as this is for producers it does sound like they were being very reasonable.

baddog 06-01-2007 10:39 PM

He knew he was violating the law, did it anyway.

sicone 06-01-2007 10:44 PM

This will be a interesting one to watch.

tony286 06-01-2007 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12529222)
He knew he was violating the law, did it anyway.

And probably 90 percent of all webmasters are in the same boat, thats why I posted it. They have to wake up .

D 06-01-2007 10:47 PM

Good link. Thanks.

crockett 06-01-2007 11:02 PM

As a TGP/Blog owner, this stuff just makes me want to sell all my sites and just produce content to sell. At least that way I would know my 2257 records were in order.

As a free site operator there is still no real way to be fully compliant. It will be an interesting day when the first "non" producer is inspected.

RawAlex 06-01-2007 11:56 PM

First off, I would have to say anyone using a PO Box / Mail drop should take notice: If the man comes looking, you are fucked. It wouldn't take the man much effort to pull a list of UPS stories, mailboxes etc, and other known drop boxes and run them against 2257 record addresses. If you are doing this, now would be a very good time to fix your shit.

Second, the 20 hour rule is an interesting problem, and something that if he is in fact charged with should be fought in a court of law. If you are a company that produces one single scene and sells it to another company to distribute, you then become required to keep 20 hours a week of regular office hours to be available for record inspection for your one movie (and two performers).

That is unduely burdensome on small producers, part time companies, and occassional producers. It would have the effect of limiting free speech, because unless you had the intention of making an ongoing business of shooting porn, you wouldn't should just a single set.

I hope the lawyers are all over this like a dirty shirt. That is certainly part of the law that needs to be challenged. I cannot find any other industry where the government mandates minimum hours of operation, to be available for an inspection of records that might come once a year... 1000 hours for a 1 hour inspection. That is incredibly burdensome.

TheSenator 06-01-2007 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 12529315)
As a TGP/Blog owner, this stuff just makes me want to sell all my sites and just produce content to sell. At least that way I would know my 2257 records were in order.

As a free site operator there is still no real way to be fully compliant. It will be an interesting day when the first "non" producer is inspected.

Yeah, I would hate that day.

TGP owner would be fucked.

V_RocKs 06-02-2007 12:01 AM

Nice to know the FBI surfs one of the shittiest navigation websites for Gay porn.... They must have spent a lot of time there...

It feels good to know they are homos.

V_RocKs 06-02-2007 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12529395)
First off, I would have to say anyone using a PO Box / Mail drop should take notice: If the man comes looking, you are fucked. It wouldn't take the man much effort to pull a list of UPS stories, mailboxes etc, and other known drop boxes and run them against 2257 record addresses. If you are doing this, now would be a very good time to fix your shit.

Second, the 20 hour rule is an interesting problem, and something that if he is in fact charged with should be fought in a court of law. If you are a company that produces one single scene and sells it to another company to distribute, you then become required to keep 20 hours a week of regular office hours to be available for record inspection for your one movie (and two performers).

That is unduely burdensome on small producers, part time companies, and occassional producers. It would have the effect of limiting free speech, because unless you had the intention of making an ongoing business of shooting porn, you wouldn't should just a single set.

I hope the lawyers are all over this like a dirty shirt. That is certainly part of the law that needs to be challenged. I cannot find any other industry where the government mandates minimum hours of operation, to be available for an inspection of records that might come once a year... 1000 hours for a 1 hour inspection. That is incredibly burdensome.

I second that....

GatorB 06-02-2007 12:21 AM

The movies are from 1997. I do not know how they can extend the statutes of limitations when someone else out of his controll decides to re-release the content. I'd challenge that shit in court. That's like saying if I were to re-release porn for the 70's I need to have 2257 records. Pure bullshit.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123