Frack into CP Territory? [PICS AND EVIDENCE!] - Page 4 - GoFuckYourself.com

goldmine · 02-15-2007, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate

You can honestly tell me that in the gallery ending with /1/ that the girl on the bottom, second from the left looks 18? Looks about 15-16 to me.

I agree. she looks 15-16 to me.

DTK · 02-15-2007, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Ok who had you post all that?

Best question in an otherwise lame thread

BitAudioVideo · 02-15-2007, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

i honestly think it just looks like a young girl....18-19 easily though...she isn't even showing any skin though...LOL

for those wondering, it is this girl
http://www.amateurandvoyeur.com/pics.../756319513.jpg

only thing wrong with this pick is the elmers glue used to fake the cum shot

themonk · 02-15-2007, 11:08 PM

oh that is sux

Tempest · 02-15-2007, 11:08 PM

I just love it when some moron posts some long ass thread and owns themselves with their stupidity.

Pimpin_J · 02-15-2007, 11:42 PM

I call bullshit

Lykos · 02-16-2007, 12:37 AM

drama lama

lol

02-16-2007, 12:42 AM

You are fucking sick... your posts make me want to vomit for hours at a time.

This is just 1 example.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

we work in an industry where it is acceptable to make girls LOOK under 18, so of course there are girls there that look under 18

DateDoc · 02-16-2007, 12:52 AM

who hijacked Squishy's acct?

Jace · 02-16-2007, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntiDrama

You are fucking sick... your posts make me want to vomit for hours at a time.

This is just 1 example.

nothing I stated was any opinions of mine, they are pure fact of our industry, if you are going to vomit, it is because of the industry you are in, not me

Jace · 02-16-2007, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntiDrama

You are fucking sick... your posts make me want to vomit for hours at a time.

This is just 1 example.

if reading a fact about our industry makes you wanna vomit, I would imagine this would make you poop your pants
http://www3.littleapril.com/67548195/tour.html

darksoul · 02-16-2007, 01:58 AM

is this idiot banned yet ?

V_RocKs · 02-16-2007, 02:03 AM

My ruling on this...

I see possibly under aged pics of fully clothed teenagers. But in many of them they appear to be in college dorms so guessing the ages of fully clothed girls is a waste of time.

As for the paysite. Their 2257 page is not in the proper format and does not have the proper data in it. Also many pages on the website do not have 2257 notices but do have pornography on them. That is not good.

crockett · 02-16-2007, 02:09 AM

Well one thing is for sure, a lot of the pics in question on those galleries are "not" sponsor provided or "bought" content from a content provider. Looks like he has been grabbing pics off user groups or where ever else he can find them on the net and using them for this site.

While it's hard to tell if any are underage, I'd have to question a few myself and I'd bet they likely are. The one's in question IMO don't contain nudity but still I think using them on an adult site could be breaking some sort of law, specially because a few are posing in sexually provocative poses.

btw in case you can't figure it out, the missing word in the url is "and"

V_RocKs · 02-16-2007, 02:20 AM

Hmm.. that chick in the sweatshirt is wearing a high school cheerleaders sweatshirt...

Nookster · 02-16-2007, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

Be real careful coon.

gecko · 02-16-2007, 02:37 AM

this is what I get for going outside

dissipate · 02-16-2007, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul

is this idiot banned yet ?

Looks like those sites are using your nameservers.

KrisKross · 02-16-2007, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

Hmm.. that chick in the sweatshirt is wearing a high school cheerleaders sweatshirt...

I know plenty of 18 year olds in high school.

Mr.Right - Banned For Life · 02-16-2007, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate

Looks like those sites are using your nameservers.

Anna_O · 02-16-2007, 04:04 AM

Don't blame Squishy - blame his parents for not choking him to death the day he was born...

polish_aristocrat · 02-16-2007, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links

franckkkkkkkkkkkkkkk (08:38 PM) :
ahaha tell him i told him to fuck off the little punk hahah you can copy and paste this
tell him to suck my cock
Juicy D. Links® (08:38 PM) :
kk

seriously whats up with Franck?

did he stop posting on purpose cause he's addicted or what?

Barefootsies · 02-16-2007, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldmine

I agree. she looks 15-16 to me.

jscott · 02-16-2007, 07:00 AM

A Thai whore said I ilook 16 years old yet she still wanted to fuck me, does that make her bad? I'm well over 20 btw

....oh, and I once banged a girl who looked 17, her drivers license said she is 22yrs old, am I a bad person?

polish_aristocrat · 02-16-2007, 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott

A Thai whore said I ilook 16 years old yet she still wanted to fuck me, does that make her bad? I'm well over 20 btw

....oh, and I once banged a girl who looked 17, her drivers license said she is 22yrs old, am I a bad person?

yes you are bad cause you fuck Thai whores, ask Rhesus

who · 02-16-2007, 07:05 AM

Even I don't make threads as dumb as this.

NoWhErE · 02-16-2007, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

OMFG thats priceless

Mike Dutch · 02-16-2007, 07:13 AM

Only on GFY

jscott · 02-16-2007, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat

yes you are bad cause you fuck Thai whores, ask Rhesus

Nope, not true, i USED to fuck Thai whores, but I do NOT anymore

Klen · 02-16-2007, 07:22 AM

And news from admins about this thread?

u-Bob · 02-16-2007, 08:27 AM

1. didn't see any underage stuff there.
2. 2257 means shit when you're in the EU. It would even be illegal here to give out that info.

u-Bob · 02-16-2007, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anna_O

Don't blame Squishy - blame his parents for not choking him to death the day he was born...

u-Bob · 02-16-2007, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldmine

I agree. she looks 15-16 to me.

looks older to me.

u-Bob · 02-16-2007, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0

Uh oh, squishypimp is about to get banned again...

let's hope so

who · 02-16-2007, 08:47 AM

ALso franck should be banned for encouraging underage drinking. SHame on you franck. how could you make them do this:!?!

http://www.amateurandvoyeur.com/pics.../993829601.jpg

u-Bob · 02-16-2007, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

ALso franck should be banned for encouraging underage drinking. SHame on you franck. how could you make them do this:!?!

http://www.amateurandvoyeur.com/pics.../993829601.jpg

hmm, does the one in the middle have a moustache?

who · 02-16-2007, 09:04 AM

I"ve been looking for evidence of CP on that site for about 30 mins now. There's none at all. There's maybe a couple of pics of underage girls, but who the fuck knows, these days? If there was going to be CP itd be fucking obvious. not 'oh she looks 16 to me' shit like all the jerks in here are going on about.

And I just HAD to share this.

_Richard_ · 02-16-2007, 09:24 AM

what a bs thread

R

fris · 02-16-2007, 09:33 AM

owned worse than paris hilton on every internet site

tranza · 02-16-2007, 09:35 AM

I don't see any proof in this thread.

Shouldn't squishpimp be banned for starting shit like this?

czarina · 02-16-2007, 09:40 AM

the pages are gone, but dont go accusing people of cp, without evidence. My neighbor is 19, and she looks like she is 15. I actually asked her to see her ID before even letting her into my house to play with my baby (I dont need kids poking around my house, and may be finding porn in my computer while I go to the bathroom).

Klen · 02-16-2007, 09:42 AM

Intresting,still no new post from squishpimp neither reply from Franck.

Dirty F · 02-16-2007, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

Intresting,still no new post from squishpimp neither reply from Franck.

I got nothing to say besides that Squishy is a total idiot and that i ofcourse dont have anything to do with CP. And if he isnt banned already he should be for claiming i am without evidence.

who · 02-16-2007, 09:51 AM

Someone'll catch you some day.

MetaMan · 02-16-2007, 09:55 AM

Franck da Fag,

i thought he only promoted gay porn?

jennym · 02-16-2007, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

I can 100% guarantee it is all legit

If you use this to guarantee it, then you have issues.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

I am not sure what old ass looking kids you have where you come from, but most kids around here don't have full boobs and pubic hair

Coming from a mother of a 12 year old and a 15 year old, you couldn't be further from the truth.

Pimpin_J · 02-16-2007, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

HOLY FUCKIN SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IllTestYourGirls · 02-16-2007, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

I"ve been looking for evidence of CP on that site for about 30 mins now. There's none at all. There's maybe a couple of pics of underage girls, but who the fuck knows, these days? If there was going to be CP itd be fucking obvious. not 'oh she looks 16 to me' shit like all the jerks in here are going on about.

And I just HAD to share this.

she looks 13, 14 tops!

rowan · 02-16-2007, 10:29 AM

My opinion:

The images that I looked at are not CP

However, it's probably not too sensible promoting a site with ripped pics either. Don't forget you're dealing with a sponsor that steals content and has no model releases. (This is a generic comment, I have no idea whether Franck's sponsor specifically does this)

rowan · 02-16-2007, 10:31 AM

I can see two potential problems here-

1. Copyright violation. The copyright most likely rests with the person holding the camera, unless they have signed a form saying they assign or relinquish copyright.

2. Use of a likeness without a release. The person(s) featured in the photos ARE identifiable (eventually) and their image is being used for commercial gain.

02-15-2007, 11:08 PM	#154
themonk Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,511	oh that is sux __________________ 175$ Per Sale - The Best Sponsor

02-15-2007, 11:42 PM	#156
Pimpin_J Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: SplitInfinity.com Posts: 3,637	I call bullshit __________________

02-16-2007, 12:37 AM	#157
Lykos Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: World Posts: 31,027	drama lamalol __________________

02-16-2007, 12:52 AM	#159
DateDoc Outside looking in. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: To Hell You Ride Posts: 14,243	who hijacked Squishy's acct? __________________

02-16-2007, 01:58 AM	#162
darksoul Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: /root/ Posts: 4,997	is this idiot banned yet ? __________________ 1337 5y54\|)m1n: 157717888 BM-2cUBw4B2fgiYAfjkE7JvWaJMiUXD96n9tN Cambooth

02-15-2007, 11:08 PM	#155
Tempest Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: West Coast, Canada. Posts: 10,217	I just love it when some moron posts some long ass thread and owns themselves with their stupidity.

02-16-2007, 02:03 AM	#163
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,409	My ruling on this... I see possibly under aged pics of fully clothed teenagers. But in many of them they appear to be in college dorms so guessing the ages of fully clothed girls is a waste of time. As for the paysite. Their 2257 page is not in the proper format and does not have the proper data in it. Also many pages on the website do not have 2257 notices but do have pornography on them. That is not good.

02-16-2007, 02:09 AM	#164
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	Well one thing is for sure, a lot of the pics in question on those galleries are "not" sponsor provided or "bought" content from a content provider. Looks like he has been grabbing pics off user groups or where ever else he can find them on the net and using them for this site. While it's hard to tell if any are underage, I'd have to question a few myself and I'd bet they likely are. The one's in question IMO don't contain nudity but still I think using them on an adult site could be breaking some sort of law, specially because a few are posing in sexually provocative poses. btw in case you can't figure it out, the missing word in the url is "and" __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

02-16-2007, 02:20 AM	#165
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,409	Hmm.. that chick in the sweatshirt is wearing a high school cheerleaders sweatshirt...

02-16-2007, 02:37 AM	#167
gecko ****** Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 21,846	this is what I get for going outside __________________ [email protected]

02-16-2007, 04:04 AM	#171
Anna_O Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 5,773	Don't blame Squishy - blame his parents for not choking him to death the day he was born... __________________ Fetish by Anna Paysite - Nylons Bondage Latex Lesbians Glamour Annas Dungeon - 70k / day Fetish TGP ICQ 246797915

02-16-2007, 07:00 AM	#174
jscott So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Taipei Posts: 25,198	A Thai whore said I ilook 16 years old yet she still wanted to fuck me, does that make her bad? I'm well over 20 btw ....oh, and I once banged a girl who looked 17, her drivers license said she is 22yrs old, am I a bad person?

02-16-2007, 07:05 AM	#176
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	Even I don't make threads as dumb as this.

02-16-2007, 07:13 AM	#178
Mike Dutch Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands Posts: 5,607	Only on GFY __________________ Advidi.com -- Your Dating, Diet and Skincare Partner with over 1000 offers --

02-16-2007, 07:22 AM	#180
Klen Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Little Vienna Posts: 32,235	And news from admins about this thread?

02-16-2007, 08:27 AM	#181
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	1. didn't see any underage stuff there. 2. 2257 means shit when you're in the EU. It would even be illegal here to give out that info.

02-16-2007, 08:47 AM	#185
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	ALso franck should be banned for encouraging underage drinking. SHame on you franck. how could you make them do this:!?! http://www.amateurandvoyeur.com/pics.../993829601.jpg

02-16-2007, 09:04 AM	#187
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	I"ve been looking for evidence of CP on that site for about 30 mins now. There's none at all. There's maybe a couple of pics of underage girls, but who the fuck knows, these days? If there was going to be CP itd be fucking obvious. not 'oh she looks 16 to me' shit like all the jerks in here are going on about. And I just HAD to share this.

02-16-2007, 09:24 AM	#188
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 30,989	what a bs thread R

02-16-2007, 09:33 AM	#189
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,372	owned worse than paris hilton on every internet site __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

02-16-2007, 09:35 AM	#190
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	I don't see any proof in this thread. Shouldn't squishpimp be banned for starting shit like this? __________________ I'm just a newbie.

02-16-2007, 09:40 AM	#191
czarina Webmaster Extraordinaire Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: A beautiful beach... Posts: 10,748	the pages are gone, but dont go accusing people of cp, without evidence. My neighbor is 19, and she looks like she is 15. I actually asked her to see her ID before even letting her into my house to play with my baby (I dont need kids poking around my house, and may be finding porn in my computer while I go to the bathroom).

02-16-2007, 09:42 AM	#192
Klen Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Little Vienna Posts: 32,235	Intresting,still no new post from squishpimp neither reply from Franck.

02-16-2007, 09:51 AM	#194
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	Someone'll catch you some day.

02-16-2007, 09:55 AM	#195
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	Franck da Fag, i thought he only promoted gay porn?

02-16-2007, 10:29 AM	#199
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	My opinion: The images that I looked at are not CP However, it's probably not too sensible promoting a site with ripped pics either. Don't forget you're dealing with a sponsor that steals content and has no model releases. (This is a generic comment, I have no idea whether Franck's sponsor specifically does this)

02-16-2007, 10:31 AM	#200
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	I can see two potential problems here- 1. Copyright violation. The copyright most likely rests with the person holding the camera, unless they have signed a form saying they assign or relinquish copyright. 2. Use of a likeness without a release. The person(s) featured in the photos ARE identifiable (eventually) and their image is being used for commercial gain.