How to beat any casino - it works ! - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

elron · 09-06-2006, 07:33 AM

fifty chances to beat casinos

Verbal · 09-06-2006, 07:35 AM

There is no such thing as a 50% spot.

MetaMan · 09-06-2006, 07:36 AM

the oddds are never 50/50 the casino always has a small advantage, 00 and 0 make all the difference, that is why it is there to give the casino a statistical advantage.

you will be maxed out by the max bet at the tabled.

your plan has been around since the begging of gambling and it is the exact reason why they have max bets.

do you think you invented this plan or someting?

Kevsh · 09-06-2006, 07:36 AM

Oh god, not this theory again.

Read my lips:
IT DOESN'T WORK

I'll say it again:
IT DOESN'T WORK

Why? Roulette is not played on paper and the odds mean nothing. Each roll there is am (approx) 50/50 chance of red/black. So while doing the math may tell you that it hitting red 10 times in a row is statistically nearly impossible, it will happen and you're shit out of luck (and money).

Don't waste your time/money.
You'll lose and lose badly eventually.

elron · 09-06-2006, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

the oddds are never 50/50 the casino always has a small advantage, 00 and 0 make all the difference, that is why it is there to give the casino a statistical advantage.

you will be maxed out by the max bet at the tabled.

your plan has been around since the begging of gambling and it is the exact reason why they have max bets.

do you think you invented this plan or someting?

i never said go and do it , if you'll read my thread again you'll somehow find out that i said it's by theory , never told anyone it will work .

MetaMan · 09-06-2006, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron

i never said go and do it , if you'll read my thread again you'll somehow find out that i said it's by theory , never told anyone it will work .

"never told anyone it will work"

your thread title is: "How to beat any casino - it works !"

what is the point of a theory that does not work?

Quick Buck · 09-06-2006, 07:43 AM

the odds of you losing 100 times in a row out of 200 spins are exactly the same as you losing 2 times in a row out of 4 spins... exactly 50% (not counting 0 and 00 for the sake of argument).

The problem with this theory is the idea that somehow the fact that the spins happen "in a row" has a magical effect on the wheel.

Out of 10 spins:
win win win win win lose lose lose lose lose
or
win lose win lose win lose win lose win lose

the second one "feels" more likely but the odds are exactly the same.

You spend your money trying to beat roulette, i'll keep investing in porn

MetaMan · 09-06-2006, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck

the odds of you losing 100 times in a row out of 200 spins are exactly the same as you losing 2 times in a row out of 4 spins... exactly 50% (not counting 0 and 00 for the sake of argument).

wtf aare you people talking about THERE IS a 0 or 00, most casinos have both some have 1 of the 2.

how can you take it out "for the sake off the argument"

you take them out and you are no longer playing roulette.

Quick Buck · 09-06-2006, 07:52 AM

i agree metaman, my point was only that the odds of landing 100 reds in a row is exactly the same as getting 50 reds and then 50 blacks.

MetaMan · 09-06-2006, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck

i agree metaman, my point was only that the odds of landing 100 reds in a row is exactly the same as getting 50 reds and then 50 blacks.

yes you are totally correct,

i am not aruging with your point, just pointing out funny the thread is, there is no basis for argument in the first place because it does not work.

polle54 · 09-06-2006, 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron

but you wont lose 50 bets in a row , you know that .

How much money do you have laying around?

do you have $10k to play fore then you can do this:

and the win is $10 pr round.

10 + 20 + 40 + 80 + 160 + 320 + 640 + 1280 + 2560 + 5120

You have now been wrong 10 times in a row.
You have lost app. $10k and you can't win them back because you dont have yet another $10k.

If you had done nothing but winning you would have won at best $100

The risk does not add up and you WILL lose your money by playing like this irl.

Even if you had insifficiant funds the table has a limit, and who the fuck want's to win 10 bucks if you have $50k?

Martin Gale made this system and to some extend it does have an effect but if you know a little about programming make a simulation and see how radically it fails.

polle54 · 09-06-2006, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron

before you call someone idiot change your sig to something that will make you look less ridiculous . How can skimmed tgp traffic be possibly quality traffic ?

Oh yeah and I might need to comment on this as well

I have people buying for $10k+/month traffic and they have done it recurring for some months now...

Unless they are as stupid as you and just throwing money of the window, they do make a good profit from it.

It's qaulity of it's kind.

MattOT · 09-06-2006, 07:58 AM

its all about the blackjack !!!!!

Solid Bob · 09-06-2006, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron

but you wont lose 50 bets in a row , you know that .

It happens all the time. It's called variance, look it up, stfu and find a new "system".

rhizome · 09-06-2006, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck

i agree metaman, my point was only that the odds of landing 100 reds in a row is exactly the same as getting 50 reds and then 50 blacks.

True but also misleading. Let's say the table limit will allow you to double 100 times and you always bets on black. 100 reds in a row will bust you but 50 reds followed by 50 blacks will not. Neither will 37 reds followed by 63 blacks or red, black, red, black, etc. In fact the only unique combination that will bust you in 100 spins is 100 reds in a row. The millions of other unique combinations will all work in your favor.

notabook · 09-06-2006, 08:04 AM

More jewpidity from Elron. Awesome! =)

polle54 · 09-06-2006, 08:06 AM

Btw I might add what fails in your brain when you think that the martin gale system works

Your brain (limit people like you) will always try to create a "pattern" for what they fail to understand.

You see this a bullet proof because you can't see that you have 50% each and every time and the varians don't nescasarily evens up in 10 rounds nor at 50.

Now sit down with a cube.

let 1-2-3 be black and let 4-5-6 be red.

make 2000 strokes and you will get a somewhat picture of the way it varies.

godisdead · 09-06-2006, 09:31 AM

A friend of mine lost several thousand bucks with that system when he was still at school. He couldn't even pay for the gas to get back home.

09-06-2006, 07:43 AM	#57
Quick Buck Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Free-Trials.......... Weekly-Payouts..... 100+Sites Posts: 1,026	the odds of you losing 100 times in a row out of 200 spins are exactly the same as you losing 2 times in a row out of 4 spins... exactly 50% (not counting 0 and 00 for the sake of argument). The problem with this theory is the idea that somehow the fact that the spins happen "in a row" has a magical effect on the wheel. Out of 10 spins: win win win win win lose lose lose lose lose or win lose win lose win lose win lose win lose the second one "feels" more likely but the odds are exactly the same. You spend your money trying to beat roulette, i'll keep investing in porn __________________ $50 FREE TRIALS! Every Day til 2008!!! Only at QuickBuck

09-06-2006, 07:52 AM	#59
Quick Buck Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Free-Trials.......... Weekly-Payouts..... 100+Sites Posts: 1,026	i agree metaman, my point was only that the odds of landing 100 reds in a row is exactly the same as getting 50 reds and then 50 blacks. __________________ $50 FREE TRIALS! Every Day til 2008!!! Only at QuickBuck

09-06-2006, 07:58 AM	#63
MattOT Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 901	its all about the blackjack !!!!! __________________ Matt www.onlytease.com / www.onlymelanie.com / www.onlycarla.com/ Sponsor program at www.otcash.com ICQ: 235015328

09-06-2006, 08:04 AM	#66
notabook Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Not a Library! Posts: 9,748	More jewpidity from Elron. Awesome! =) __________________

09-06-2006, 08:06 AM	#67
polle54 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: The Beach Posts: 4,626	Btw I might add what fails in your brain when you think that the martin gale system works Your brain (limit people like you) will always try to create a "pattern" for what they fail to understand. You see this a bullet proof because you can't see that you have 50% each and every time and the varians don't nescasarily evens up in 10 rounds nor at 50. Now sit down with a cube. let 1-2-3 be black and let 4-5-6 be red. make 2000 strokes and you will get a somewhat picture of the way it varies. __________________ ICQ# 143561781

09-06-2006, 07:33 AM	#51
elron Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,553	fifty chances to beat casinos

09-06-2006, 07:35 AM	#52
Verbal Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 3,420	There is no such thing as a 50% spot.

09-06-2006, 07:36 AM	#53
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	the oddds are never 50/50 the casino always has a small advantage, 00 and 0 make all the difference, that is why it is there to give the casino a statistical advantage. you will be maxed out by the max bet at the tabled. your plan has been around since the begging of gambling and it is the exact reason why they have max bets. do you think you invented this plan or someting?

09-06-2006, 07:36 AM	#54
Kevsh Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: TO Posts: 8,619	Oh god, not this theory again. Read my lips: IT DOESN'T WORK I'll say it again: IT DOESN'T WORK Why? Roulette is not played on paper and the odds mean nothing. Each roll there is am (approx) 50/50 chance of red/black. So while doing the math may tell you that it hitting red 10 times in a row is statistically nearly impossible, it will happen and you're shit out of luck (and money). Don't waste your time/money. You'll lose and lose badly eventually.

09-06-2006, 09:31 AM	#68
godisdead Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,213	A friend of mine lost several thousand bucks with that system when he was still at school. He couldn't even pay for the gas to get back home. __________________ $40 Flat Fee 70% Revshare YEAH THOSE ARE CRAZY PAYOUTS coming soon Crazy Payouts