.xxx Rejected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

StarkReality · 03-30-2007, 05:48 AM

Great news !

Mr. Romance · 03-30-2007, 05:49 AM

That's what we need to hear!

Mr. Romance

James_Hotmovies · 03-30-2007, 06:03 AM

Makes for a nice Friday morning.

stillsexy · 03-30-2007, 06:16 AM

not bad!!!

Corleone · 03-30-2007, 06:40 AM

great news

martinsc · 03-30-2007, 06:45 AM

hahaha
i'm thinking about those that pre-bought all those xxx domains....

Tom_PM · 03-30-2007, 06:51 AM

Excellent news.

Never doubted it.

polish_aristocrat · 03-30-2007, 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

And all this thanks to polish_aristrocrat

jesse_adultdatingdollars · 03-30-2007, 07:26 AM

I am so happy! Great news.

BBWTori · 03-30-2007, 07:38 AM

GREAT way to start off the weekend! Cheers!

selena · 03-30-2007, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nodtveidt

The details are finally on the ICANN website.

http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolut...m#_Toc36876524

Defeated...and no recourse is possible. ICM is down and out with nowhere left to go.

I read the minutes, is this the section that means that they cannot come back with this again

"Accordingly, it is resolved (07.__) that the Proposed Agreement with ICM concerning the .XXX sTLD is rejected and the application request for a delegation of the .XXX sTLD is hereby denied. "

I have not read minutes of when it came up before, so I was not sure.

This is great news, and those of you that have kept hammering the boards to keep us informed and to get us involved deserve a round of applause.

Kudos!

edgeprod · 03-30-2007, 08:02 AM

Well, they can eat a dick anyway. I'm rubbing mine right now, as a matter of fact.

CDSmith · 03-30-2007, 08:08 AM

I had a strong feeling it would be shot down in the end.

Btw, I'm not psychic or anything. :D

It was just a bad idea proposed by people who only see what they want to see as far as adult on the web is concerned. People with an agenda. I was fairly confident that once all the actual facts were presented that cooler (and hopefully more intelligent) heads would prevail.

dennisthemenace · 03-30-2007, 08:21 AM

great news

JayDeeZee · 03-30-2007, 08:35 AM

Good News! For now!

Sosa · 03-30-2007, 08:42 AM

I love it

shekinah · 03-30-2007, 08:55 AM

Do we need some celebration?

tree · 03-30-2007, 08:59 AM

fucking awesome news

Drake · 03-30-2007, 09:06 AM

Hooray!!!

Gateway69 · 03-30-2007, 09:08 AM

finally we can put this piece of shit thing to rest.. I think they need to focus on making a kids safe domain .kids, and police that area instead..

anyhow.. thank god.. and those in the industry who I wont point out that gained to make a lot of money off of .xxx shame on you.

Fetish Gimp · 03-30-2007, 09:13 AM

This is how I feel

vicki · 03-30-2007, 09:32 AM

The best news for our industry EVER! *cartwheels and cheers*

the wicked witch is finally dead!

A big thanks to everyone that voiced their opinion to ICANN

seeric · 03-30-2007, 09:46 AM

Well, here is the audio stream I recorded last night. Took me a bit to rip it off the DAT tape and normalize the audio. It is uncut and exactly as they spoke it.

.XXX was defeated 9-5 with Dr. Tomey abstaining from the vote. If you remember correctly he is the one responsible for even bringing this to ICANN in not so many words.

CLICK HERE FOR .XXX DEFEATED AUDIO STREAM - ICANN VOTES NO ON .XXX - CLICK HERE

Here is the .zip file.

CLICK HERE FOR .XXX DEFEATED AUDIO STREAM ZIP FILE- ICANN VOTES NO ON .XXX - CLICK HERE

This were public meetings in Lisbon.

*NOTE* I've parked this on my goofballing server, so it may be a little slow. Its a good listen.

Have a great day.

JMM · 03-30-2007, 09:50 AM

Now we just need to find out who the 26 "supporters" were so that people can make decisions on who they do business with.

seeric · 03-30-2007, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM

Now we just need to find out who the 26 "supporters" were so that people can make decisions on who they do business with.

no one will tell me.

MichaelP · 03-30-2007, 09:56 AM

YEEEEEEEEEEEEESSS

Another link on CNN

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/interne...?eref=rss_tech

Apolon · 03-30-2007, 09:59 AM

Great friday morning news, let's smoke some weed

Linkster · 03-30-2007, 10:01 AM

"It was not immediately clear if ICM would revise its proposal again, abandon the bid or perhaps appeal the decision or take action through the courts."

From the AP story

seeric · 03-30-2007, 10:06 AM

ICM cannot revise or even think of resubmitting the proposal this round which means it will be a few years (average) or 18 months I guess until they get a shot at it again, if they choose so, which if you listen to icann's comments from each panel member carefully, would be futile. the bottom line is icann says it will not be responsible nor undertake the duties of policing the content of the tld, nor will it allow an agency like IFFOR which is obviously a bedfellow of ICM monitor tlds as such.

there were many many other things that they brought up that ICM would have a very very difficult time getting them to change their mind on. Things that you can't throw money at.

Check out the stream. Focus on it, because at points with all the professional meeting mumbo jumbo, it gets complicated and dry, but its worth the listen.

tASSy · 03-30-2007, 10:12 AM

yay for a huge positive step in our direction.

MichaelP · 03-30-2007, 10:12 AM

I like the part where he says, "... if you vote YES, you are rejecting .xxx proposal, if you vote NO, you are voting to not rejecting ... " How many around the table were a bit puzzled about this !

I also like the part where the lady says that it is not ICANN job to regulate internet content

MichaelP · 03-30-2007, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM

Now we just need to find out who the 26 "supporters" were so that people can make decisions on who they do business with.

Remembering ACACIA ??

seeric · 03-30-2007, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qwebecexpo

I like the part where he says, "... if you vote YES, you are rejecting .xxx proposal, if you vote NO, you are voting to not rejecting ... " How many around the table were a bit puzzled about this !

I also like the part where the lady says that it is not ICANN job to regulate internet content

yes i found that refreshing. that is one of the things that many believe icann will never bend on, as well they also refused to allow a third party or sponsored entity by a tld sponsor ehhhhemmm (iffor) to be allowed to do it as well.

so that effectively shoots stuart's attempt of policng us with IFFOR.

there are some unemployed wanna be policemen this morning. they would have to be pretty ballsy to attempt to come back with this again. many things that icann does not like about this proposal cannot just be changed. its time to let it go.

RawAlex · 03-30-2007, 10:19 AM

Having stayed up late to watch the video stream live last night, I can tell you that I was pretty much amazed by the panel.

First and foremost, Susan Crawford is one major pain in the ass. I read her bio (http://www.icann.org/biog/crawford.htm ) and I guess I understand a little bit more, but wow, was her opinion both strong and heavily misdirected. For someone who is a laywer, she seems to really not grasp how ICANN could have very easily found itself in the middle of legal hell trying to regulate content online.

Some of the other members of the board had a much clearer grasp of the concepts here, including the idea that the proposal didn't meet up with the adult community as a whole, but rather with a small group of people trying to maneuver themselves into a controlling position.

What I find interesting is that none of the members of the ICANN board touched the issue of the abusive pricing structure that was proposed. Regular .com domains are $6.95 net cost. .XXX domains were going to be $70 each. I can't beleive that none of the members figured out that this would be a massive, massive money grab, where none is justified.

In the end, the board has not truly changed it's position on this issue for over a year now, and there is no way within the forseeable future that it will change, so that until the end of the current mandate for these board members, I don't think anything important will happen.

Now we need to find a list of supporters so those people can answer for their attempted brute force takeover of the industry.

pornguy · 03-30-2007, 10:22 AM

Great news., and thanks for the hard work from you two.

MichaelP · 03-30-2007, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM

Now we just need to find out who the 26 "supporters" were so that people can make decisions on who they do business with.

There is a very interesting function on GFY called "SEARCH" ...

Pretty easy to get some information about it in many threads

RawAlex · 03-30-2007, 10:29 AM

The interesting "SEARCH" function fails more often than it works, and comes up with rumors and not a list.

Would you care to help out with a couple of links?

JMM · 03-30-2007, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qwebecexpo

There is a very interesting function on GFY called "SEARCH" ...

Pretty easy to get some information about it in many threads

I don't recall any thread that gave that information. I do recall a thread were someone posted what they thought was a time consuming end around to "maybe" obtain the information.

seeric · 03-30-2007, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

Having stayed up late to watch the video stream live last night, I can tell you that I was pretty much amazed by the panel.

First and foremost, Susan Crawford is one major pain in the ass. I read her bio (http://www.icann.org/biog/crawford.htm ) and I guess I understand a little bit more, but wow, was her opinion both strong and heavily misdirected. For someone who is a laywer, she seems to really not grasp how ICANN could have very easily found itself in the middle of legal hell trying to regulate content online.

Some of the other members of the board had a much clearer grasp of the concepts here, including the idea that the proposal didn't meet up with the adult community as a whole, but rather with a small group of people trying to maneuver themselves into a controlling position.

What I find interesting is that none of the members of the ICANN board touched the issue of the abusive pricing structure that was proposed. Regular .com domains are $6.95 net cost. .XXX domains were going to be $70 each. I can't beleive that none of the members figured out that this would be a massive, massive money grab, where none is justified.

In the end, the board has not truly changed it's position on this issue for over a year now, and there is no way within the forseeable future that it will change, so that until the end of the current mandate for these board members, I don't think anything important will happen.

Now we need to find a list of supporters so those people can answer for their attempted brute force takeover of the industry.

agreed. i did hear one of the board members at the end say like 3 words about the excessive pricing, but it was nothing to write home about.

Big_Red · 03-30-2007, 10:39 AM

awesome!

germ · 03-30-2007, 10:53 AM

awesome news

seeric · 03-30-2007, 10:56 AM

i think he will try to bring it back, but based on the boards continued position and inability to budge on the merits of the proposal, i'd say that it will end up the same.

one thing that i really appreciated was that they recognized "CONSIDERABLE OPPOSITION" within the sponsored community that stuart was so happy to speak for. That shows me that they do in fact have people reading message boards and we did in fact make an impact on the final outcome of the decision. They do pay attention, and if it comes back, we will be right there again to drum up the support. I will never let my guard down, if it is not .xxx there will be some other opportunist with $ signs in his or her eyes that will crosshair us as easy targets. This is the most unity I've ever seen in adult. I am happily surprised.

Fuck I just realized I could be poisoned or shot in Phoenix. Haha.

Lykos · 03-30-2007, 11:15 AM

fucking finally,very good

MichaelP · 03-30-2007, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM

I don't recall any thread that gave that information. I do recall a thread were someone posted what they thought was a time consuming end around to "maybe" obtain the information.

Cmon .. read between the lines...

If you look at threads about the subject, then you might find some post in these where some were saying that .xxx is a good idea

2012 · 03-30-2007, 12:47 PM

schweet !

seeric · 03-30-2007, 01:15 PM

there is so much snizz here at the Furbank airport.,

FetishWeb · 03-30-2007, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

Having stayed up late to watch the video stream live last night, I can tell you that I was pretty much amazed by the panel.

First and foremost, Susan Crawford is one major pain in the ass. I read her bio (http://www.icann.org/biog/crawford.htm ) and I guess I understand a little bit more, but wow, was her opinion both strong and heavily misdirected. For someone who is a laywer, she seems to really not grasp how ICANN could have very easily found itself in the middle of legal hell trying to regulate content online.

Some of the other members of the board had a much clearer grasp of the concepts here, including the idea that the proposal didn't meet up with the adult community as a whole, but rather with a small group of people trying to maneuver themselves into a controlling position.

Seriosuly she sounds like she's been paid off. Most of her speech has nothing to do with the .XXX application and her specific arguements are illogical and circular. Not really congruent with what you would expect from a lawyer.

She even said the opposition to .XXX is not grassroot in the adult community and that the pre-regs are "good enough" proof.

So I wonder, what did Lawley buy this deranged cunt off with?

nikki99 · 03-30-2007, 01:48 PM

fucking fucking fucking awesome!!!!!!!!!!!

BusterBunny · 03-30-2007, 02:43 PM

100.......

Xplicit · 03-30-2007, 03:02 PM

Quote:

xxx Rejected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

....for another few months.

03-30-2007, 05:49 AM	#52
Mr. Romance The Face of Romance and the Symbol of Freedom Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: The America's Posts: 7,821	That's what we need to hear! Mr. Romance __________________ Free Leads Program now paying up to $6 Gerard-Director of Global Sales Sign up Here: CamStarCash Check out: FreeCamStars ICQ: 330 662 299 gerard at freecamstars . com

03-30-2007, 06:03 AM	#53
James_Hotmovies Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Philadelphia Posts: 399	Makes for a nice Friday morning. __________________ https://www.facebook.com/jamescybert www.adultrental.com

03-30-2007, 06:16 AM	#54
stillsexy Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,913	not bad!!! __________________

03-30-2007, 06:45 AM	#56
martinsc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 27,047	hahaha i'm thinking about those that pre-bought all those xxx domains.... __________________ Make Money

03-30-2007, 06:51 AM	#57
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Excellent news. Never doubted it. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

03-30-2007, 05:48 AM	#51
StarkReality Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: 4 8 15 16 23 42 Posts: 4,444	Great news !

03-30-2007, 06:40 AM	#55
Corleone C.R.E.A.M Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 15,262	great news

03-30-2007, 07:26 AM	#59
jesse_adultdatingdollars Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: San Diego Posts: 2,197	I am so happy! Great news. __________________ Got Dating Traffic? Contact: Jesse (at) adultdatingdollars.com ICQ: 296775809 or AIM: cabotime21

03-30-2007, 07:38 AM	#60
BBWTori Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: AZ/NY Posts: 615	GREAT way to start off the weekend! Cheers! __________________ Tori's Lair- Where Hot Fat Sex Reigns Supreme ICQ # 18495959

03-30-2007, 08:02 AM	#62
edgeprod Permanently Gone Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 10,019	Well, they can eat a dick anyway. I'm rubbing mine right now, as a matter of fact.

03-30-2007, 08:08 AM	#63
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	I had a strong feeling it would be shot down in the end. Btw, I'm not psychic or anything. :D It was just a bad idea proposed by people who only see what they want to see as far as adult on the web is concerned. People with an agenda. I was fairly confident that once all the actual facts were presented that cooler (and hopefully more intelligent) heads would prevail. __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

03-30-2007, 08:21 AM	#64
dennisthemenace Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: In the present moment Posts: 2,668	great news __________________ All the best to you

03-30-2007, 08:35 AM	#65
JayDeeZee Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 3,595	Good News! For now! __________________

03-30-2007, 08:42 AM	#66
Sosa In Tushy Land Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Nebraska Posts: 40,149	I love it

03-30-2007, 08:55 AM	#67
shekinah Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 8,452	Do we need some celebration? __________________ [Web Design \| Development \| Programming \| Content Writing ] ICQ: 238-890-469

03-30-2007, 08:59 AM	#68
tree Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 1,601	fucking awesome news

03-30-2007, 09:06 AM	#69
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	Hooray!!!

03-30-2007, 09:08 AM	#70
Gateway69 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,510	finally we can put this piece of shit thing to rest.. I think they need to focus on making a kids safe domain .kids, and police that area instead.. anyhow.. thank god.. and those in the industry who I wont point out that gained to make a lot of money off of .xxx shame on you. __________________ Gateway - Tech Guru Dreaming Computers IG

03-30-2007, 09:13 AM	#71
Fetish Gimp Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 1,699	This is how I feel __________________ Strapon Seduction - femdom blog \| Twitter

03-30-2007, 09:32 AM	#72
vicki Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Deep in the heart o' Texas Posts: 1,478	The best news for our industry EVER! cartwheels and cheers the wicked witch is finally dead! A big thanks to everyone that voiced their opinion to ICANN __________________ If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment. HR merchant accounts from 3.45% solid biz since 98 victoriakozub AT gmail.com skype: victoria.kozub \| ICQ: 74296746

03-30-2007, 09:46 AM	#73
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	Well, here is the audio stream I recorded last night. Took me a bit to rip it off the DAT tape and normalize the audio. It is uncut and exactly as they spoke it. .XXX was defeated 9-5 with Dr. Tomey abstaining from the vote. If you remember correctly he is the one responsible for even bringing this to ICANN in not so many words. CLICK HERE FOR .XXX DEFEATED AUDIO STREAM - ICANN VOTES NO ON .XXX - CLICK HERE Here is the .zip file. CLICK HERE FOR .XXX DEFEATED AUDIO STREAM ZIP FILE- ICANN VOTES NO ON .XXX - CLICK HERE This were public meetings in Lisbon. NOTE I've parked this on my goofballing server, so it may be a little slow. Its a good listen. Have a great day.

03-30-2007, 09:50 AM	#74
JMM Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 1,755	Now we just need to find out who the 26 "supporters" were so that people can make decisions on who they do business with.

03-30-2007, 09:56 AM	#76
MichaelP Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: QWEBEC Corporate Office Posts: 7,124	YEEEEEEEEEEEEESSS Another link on CNN http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/interne...?eref=rss_tech

03-30-2007, 09:59 AM	#77
Apolon Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Montreal Posts: 76	Great friday morning news, let's smoke some weed

03-30-2007, 10:01 AM	#78
Linkster Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: DeltaHell Posts: 3,216	"It was not immediately clear if ICM would revise its proposal again, abandon the bid or perhaps appeal the decision or take action through the courts." From the AP story __________________ Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

03-30-2007, 10:06 AM	#79
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	ICM cannot revise or even think of resubmitting the proposal this round which means it will be a few years (average) or 18 months I guess until they get a shot at it again, if they choose so, which if you listen to icann's comments from each panel member carefully, would be futile. the bottom line is icann says it will not be responsible nor undertake the duties of policing the content of the tld, nor will it allow an agency like IFFOR which is obviously a bedfellow of ICM monitor tlds as such. there were many many other things that they brought up that ICM would have a very very difficult time getting them to change their mind on. Things that you can't throw money at. Check out the stream. Focus on it, because at points with all the professional meeting mumbo jumbo, it gets complicated and dry, but its worth the listen.

03-30-2007, 10:12 AM	#80
tASSy Spread The Pink! Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: pinktown! Posts: 8,229	yay for a huge positive step in our direction. __________________ tassyPINK ICQ ~ 318097066 *

03-30-2007, 10:19 AM	#84
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	Having stayed up late to watch the video stream live last night, I can tell you that I was pretty much amazed by the panel. First and foremost, Susan Crawford is one major pain in the ass. I read her bio (http://www.icann.org/biog/crawford.htm ) and I guess I understand a little bit more, but wow, was her opinion both strong and heavily misdirected. For someone who is a laywer, she seems to really not grasp how ICANN could have very easily found itself in the middle of legal hell trying to regulate content online. Some of the other members of the board had a much clearer grasp of the concepts here, including the idea that the proposal didn't meet up with the adult community as a whole, but rather with a small group of people trying to maneuver themselves into a controlling position. What I find interesting is that none of the members of the ICANN board touched the issue of the abusive pricing structure that was proposed. Regular .com domains are $6.95 net cost. .XXX domains were going to be $70 each. I can't beleive that none of the members figured out that this would be a massive, massive money grab, where none is justified. In the end, the board has not truly changed it's position on this issue for over a year now, and there is no way within the forseeable future that it will change, so that until the end of the current mandate for these board members, I don't think anything important will happen. Now we need to find a list of supporters so those people can answer for their attempted brute force takeover of the industry.

03-30-2007, 10:22 AM	#85
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Great news., and thanks for the hard work from you two. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-30-2007, 10:29 AM	#87
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	The interesting "SEARCH" function fails more often than it works, and comes up with rumors and not a list. Would you care to help out with a couple of links?

03-30-2007, 10:39 AM	#90
Big_Red Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Do you care? Posts: 4,147	awesome! __________________ 60% Revshare. http://www.boobycash.com We got the boobs and the cash! ICQ 198-580-197 24/7 support

03-30-2007, 10:53 AM	#91
germ ( o Y o ) Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 3,108	awesome news

03-30-2007, 10:56 AM	#92
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	i think he will try to bring it back, but based on the boards continued position and inability to budge on the merits of the proposal, i'd say that it will end up the same. one thing that i really appreciated was that they recognized "CONSIDERABLE OPPOSITION" within the sponsored community that stuart was so happy to speak for. That shows me that they do in fact have people reading message boards and we did in fact make an impact on the final outcome of the decision. They do pay attention, and if it comes back, we will be right there again to drum up the support. I will never let my guard down, if it is not .xxx there will be some other opportunist with $ signs in his or her eyes that will crosshair us as easy targets. This is the most unity I've ever seen in adult. I am happily surprised. Fuck I just realized I could be poisoned or shot in Phoenix. Haha.

03-30-2007, 11:15 AM	#93
Lykos Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: World Posts: 31,027	fucking finally,very good __________________

03-30-2007, 12:47 PM	#95
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	schweet ! __________________ best host: Webair \| best sponsor: Kink \| best coder: 688218966 \| Go Fuck Yourself