POLL: Do you think USA will go to war with IRAN?! - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Subway · 02-25-2007, 07:17 AM

I hope not,

more moms without their childs, more childs without their moms.
More pain, tears and agony.

THIS COULD BE HEAVEN!

Barefootsies · 02-25-2007, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster

Where did you get this fact ?

It's totally fucking wrong !

A total of 1,112,684 personnel are on active duty within the United States
plus

Total US Military: 2,685,713

Total US Active Duty Troops: 1,450,689
Total US Reserve Troops (2004): 1,259,000

A total of 1,112,684 personnel are on active duty within the United States
plus over 1.2 million Reserve and national Guard

Major troop Deployments:

Iraq 130,000

Germany 69,395
Japan (United States Forces Japan) 47,000
South Korea (United States Forces Korea) 32,744
Italy 12,258
United Kingdom 11,093

Not all of those are combat front line units chief. Take into account how many are on a single aircraft carrier. Do you think they are going to the front line? How about airplane mechanics? You think they will be marching through Tekret?

Sure. In total numbers, there are more available. However you are not considering how many are support, and administratives.

scottybuzz · 02-25-2007, 07:42 AM

shit, not many people on this board have faith with peace.

Barefootsies · 02-25-2007, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz

shit, not many people on this board have faith with peace.

Perhaps they are are brainwashed Zionists

jayeff · 02-25-2007, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

I think much of the decision will rest with Iran though. They certainly have the power to make choices that could avoid a war, or bring about one.

I'm not at all sure you are right. Look at events of the last few years (and apart from being more overt, they are otherwise typical of US foreign policy under numerous presidents from both parties).

Before 9/11 we were already gearing up to invade Afghanistan. Within hours of 9/11 happening, we were blaming Osama Bin Laden. The Russians hadn't been able to kill or capture him when they occupied the country, but the inability of the Taliban to exile or capture him was apparently reason enough to invade a country which no-one even attempted to claim was in any shape or form a danger to us. The only extra spin we added to the emotions fostered by 9/11 was to point out that by our standards, the Taliban weren't very nice people.

Not only did we invade Afghanistan, we are still there years later despite not having found, let alone captured Bin Laden. Apart from the deaths of American troops and thousands of Afghanis, the most obvious consequence of that invasion is that the opium crop in Afghanistan has never been bigger. And we are stuck there because we displaced the only people - like them or not - who had the power to rule the country.

The American public got behind the invasion of Iraq for similarly emotional and equally spurious reasons. The cost to both sides has been even greater. And we are stuck there too, because even if there is no victory (except insofar as chaos was probably the intent from day one) if we stay, pulling out would be perceived as defeat.

So to Iran, guilty of some saber rattling: the Shia's in southern Iraq have not been totally docile and Hezbollah in Lebanon stirred up the Israelis last year. But in both instances, the activities have been considerably restrained, which strongly suggests that Iran is keeping a tight rein. And despite the occasional inflammatory rhetoric intended mainly for the folks at home, since the 1970's Iran has been quietly but consistently building political and economic ties with Europe. Finally there is their nuclear program, but as with Iraq, the reports which the US public generally do not hear about, are nowhere near as clear as - often even contradictory of - the stories coming out of the White House.

In other words, the US public is being set up once more to support a military adventure, by being fed a mix of half truths, exaggeration and lies. What Iran actually says or intends, is presumably known in Washington. But even if so, it is not going to be apparent to the likes of you and me, so long as such knowledge might get in the way of the administration's plans.

12clicks · 02-25-2007, 11:13 AM

Bush sux0r, its all about oil.

Splum · 02-25-2007, 11:17 AM

Go to "war"? Probably not full scale war it wouldnt be much of a war Iran LOST its war to Iraq so the USA could probably defeat it "militarily" within days.

directfiesta · 02-25-2007, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Bush sux0r, its all about oil.

The clueless is here ....

Quote:

Iraq poised to hand control of oil fields to foreign firms

Baghdad under pressure from Britain to pass a law giving multinationals rights to the country's reserves

Heather Stewart, economics correspondent
Sunday February 25, 2007
The Observer

Baghdad is under pressure from Britain and the US to pass an oil law which would hand long-term control of Iraq's energy assets to foreign multinationals, according to campaigners.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/busin...020560,00.html

psili · 02-25-2007, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Bush sux0r, its all about oil.

What else would it be about?

This is probably the dumbest comment I've ever made, but if the slave trade involved arabs, the US would probably be waring in Africa and pussyfooting around the middle east.

Just a thought.

directfiesta · 02-25-2007, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psili

What else would it be about?

For George W. Bush, it was sold to him as a vengeance for the humiliation that Saddam was doing to his dad ... George bought that easy, since he is not very smart ... The oil factor for him was a small factor.

For the Cheney, Rice, Wolfowitz and the other hawks, it was naturally oil ... They played Bush and he fell for it ...

One thing it was not about was the well being of the Iraqi population or the stabilization of the middle-east.

Jakke PNG · 02-25-2007, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj pussy

psili · 02-25-2007, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TeenGodFather

If only.....

scottybuzz · 02-25-2007, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Go to "war"? Probably not full scale war it wouldnt be much of a war Iran LOST its war to Iraq so the USA could probably defeat it "militarily" within days.

youd have thought the yanks didnt go to a "war" when they were against a bunch of viets with just spears and spikeforks, but that was called a war. irans miilatary power is nothing compared to usa. but problems arise. just like they did in vietnam

scottybuzz · 02-25-2007, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Bush sux0r, its all about oil.

please vote 12clicks!

aroy3719 · 02-25-2007, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

90% of the USA's troops are deployed. So the answer's no.

Probably true.

Kimo · 02-25-2007, 02:03 PM

i sure hope not

CDSmith · 02-25-2007, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakula

Are you a zionist? You smell like one. Move along stupid, this issue is above your intelligence.

Zionist shmionist. I'm about ridiculing mindless hate-mongering monkeys such as yourself until your nuts fester.

That's all.

zionist.... lol. Go shoot someone, idiot.

Naja-ram · 02-25-2007, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakula

No matter what anyone say here, do not trust whatever you read.
We all know that there are more zionist fuckers on this board then there are ants on this planet.

The only reason to bomb/attack Iran would be because of their nuclear program. So, are they not allowed? Why not? If they are not allowed how come Israel is allowed to have nuclear weapons?
Tell me the difference here.

Second, when did Iran start a war last time? Now, most of you fuckers on this board can barely speak your own language (english), so to find out the answer for this question, you have to google it.

Now, you all americans should see this and read the report.
But here is a peek.... Educate yourself.

We all know that the war on Iraq is a failure, you can just look at youtube and see yourself how many videos of US military doing shit to the locals in Iraq. This creates anger, this anger will be converted to what you call "terrorism" however, I wouldnt qualify it as terrorism more like revenge.

9/11 happend because of a reason, look back in your history and see what you have done in the middleeast.

This is basic logic, not to you all, uneducated muthafuckers, but if you go out and you hit someone in the face, what will they do to you? Ofcourse hit you back. Same goes in war.

A war on iran will probably never happen. Israel cant afford it.
But i hope this war will happend, because I hope Iran gives Israel what they deserve.

Alla akbar ahooy

Naja-ram · 02-25-2007, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj pussy

someone has do attack the midget.

this "midget" happens to be smarter then 70% of you gfy dumbasses

Jakke PNG · 02-25-2007, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj pussy

someone has do attack the midget.

He just wants to get rid of spyware..why attack him?!

Dirty Dane · 02-25-2007, 03:01 PM

With all the opposition I dont think it will be during Bushs period. Unless something extraordinary happens. U never know.

scottybuzz · 02-25-2007, 06:15 PM

yeh, i read in the paper a few days ago that one senior congress official said that if bush went to war then congress may stop him

dont know the validity of that, but reminds me of 24!

Fap · 02-25-2007, 07:24 PM

bush isnt the only reason for going to war.. you saw the approval ratings about going to war? I mean Hillary DID vote to go in

directfiesta · 02-25-2007, 10:01 PM

Fuck ratings... The King and his black emminence are at work ...:

US accused of drawing up plan to bomb Iran

An extensive article in the New Yorker magazine by the investigative journalist Seymour Hersh describes the contingency bombing plan as part of a general overhaul by the Bush administration of its policy towards Iran.

...

Elements of the tough new approach towards Tehran outlined by Hersh include:

· Clandestine operations against Iran and Syria, as well as the Hizbullah movement in Lebanon - even to the extent of bolstering Sunni extremist groups that are sympathetic to al-Qaida

· Sending US special forces into Iranian territory in pursuit of Iranian operatives, as well as to gather intelligence

· Secret operations are being funded by Saudi Arabia to avoid scrutiny by Congress. "There are many, many pots of black money, scattered in many places and used all over the world on a variety of missions," Hersh quotes a Pentagon consultant as saying.

As in the run-up to the Iraq war, the vice-president, Dick Cheney, has bypassed other administration officials to take charge of the aggressive new policy, working along with the deputy national security adviser, Elliott Abrams, and the former ambassador to Kabul and Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad.

Mr Cheney is also relying heavily on Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi national security adviser, who spent 22 years as ambassador to the US, and who has been offering his advice on foreign policy to Mr Bush since he first contemplated running for president.

....

Hersh, who made his reputation by breaking the story of the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam war, was among the first US journalists to report on the prison abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib. Although the most explosive material was supplied by unnamed sources, his status in US journalism made his latest report an immediate talking point on yesterday's TV chatshows.

Peace and democracy have such an aftertaste .....

INever · 02-25-2007, 10:22 PM

SOME of America?s most senior military commanders are prepared to resign if the White House orders a military strike against Iran, according to highly placed defence and intelligence sources.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle1434540.ece

Damian_Maxcash · 02-25-2007, 10:33 PM

Divide and Conquer - he is going for an East/West split.

His mistake is that China will take the lead role if that happens - or maybe not a mistake at all?

IMHO.

4Man · 02-26-2007, 12:01 AM

Sure they need oil

Godsmack · 02-26-2007, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj pussy

Iran hangs man for running porn ring:

Tehran, Iran, A man was publicly hanged in the town of Qazvin, west of the Iranian capital Tehran, a state-run daily reported on Tuesday.

The unnamed man was accused of running a brothel and producing pornographic videos along with his wife, the daily Iran Newspaper wrote.

The couple had both been sentenced to 10 years in prison, five years in exile, 80 lashes and execution for running the prostitution ring and being found in possession of alcohol, drugs, and illicit CDs.

The man?s sentence was carried out in front of the judge that sentenced him in one of the town?s squares on Monday morning, while his wife had been executed in February 2004, the report said

So sad and barbaric...

But doesnt the USA have death penalty as well?

Stephen McTowelie · 02-26-2007, 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakula

Israel´s future has already been written, even if you dont like it.
Besides, we are many people all over europe who believe the same thing as the president of Iran when it comes to the Israel issue.

The zionist fuckers didnt learn anything from ww2, its time to set records straight.

Wow you really play the racist moron well

I am from Europe too so please don't make out that all Europeans are as stupid and bigoted as you !

Naja-ram · 02-26-2007, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen McTowelie

Wow you really play the racist moron well

I am from Europe too so please don't make out that all Europeans are as stupid and bigoted as you !

you have a cock up your brain

VicD · 02-26-2007, 05:08 AM

bump for world politics

xcitecash · 02-26-2007, 05:22 AM

Thwe British Nave is already there and sending more warships to the area...its gonna happen

we never fucking learn

themonk · 02-26-2007, 05:26 AM

not really this way they will catch all the world

Stephen McTowelie · 02-26-2007, 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naja-ram

you have a cock up your brain

WTF ?? you base this on what ? the fact you have a cock up his ass instead ?? I am not saying we should go to war with Iran but out of all the countries in the world who you wouldn't trust with Nukes Iran would be top of the list lets be honest within ten years of Iran having a bomb they'll either use it or pass it to someone who will !, or are you not capable of a reasoned argument with that cloud of hate over your eyes !
Why do all Muslim/Arab countries support each other regardless and then shout bloody murder when the UK supports the US on anything or any western country objects to being told that they should be annihilated !
I dont know why i am bothering to answer you anyway tard !

Adultnet · 02-26-2007, 06:09 AM

Iran invest more and more money to get a nuclear ability and threatens with the destruction of Israel and an optional nuclear war against anyone that can have different views then they hold.

Adultnet · 02-26-2007, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by INever

SOME of America?s most senior military commanders are prepared to resign if the White House orders a military strike against Iran, according to highly placed defence and intelligence sources.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle1434540.ece

why should soldiers love war ?

12clicks · 02-26-2007, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Fuck ratings... The King and his black emminence are at work ...:

US accused of drawing up plan to bomb Iran

An extensive article in the New Yorker magazine by the investigative journalist Seymour Hersh describes the contingency bombing plan as part of a general overhaul by the Bush administration of its policy towards Iran.

...

Elements of the tough new approach towards Tehran outlined by Hersh include:

· Clandestine operations against Iran and Syria, as well as the Hizbullah movement in Lebanon - even to the extent of bolstering Sunni extremist groups that are sympathetic to al-Qaida

· Sending US special forces into Iranian territory in pursuit of Iranian operatives, as well as to gather intelligence

· Secret operations are being funded by Saudi Arabia to avoid scrutiny by Congress. "There are many, many pots of black money, scattered in many places and used all over the world on a variety of missions," Hersh quotes a Pentagon consultant as saying.

As in the run-up to the Iraq war, the vice-president, Dick Cheney, has bypassed other administration officials to take charge of the aggressive new policy, working along with the deputy national security adviser, Elliott Abrams, and the former ambassador to Kabul and Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad.

Mr Cheney is also relying heavily on Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi national security adviser, who spent 22 years as ambassador to the US, and who has been offering his advice on foreign policy to Mr Bush since he first contemplated running for president.

....

Hersh, who made his reputation by breaking the story of the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam war, was among the first US journalists to report on the prison abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib. Although the most explosive material was supplied by unnamed sources, his status in US journalism made his latest report an immediate talking point on yesterday's TV chatshows.

Peace and democracy have such an aftertaste .....

its funny watching trash talk about peace.
Yes, our enemies are brilliant peace loving people and if we'd just make friends, we'd all get along.
luckily, trash like this never gets close to leadership

directfiesta · 02-26-2007, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

its funny watching trash talk about peace.
Yes, our enemies are brilliant peace loving people and if we'd just make friends, we'd all get along.
luckily, trash like this never gets close to leadership

usual pointless reply ... next!

Madame0120 · 02-26-2007, 08:17 AM

You mean we aren't? Pffft!

darling2 · 02-26-2007, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin

Im hoping so. Makes for good TV.

This is the best pro war argument yet LOL. Reality TV at its best.

rocketrich · 02-26-2007, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakula

Israel´s future has already been written, even if you dont like it.
Besides, we are many people all over europe who believe the same thing as the president of Iran when it comes to the Israel issue.

The zionist fuckers didnt learn anything from ww2, its time to set records straight.

Shakula....I have a question for you, will you answer it?

scottybuzz · 02-26-2007, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocketrich

Shakula....I have a question for you, will you answer it?

you just asked it.

CDSmith · 03-15-2012, 06:46 AM

5 year bump.

BFT3K · 03-15-2012, 07:52 AM

scottybuzz · 03-18-2012, 03:49 PM

heck of a bump there cdsmith.

CDSmith · 03-19-2012, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz

heck of a bump there cdsmith.

I rarely bump oldies, but when I do it's usually because I was drinking Dos Equis.

View Poll Results: do you think usa will go to war with iran
yes	77	58.33%
no	37	28.03%
No opinion as of yet.	18	13.64%
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll

02-25-2007, 07:42 AM	#53
scottybuzz Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: NY Posts: 14,800	shit, not many people on this board have faith with peace. __________________ $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

02-25-2007, 11:13 AM	#56
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,788	Bush sux0r, its all about oil. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

02-25-2007, 02:03 PM	#66
Kimo ... Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Maryland ICQ:87038677 Posts: 11,542	i sure hope not __________________ ...

02-25-2007, 06:15 PM	#72
scottybuzz Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: NY Posts: 14,800	yeh, i read in the paper a few days ago that one senior congress official said that if bush went to war then congress may stop him dont know the validity of that, but reminds me of 24! __________________ $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

02-25-2007, 07:17 AM	#51
Subway Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Here Posts: 584	I hope not, more moms without their childs, more childs without their moms. More pain, tears and agony. THIS COULD BE HEAVEN!

02-25-2007, 11:17 AM	#57
Splum Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 6,195	Go to "war"? Probably not full scale war it wouldnt be much of a war Iran LOST its war to Iraq so the USA could probably defeat it "militarily" within days.

02-25-2007, 03:01 PM	#71
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	With all the opposition I dont think it will be during Bushs period. Unless something extraordinary happens. U never know.

02-25-2007, 07:24 PM	#73
Fap Just Du It Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 12,094	bush isnt the only reason for going to war.. you saw the approval ratings about going to war? I mean Hillary DID vote to go in

02-25-2007, 10:01 PM	#74
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Punta Cana, DR Posts: 29,605	Fuck ratings... The King and his black emminence are at work ...: US accused of drawing up plan to bomb Iran An extensive article in the New Yorker magazine by the investigative journalist Seymour Hersh describes the contingency bombing plan as part of a general overhaul by the Bush administration of its policy towards Iran. ... Elements of the tough new approach towards Tehran outlined by Hersh include: · Clandestine operations against Iran and Syria, as well as the Hizbullah movement in Lebanon - even to the extent of bolstering Sunni extremist groups that are sympathetic to al-Qaida · Sending US special forces into Iranian territory in pursuit of Iranian operatives, as well as to gather intelligence · Secret operations are being funded by Saudi Arabia to avoid scrutiny by Congress. "There are many, many pots of black money, scattered in many places and used all over the world on a variety of missions," Hersh quotes a Pentagon consultant as saying. As in the run-up to the Iraq war, the vice-president, Dick Cheney, has bypassed other administration officials to take charge of the aggressive new policy, working along with the deputy national security adviser, Elliott Abrams, and the former ambassador to Kabul and Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad. Mr Cheney is also relying heavily on Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi national security adviser, who spent 22 years as ambassador to the US, and who has been offering his advice on foreign policy to Mr Bush since he first contemplated running for president. .... Hersh, who made his reputation by breaking the story of the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam war, was among the first US journalists to report on the prison abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib. Although the most explosive material was supplied by unnamed sources, his status in US journalism made his latest report an immediate talking point on yesterday's TV chatshows. Peace and democracy have such an aftertaste ..... __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

02-25-2007, 10:22 PM	#75
INever Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: .......in a niche, in orbit...... Posts: 3,593	SOME of America?s most senior military commanders are prepared to resign if the White House orders a military strike against Iran, according to highly placed defence and intelligence sources. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle1434540.ece

02-25-2007, 10:33 PM	#76
Damian_Maxcash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MaxCash.com Posts: 12,745	Divide and Conquer - he is going for an East/West split. His mistake is that China will take the lead role if that happens - or maybe not a mistake at all? IMHO.

02-26-2007, 12:01 AM	#77
4Man Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 3,830	Sure they need oil

02-26-2007, 05:08 AM	#81
VicD ICQ: 304-611-162 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Masterdam Posts: 13,245	bump for world politics

02-26-2007, 05:22 AM	#82
xcitecash Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Cambridge UK Posts: 801	Thwe British Nave is already there and sending more warships to the area...its gonna happen we never fucking learn

02-26-2007, 05:26 AM	#83
themonk Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,511	not really this way they will catch all the world __________________ 175$ Per Sale - The Best Sponsor

02-26-2007, 06:09 AM	#85
Adultnet Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 8,713	Iran invest more and more money to get a nuclear ability and threatens with the destruction of Israel and an optional nuclear war against anyone that can have different views then they hold. __________________ TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996! Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours!

02-26-2007, 08:17 AM	#89
Madame0120 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: In my own lil World Posts: 1,227	You mean we aren't? Pffft! __________________ Try Something New! Teasing Bucks Mistress Always Wins!

03-15-2012, 06:46 AM	#93
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	5 year bump. __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

03-15-2012, 07:52 AM	#94
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764

03-18-2012, 03:49 PM	#95
scottybuzz Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: NY Posts: 14,800	heck of a bump there cdsmith. __________________ $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$