9/11 Conspiracy? Yes or No ? <Poll> & Loose Change 2<Vid> - GoFuckYourself.com

DEA - banned for life · 09-11-2006, 06:55 AM

Watch Loose Change Part 2 Conspircay Video

Do you think 9/11 was a conspiracy ? Yes or No ?

madawgz · 09-11-2006, 06:56 AM

i can tell you this, the us government had a hand in 9/11

i cant tell you anything else or i will be killed :|

StuartD · 09-11-2006, 06:57 AM

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/...oll/index.html

pathmaster · 09-11-2006, 07:00 AM

The USA is to blame for pretty umch all attacks against it.

I gurantee you if they pulled out all presence from the middle east there wouldnt be any majoe terror attcks anymore.

I was watching a documentary a few days ago about Iran and a third world war. It's coming. Once these places have nukes be very very afraid.

Konda · 09-11-2006, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DEA

Watch Loose Change Part 2 Conspircay Video

Do you think 9/11 was a conspiracy ? Yes or No ?

I think there is more to it, but 99% of what Loose Change says has already been proofed to be not true:

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
This site will show you scene by scene, minute by minute that Loose Change is wrong in 99% of what it claims.

They showed Loose Change 2 on national TV yesterday here in The Netherlands. Before that they had a documentary that already prooved most things mentioned in Loose Change are incomplete or incorrect.

12clicks · 09-11-2006, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pathmaster

The USA is to blame for pretty umch all attacks against it.

I gurantee you if they pulled out all presence from the middle east there wouldnt be any majoe terror attcks anymore.

right. shall we return the muslim scum within our borders to their muslim homeland when we pull out of the middle east as well?

09-11-2006, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DEA

Watch Loose Change Part 2 Conspircay Video

Do you think 9/11 was a conspiracy ? Yes or No ?

TiMeLiNe PLEASE!!!!!!!!!

DEA - banned for life · 09-11-2006, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konda

I think there is more to it, but 99% of what Loose Change says has already been proofed to be not true:

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
This site will show you scene by scene, minute by minute that Loose Change is wrong in 99% of what it claims.

They showed Loose Change 2 on national TV yesterday here in The Netherlands. Before that they had a documentary that already prooved most things mentioned in Loose Change are incomplete or incorrect.

that guide is crap..all lies ..all lies i tell you

Scootermuze · 09-11-2006, 07:21 AM

Scootermuze · 09-11-2006, 12:19 PM

Just watched a reporter (eye witness) being interviewed on CNN..

He said he remembers the American Airlines plane flying in and hitting the pentagon..

Then they played a video where he was interviewed on the day that it happened..

He said it looked like a cruise missile with wings..

It was funny listening to him try to explain his way out of it..

Splum · 09-11-2006, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konda

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
This site will show you scene by scene, minute by minute that Loose Change is wrong in 99% of what it claims. They showed Loose Change 2 on national TV yesterday here in The Netherlands. Before that they had a documentary that already prooved most things mentioned in Loose Change are incomplete or incorrect.

Excellent link! Just donated $500 to this guy.

Dirty F · 09-11-2006, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

All flights were cancelled. All signs looked like that shortly after the hijackings. Come on man, thats not even worth posting.

Scootermuze · 09-11-2006, 12:44 PM

This is somewhat interesting...

Was watching Bush at the pentagon and his eyes were constantly blinking..

Body language experts say that shifty eyes and blinking eyes can indicate deception.

Now let's hear how he was just holding back the tears..

xNetworx · 09-11-2006, 12:48 PM

Durka Durka Jihad

madawgz · 09-11-2006, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpporn

Durka Durka Jihad

DURKA!

StuBradley · 09-11-2006, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konda

I think there is more to it, but 99% of what Loose Change says has already been proofed to be not true:

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
This site will show you scene by scene, minute by minute that Loose Change is wrong in 99% of what it claims.

They showed Loose Change 2 on national TV yesterday here in The Netherlands. Before that they had a documentary that already prooved most things mentioned in Loose Change are incomplete or incorrect.

I read that for about 20 seconds. Typical government bullshit and backpeddling.

Scootermuze · 09-11-2006, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

All flights were cancelled. All signs looked like that shortly after the hijackings. Come on man, thats not even worth posting.

All signs looked like that??

Notice all flights prior to the grounding show that they departed...
Flt 77 would have departed PRIOR TO THE GROUNDING..
It doesn't show as departed...

Now.. dazzle us with another reason..

ServerGenius · 09-11-2006, 01:52 PM

Loose change vid is so full of bullshit it's not even funny anymore. Yesterday
there was a program on Dutch TV that analized the video and showed it to
demolition and aircraft engineers and none of what they claim is factual.

The damage they show on the pentagon isn't nearly all the damage. The
parts that could be identified are INDEED of a boeing airplane. Those planes
used different brands of the same part. So while they say it's not it turned
out that there are indeed boeings that have those type of parts.

The explosions in the twin towers couldn't been places. Controlled demolition
explode stuff from ground level and use the weigth of the building help collapse.
If explosives would have been placed they would have gone off instantly simply
because of the temperature caused by the fire. You would need WAY too many
charges to do it from the top which would have taken 2 years to put there and
an inmense amount of cables and electric boards to connect all. They would
have gone of at a temperature of 320 degrees Centigrades.

The "explosions" that loose change shows are bolts breaking which mount
the steel beams together. Because they got bend and twisted at the top.
Those bolts exploded and caused the building to collapse because of the
tension. That was the structure its weak point. It was strong enough to
stand inmense compression forces but not if would twist bend like it did.

The thing that 100% WAS controlled demolition was the collapse of building 7.
That went down from the bottom and according the guy who owned a
controlled demolition company for 27 years that was without a shadow of a
doubt caused by controlled demolition.

The end conclusion of the research said it is very likely that the US goverment
was well informed and aware that the attacks would take place. They just
didn't seem to have even tried to prevent them.

aico · 09-11-2006, 01:54 PM

Our Gov't is way too stupid and inept to be able to pull something like that off.

ServerGenius · 09-11-2006, 01:58 PM

You can view that Dutch TV program online but it's in Dutch only.

The program is called Zembla here's the link to watch it.

http://www.uitzendinggemist.nl/index...a 372b7ff6f23

Scootermuze · 09-11-2006, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ServerGenius

........
The end conclusion of the research said it is very likely that the US goverment
was well informed and aware that the attacks would take place. They just
didn't seem to have even tried to prevent them.

I can go with that..

Dirty F · 09-11-2006, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

All signs looked like that??

Notice all flights prior to the grounding show that they departed...
Flt 77 would have departed PRIOR TO THE GROUNDING..
It doesn't show as departed...

Now.. dazzle us with another reason..

Ok, well, you got me. I mean that pic is clearly more important that the 60 people inside that plane, 6 crewmembers, tons of people who saw the plane leaving the airport, people who seen the plane in the air and the air traffic controllers. No seriously, you convinced me.

Dirty F · 09-11-2006, 02:07 PM

Its totally fucking uber retarded to think that they manage to fly a plane in the wtc in a way that the bombs didnt go off right away and then manage to let the bombs explode from exactly the floors below the floor where the plane entered. And they quickly disabled the bombs above that floor. Right.

One must be mentally challenged to actually believe that.

BergyK · 09-11-2006, 02:15 PM

B ig time conspiracy! I think the gov. did have a finger in it, I thought that from the moment we were attacked.

BergyK · 09-11-2006, 02:15 PM

B ig time conspiracy! I think the gov. did have a finger in it, I thought that from the moment we were attacked.

ServerGenius · 09-11-2006, 02:32 PM

Oh b.t.w. the claim a boeing couldn't make such a turn at that speed before
it crashed into the pentagon is bullshit. They proofed it could by succesfully
performing that manouvre in a real pilot flightsimulator by a person who was
a below average hobby pilot. He succeeded to make the turn at that speed
and hitting the pentogan on ALL 3 attempts. Check the program link to see
it happen.

notabook · 09-11-2006, 02:33 PM

9-11 almost certainly had some conspiracy elements to it, but I don’t think the USG was behind it. Whoever took down Building #7 is the most likely culprit who had their hands in the jar so to speak; it clearly wasn’t the “tear-ore-ests” behind #7’s demise. Even FEMA’s commissioned report was inconclusive of how #7 fell because of the lack of evidence (by the time they got to investigate the building remains, the majority of the structural steel had been sold and removed from the premises).

K R I S T E N · 09-11-2006, 02:46 PM

LOOSE CHANGE is my favorite documentary - makes you THINK

Overload · 09-11-2006, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

Its totally fucking uber retarded to think that they manage to fly a plane in the wtc in a way that the bombs didnt go off right away and then manage to let the bombs explode from exactly the floors below the floor where the plane entered. And they quickly disabled the bombs above that floor. Right.

One must be mentally challenged to actually believe that.

sigh ... you are not really reading what people reply, right ? those explosives used for controlled demolition are NOT triggered by fire or massive impact, but by electric pulse ... got it now ? but you didnt watch loose change anyways, so why try to fill ya with facts ? ... btw, did you notice : all passengers of the shanksville plane have been identified by DNA testing ... oops, but NONE of the terrorists is on their list ? did they get vaporized like the 6 tons of steel engines in the pentagon ? yeah, that must be it ...

John69 · 09-11-2006, 03:41 PM

i vote yes, bush and co did it/knew about it.

Dirty F · 09-11-2006, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Overload

but by electric pulse ...

And that still works after a plane crashed into it? Ever seen those wires?

Overload · 09-11-2006, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

And that still works after a plane crashed into it? Ever seen those wires?

how dumb can one be ?! if the wires are tied together from the GROUND, its pretty easy to see why upper devices didnt go off, right ? ignorant !!! if you cut a circuit at a certain point there is no longer an electric pulse served ... and only very few floors have been affected by the planes impact ... you better go back to school man

... or even better, finally WATCH THAT VIDEO before you crap around with bully ...

Overload · 09-11-2006, 03:53 PM

and Franck ... explain the fall of WTC7 to me ok ?

with proof facts man, not just your official lines crap ...
scientific facts please how come that building came down ...
to a convenient lil pile ...

madawgz · 09-11-2006, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Our Gov't is way too stupid and inept to be able to pull something like that off.

okay well bush really doesnt have the smarts to pull that off

its the guys working behind him who did it, the guys who pull all the strings...

09-11-2006, 06:55 AM	#1
DEA - banned for life V.I.P. Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: InYour Head Posts: 7,886	9/11 Conspiracy? Yes or No ? <Poll> & Loose Change 2<Vid> Watch Loose Change Part 2 Conspircay Video Do you think 9/11 was a conspiracy ? Yes or No ?

09-11-2006, 06:56 AM	#2
madawgz 8.8.8.8 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Noordermarkt Posts: 30,509	i can tell you this, the us government had a hand in 9/11 i cant tell you anything else or i will be killed :\| __________________ TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.

09-11-2006, 06:57 AM	#3
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/...oll/index.html __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

09-11-2006, 01:52 PM	#18
ServerGenius Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 9,377	Loose change vid is so full of bullshit it's not even funny anymore. Yesterday there was a program on Dutch TV that analized the video and showed it to demolition and aircraft engineers and none of what they claim is factual. The damage they show on the pentagon isn't nearly all the damage. The parts that could be identified are INDEED of a boeing airplane. Those planes used different brands of the same part. So while they say it's not it turned out that there are indeed boeings that have those type of parts. The explosions in the twin towers couldn't been places. Controlled demolition explode stuff from ground level and use the weigth of the building help collapse. If explosives would have been placed they would have gone off instantly simply because of the temperature caused by the fire. You would need WAY too many charges to do it from the top which would have taken 2 years to put there and an inmense amount of cables and electric boards to connect all. They would have gone of at a temperature of 320 degrees Centigrades. The "explosions" that loose change shows are bolts breaking which mount the steel beams together. Because they got bend and twisted at the top. Those bolts exploded and caused the building to collapse because of the tension. That was the structure its weak point. It was strong enough to stand inmense compression forces but not if would twist bend like it did. The thing that 100% WAS controlled demolition was the collapse of building 7. That went down from the bottom and according the guy who owned a controlled demolition company for 27 years that was without a shadow of a doubt caused by controlled demolition. The end conclusion of the research said it is very likely that the US goverment was well informed and aware that the attacks would take place. They just didn't seem to have even tried to prevent them. __________________ \| http://www.sinnerscash.com/ \| ICQ: 370820 \| Skype: SinnersCash \| AdultWhosWho \|

09-11-2006, 01:58 PM	#20
ServerGenius Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 9,377	You can view that Dutch TV program online but it's in Dutch only. The program is called Zembla here's the link to watch it. http://www.uitzendinggemist.nl/index...a 372b7ff6f23 __________________ \| http://www.sinnerscash.com/ \| ICQ: 370820 \| Skype: SinnersCash \| AdultWhosWho \|

09-11-2006, 07:00 AM	#4
pathmaster So Fucking Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 125	The USA is to blame for pretty umch all attacks against it. I gurantee you if they pulled out all presence from the middle east there wouldnt be any majoe terror attcks anymore. I was watching a documentary a few days ago about Iran and a third world war. It's coming. Once these places have nukes be very very afraid.

09-11-2006, 07:21 AM	#9
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513

09-11-2006, 12:19 PM	#10
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	Just watched a reporter (eye witness) being interviewed on CNN.. He said he remembers the American Airlines plane flying in and hitting the pentagon.. Then they played a video where he was interviewed on the day that it happened.. He said it looked like a cruise missile with wings.. It was funny listening to him try to explain his way out of it..

09-11-2006, 12:44 PM	#13
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	This is somewhat interesting... Was watching Bush at the pentagon and his eyes were constantly blinking.. Body language experts say that shifty eyes and blinking eyes can indicate deception. Now let's hear how he was just holding back the tears..

09-11-2006, 12:48 PM	#14
xNetworx So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Whore Island Posts: 14,445	Durka Durka Jihad

09-11-2006, 01:54 PM	#19
aico Moo Moo Cow Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington State Posts: 14,748	Our Gov't is way too stupid and inept to be able to pull something like that off.

09-11-2006, 02:07 PM	#23
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Its totally fucking uber retarded to think that they manage to fly a plane in the wtc in a way that the bombs didnt go off right away and then manage to let the bombs explode from exactly the floors below the floor where the plane entered. And they quickly disabled the bombs above that floor. Right. One must be mentally challenged to actually believe that.

09-11-2006, 02:15 PM	#24
BergyK Etology Project Manager Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: NoneOfUrBiz Posts: 1,001	B ig time conspiracy! I think the gov. did have a finger in it, I thought that from the moment we were attacked.

09-11-2006, 02:32 PM	#26
ServerGenius Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 9,377	Oh b.t.w. the claim a boeing couldn't make such a turn at that speed before it crashed into the pentagon is bullshit. They proofed it could by succesfully performing that manouvre in a real pilot flightsimulator by a person who was a below average hobby pilot. He succeeded to make the turn at that speed and hitting the pentogan on ALL 3 attempts. Check the program link to see it happen. __________________ \| http://www.sinnerscash.com/ \| ICQ: 370820 \| Skype: SinnersCash \| AdultWhosWho \|

09-11-2006, 02:33 PM	#27
notabook Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Not a Library! Posts: 9,748	9-11 almost certainly had some conspiracy elements to it, but I don’t think the USG was behind it. Whoever took down Building #7 is the most likely culprit who had their hands in the jar so to speak; it clearly wasn’t the “tear-ore-ests” behind #7’s demise. Even FEMA’s commissioned report was inconclusive of how #7 fell because of the lack of evidence (by the time they got to investigate the building remains, the majority of the structural steel had been sold and removed from the premises). __________________

09-11-2006, 02:46 PM	#28
K R I S T E N Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,438	LOOSE CHANGE is my favorite documentary - makes you THINK __________________ K R I S T E N KSquaredDynamics, Inc. ~ Taking Care of {YOUR} Business

09-11-2006, 03:41 PM	#30
John69 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 942	i vote yes, bush and co did it/knew about it. __________________ DARKSOUL: thanks but no thanks, your over priced.

09-11-2006, 03:53 PM	#33
Overload Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Beck's City, North Teutonia Posts: 3,185	and Franck ... explain the fall of WTC7 to me ok ? with proof facts man, not just your official lines crap ... scientific facts please how come that building came down ... to a convenient lil pile ... __________________ There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion. Last edited by Overload; 09-11-2006 at 03:55 PM..