TIME Magazine Cover Story about 9/11 conspiracies - GoFuckYourself.com

chshkt · 09-06-2006, 09:44 PM

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...531304,00.html

Why The 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away
Turns out, we need grand theories to make sense of grand events, or the world just seems too random

By LEV GROSSMAN

Posted Sunday, Sep. 3, 2006
Take a look, if you can stand it, at video footage of the World Trade Center collapsing. Your eye will naturally jump to the top of the screen, where huge fountains of dark debris erupt out of the falling towers. But fight your natural instincts. Look farther down, at the stories that haven't collapsed yet.

In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it actually blew out the windows. And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s and the ensuing fires. They were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs you see on film are the detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks.

People who believe the second explanation live in a very different world from those who believe the first. In world No. 2, al-Qaeda is not responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center. The U.S. government is. The Pentagon was not hit by a commercial jet; it was hit by a cruise missile. United Flight 93 did not crash after its occupants rushed the cockpit; it was deliberately taken down by a U.S. Air Force fighter. The entire catastrophe was planned and executed by federal officials in order to provide the U.S. with a pretext for going to war in the Middle East and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and extending the power of the Bush Administration.

The population of world No. 2 is larger than you might think. A Scripps-Howard poll of 1,010 adults last month found that 36% of Americans consider it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that government officials either allowed the attacks to be carried out or carried out the attacks themselves. Thirty-six percent adds up to a lot of people. This is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a mainstream political reality.

Although the 9/11 Truth Movement, as many conspiracy believers refer to their passion, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media, it is flourishing on the Internet. One of the most popular conspiracy videos online is Loose Change, a 90-min. blizzard of statistics, photographs, documents, eyewitness accounts and expert testimony set to a trippy hip-hop backbeat. It's designed to pick apart, point by point, the conventional narrative of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001.

For all its amateur production values--it was created by a pair of industrious twentysomethings using a laptop, pizza money and footage scavenged from the Internet--Loose Change is a compelling experience. Take the section about the attack on the Pentagon. As the film points out--and this is a tent-pole issue among 9/11 conspiracists--the crash site doesn't look right. There's not enough damage. The hole smashed in the Pentagon's outer wall was 75 ft. wide, but a Boeing 757 has a 124-ft. wingspan. Why wasn't the hole wider? Why does it look so neat?

Page 1 of 3 1 | 2 | 3 Next >>

From the Sep. 11, 2006 issue of TIME magazine

baycouples · 09-06-2006, 09:48 PM

If you look at the simple facts - you will know that towers didn't fall on their own. The speed of the fall was almost as fast as a free drop. And the hightest tempeture at which the jet fuel burns is not even close to the the steel's melting point. Simple facts.

BradM · 09-06-2006, 09:49 PM

That's as close as Time can get to saying "We think it was a farse, too."

Phoenix · 09-06-2006, 09:49 PM

they are suck cock suckers...and everyone just gobbles their shit up

here comes franck

shake · 09-06-2006, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baycouples

If you look at the simple facts - you will know that towers didn't fall on their own. The speed of the fall was almost as fast as a free drop. And the hightest tempeture at which the jet fuel burns is not even close to the the steel's melting point. Simple facts.

I think there was something called a "thermite reation" which is where the combonation of steel and aluminum will actually burn at a temp close to that of the sun. It is a common and well known reaction

All that is needed for this "thermite" to burn is steel, aluminum, and a heat source high enough to start the reaction (jet fuel) I've read some articles about this, if you search on thermite 911 on google, you'll find it too..

Here is one such article:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.htm

Dirty F · 09-06-2006, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baycouples

If you look at the simple facts - you will know that towers didn't fall on their own. The speed of the fall was almost as fast as a free drop. And the hightest tempeture at which the jet fuel burns is not even close to the the steel's melting point. Simple facts.

Who's talking about melting? Steel weakens before it melts and it obviously weakened enough to let the building collapse. Is this really the evidence for you they planted explosives?

Dirty F · 09-06-2006, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

they are suck cock suckers...and everyone just gobbles their shit up

here comes franck

Youre the biggest retard on this board when it comes to conspiracy shit. Totally insane.

Ad3pt · 09-06-2006, 10:05 PM

did that issue come with a tinfoil hat?

Big_Red · 09-06-2006, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shake

I think there was something called a "thermite reation" which is where the combonation of steel and aluminum will actually burn at a temp close to that of the sun. It is a common and well known reaction

All that is needed for this "thermite" to burn is steel, aluminum, and a heat source high enough to start the reaction (jet fuel) I've read some articles about this, if you search on thermite 911 on google, you'll find it too..

Here is one such article:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.htm

Nah, it didnt need to "burn" the steel. Just heat it up a bit to make it plyable, then snap.

stickyfingerz · 09-06-2006, 10:40 PM

Anyone that believes the towers were detonated has issues...

Phoenix · 09-06-2006, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

Youre the biggest retard on this board when it comes to conspiracy shit. Totally insane.

lol...thanks man

09-06-2006, 09:44 PM	#1
chshkt Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,500	TIME Magazine Cover Story about 9/11 conspiracies http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...531304,00.html Why The 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away Turns out, we need grand theories to make sense of grand events, or the world just seems too random By LEV GROSSMAN Posted Sunday, Sep. 3, 2006 Take a look, if you can stand it, at video footage of the World Trade Center collapsing. Your eye will naturally jump to the top of the screen, where huge fountains of dark debris erupt out of the falling towers. But fight your natural instincts. Look farther down, at the stories that haven't collapsed yet. In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it actually blew out the windows. And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s and the ensuing fires. They were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs you see on film are the detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks. People who believe the second explanation live in a very different world from those who believe the first. In world No. 2, al-Qaeda is not responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center. The U.S. government is. The Pentagon was not hit by a commercial jet; it was hit by a cruise missile. United Flight 93 did not crash after its occupants rushed the cockpit; it was deliberately taken down by a U.S. Air Force fighter. The entire catastrophe was planned and executed by federal officials in order to provide the U.S. with a pretext for going to war in the Middle East and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and extending the power of the Bush Administration. The population of world No. 2 is larger than you might think. A Scripps-Howard poll of 1,010 adults last month found that 36% of Americans consider it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that government officials either allowed the attacks to be carried out or carried out the attacks themselves. Thirty-six percent adds up to a lot of people. This is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a mainstream political reality. Although the 9/11 Truth Movement, as many conspiracy believers refer to their passion, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media, it is flourishing on the Internet. One of the most popular conspiracy videos online is Loose Change, a 90-min. blizzard of statistics, photographs, documents, eyewitness accounts and expert testimony set to a trippy hip-hop backbeat. It's designed to pick apart, point by point, the conventional narrative of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001. For all its amateur production values--it was created by a pair of industrious twentysomethings using a laptop, pizza money and footage scavenged from the Internet--Loose Change is a compelling experience. Take the section about the attack on the Pentagon. As the film points out--and this is a tent-pole issue among 9/11 conspiracists--the crash site doesn't look right. There's not enough damage. The hole smashed in the Pentagon's outer wall was 75 ft. wide, but a Boeing 757 has a 124-ft. wingspan. Why wasn't the hole wider? Why does it look so neat? Page 1 of 3 1 \| 2 \| 3 Next >> From the Sep. 11, 2006 issue of TIME magazine __________________ Start An Online Business, FREE!

09-06-2006, 09:49 PM	#4
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,472	they are suck cock suckers...and everyone just gobbles their shit up here comes franck __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

09-06-2006, 10:05 PM	#8
Ad3pt Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: California Posts: 476	did that issue come with a tinfoil hat? __________________ Don't look here for the joke. It's in your pants. South O - World Class surfer destination since 2001.

09-06-2006, 09:48 PM	#2
baycouples Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 1,341	If you look at the simple facts - you will know that towers didn't fall on their own. The speed of the fall was almost as fast as a free drop. And the hightest tempeture at which the jet fuel burns is not even close to the the steel's melting point. Simple facts.

09-06-2006, 09:49 PM	#3
BradM Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 1123,6536,5231 Posts: 3,397	That's as close as Time can get to saying "We think it was a farse, too."

09-06-2006, 10:40 PM	#10
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,984	Anyone that believes the towers were detonated has issues...