GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Too Much Media (NATS) announcement regarding verified joins and instant payouts (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=683448)

DarkJedi 12-05-2006 03:59 AM

200 stole.. err, unverified signups.

:321GFY

Brujah 12-05-2006 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konda (Post 11458815)
Why do people blame NATS for a 'shave function' that FlashCash always had?

FC wanted to use NATS, and NATS told them 'if you want to use our software, you need to show all numbers, including the ones that you don't payout your affilites for'.

If you don't like this you need to complain to FC, not to NATS...

Not all questions should be considered blame. Some good questions in here are just that.. questions. If someone knows the answer, then it's nice to hear it.

Tuga 12-05-2006 05:12 AM

PBucksJohn is repeating the same thing over and over again, and some stupid fucks still dont get it.

Go fuck yourself and start shit on the FC foruns! Idiots.

SlamDesigns 12-05-2006 05:42 AM

Ok, read it all...again and again...and still don't 100% understand. I will say this though, if a program is using a feature that allows them to basically steal money from you...I would suggest an industry wide boycott of that sponsor. That's just some shady shit there, my friends.

Jace 12-05-2006 05:50 AM

ok, I have read this thread over and over again and I totally understand everything but one thing, when a signup is declared "unverified", does that mean the customer didn't pay any money? and if he did pay money why didn't the affiliate get the payout?

basically, who gets the money from an unverified sale?

darksoul 12-05-2006 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 11459652)
ok, I have read this thread over and over again and I totally understand everything but one thing, when a signup is declared "unverified", does that mean the customer didn't pay any money? and if he did pay money why didn't the affiliate get the payout?

basically, who gets the money from an unverified sale?

Its been said.
Even if the customer pays and its marked as unverified
the sponsor will keep the money unless by some miracle it goes into verified mode.

Legal shaving.

Jace 12-05-2006 05:57 AM

I have a solution (even though the can of worms has already been opened)...just remove that "unverified signups" column...totally make it go away

problem solved

darksoul 12-05-2006 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 11459685)
I have a solution (even though the can of worms has already been opened)...just remove that "unverified signups" column...totally make it go away

problem solved

not really
its already out there, turning it off now wont make the problem go away

Jace 12-05-2006 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul (Post 11459691)
not really
its already out there, turning it off now wont make the problem go away

that column should have never even been put there, that was a really stupid move on the part of flashcash, if it had never been there no one would have ever known

I know the flashcash guys, and they are good people, I can't see them taking advantage of this.....but still, that column shouod have never been there

darksoul 12-05-2006 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 11459701)
that column should have never even been put there, that was a really stupid move on the part of flashcash, if it had never been there no one would have ever known

I know the flashcash guys, and they are good people, I can't see them taking advantage of this.....but still, that column shouod have never been there

well, thats moot right now. They did it and here they are.
I'm sure they're top notch guys however the percents I see some people
have with unverified signups makes you wonder.

Jace 12-05-2006 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul (Post 11459709)
well, thats moot right now. They did it and here they are.
I'm sure they're top notch guys however the percents I see some people
have with unverified signups makes you wonder.

i have no clue if they are "top notch", and no, they have never bought me a drink....LOL....but yes, I agree, the amount of unverified signups is alarming

darksoul 12-05-2006 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 11459713)
i have no clue if they are "top notch",
they have never bought me a drink

makes sense :)

BVF 12-05-2006 06:13 AM

Quick, somebody post some old pics of Halcyon and Tassy to distract the angry sheep with all the pink and fruityness! HURRY!!

tASSy 12-05-2006 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF (Post 11459742)
Quick, somebody post some old pics of Halcyon and Tassy to distract the angry sheep with all the pink and fruityness! HURRY!!

maybe just halcyon pics... seeing as how he's really the beefcake of FLASHCA$H now! :thumbsup

BlackCrayon 12-05-2006 06:40 AM

i don't have time to read the whole thread but if people are losing out on sign ups because of this 'instant payout' crap which obviously caters to mostly small webmasters who need money instantly to pay bills then that is just sad. if you can't wait 2 weeks to get paid, get out of the biz. you suck.

thedoc says processors don't scrub for shit. why do some program admns see so many declines in their stats in ccbill for example then? i always thought that webmasters should be able to see declines as well as approved sales, not sure that this is exactly what that is though. this seems like a scrub beyond the declines/approves and to cause everyone to suffer through it because some poor webmasters need the money right away, well sucks.

Snake Doctor 12-05-2006 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi (Post 11458072)
Fuck you, you fat fuck.

I have talked "privately" to program owners MANY times.
They were not able to help me.

I'm losing money here and I should give a fuck whether someone looks bad or
not? Perhaps if they weren't involved in this bullshit they wouldn't look so bad, eh?

It's hilarious how all the program owners jump in and defend NATS while affiliates try to get any questions answered.

I don't know what my weight has to do with you being an attention whore, but I guess since you don't have anything real to respond with you have to go with an insult an 8 year old would use.

You've talked privately to other program owners?
Who gives a flying fuck, that has nothing to do with this situation.

You'll either talk to flashcash and work it out, or you won't and you can send your traffic elsewhere.
All you're doing here is trying to make flashcash and nats look bad. You won't get shit resolved in a GFY thread and you know it.

You're just a pathetic attention whore who likes to make program owners look bad.

RBC 12-05-2006 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn (Post 11457619)
25% is way off from the norm. The norm is far far far lower. Again, if someone has a question that is answerable, I have no problem doing so. "Why is it 25% for me?" I can't, they would have to speak with FlashCash about that.

THIS IS THE ANSWER!
Thank you for you gentle hint John.
:thumbsup

RawAlex 12-05-2006 12:49 PM

Hopefully John will make it back to this thread to answer some of the level headed and clear questions that have been posted.

director 10-28-2008 02:57 PM

WHat a fucking waste of money
 
We had installed the new Nats 4 The other day and it has been full of problems every since..will not allow us to change or add processors..... giving us code errors all over the place and must have ..tried to contact support on ICQ and with tickets about 30 times and they are just fucking plain useless...

So much hype about this bull shit program..... it not worth the fucking money they are charging,, just another piece of shit program with useless support

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 10-28-2008 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by director (Post 14965291)
We had installed the new Nats 4 The other day and it has been full of problems every since..will not allow us to change or add processors..... giving us code errors all over the place and must have ..tried to contact support on ICQ and with tickets about 30 times and they are just fucking plain useless...

So much hype about this bull shit program..... it not worth the fucking money they are charging,, just another piece of shit program with useless support

LOL

You fail at internetting, NATS is far from being worthless piece of shit, maybe you shouldn't suck so bad at installing it. :2 cents:

FlexxAeon 10-28-2008 03:12 PM

cue the pic of doc & marty....

jcsike 09-24-2009 05:19 PM

took me 20 min to find this thread, classic

NetHorse 09-24-2009 05:54 PM

Well since this thread was bumped, I have a slightly OT question....

Can program owners shave sales using NATS?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123