So ccbill is coming with improvements, while paycom stand still? - GoFuckYourself.com

justsexxx · 08-07-2006, 02:33 PM

CCBILL has much better/detailed stats. Especially for affiliates...

CCBILL made many improvements since last year...And now the Debit card addition etc...While paycom hasn't been improved since? well since when?

Also paycom EU sucks for smaller paysite owners..Since paycom can not send checks to affiliates, when the program owner is using paycomeu...

Agree or?

chupachups · 08-07-2006, 03:47 PM

Bump for a good thread

RRRED · 08-07-2006, 03:50 PM

Oh Andre, stop being a trouble maker

scottybuzz · 08-07-2006, 03:54 PM

buimpppppp

BradShaw · 08-07-2006, 03:56 PM

They are out racing.

rowan · 08-07-2006, 04:01 PM

I'd rather ccbill didn't make "improvements" to their affiliate stats, some of their more recent ones are quite bizarre.

gleem · 08-07-2006, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan

I'd rather ccbill didn't make "improvements" to their affiliate stats, some of their more recent ones are quite bizarre.

I agree, their improvements are a bitt nutty.

you'd think a company that size could take a page from any other sponsor program out there and make easy to read, and usefull stats, let alone a decent easy to use interface.

PR_Dave · 08-07-2006, 07:18 PM

I got a sneak peek at all the new Paycom stuff.

Going to kick major ass, epsecially after they announce who they teamed up with for stats.

KrisKross · 08-07-2006, 07:18 PM

I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.

crockett · 08-07-2006, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrisKross

I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.

great I wonder if it will come with the shav-O-matic option

gleem · 08-07-2006, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

great I wonder if it will come with the shav-O-matic option

hehe, can't wait till the MPA3 guys see that, maybe we can get another good NATS vs. MPA3 thread...

justsexxx · 08-08-2006, 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrisKross

I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.

Interesting

Jace · 08-08-2006, 04:43 AM

isn't paycom/epoch merging their backend affiliate system with MPA?

that alone would beat ccbill to the ground in a heartbeat....ccbill has the ultimate worst backend for affiliates in the world...if you ever want to know what NOT to do with a program backend, just log into the ccbill affiliate system

hell, I send ccbill site owners traffic consistantly and only like half the hits even register in their backend

Pimpin_J · 08-08-2006, 04:45 AM

Smelling dead meat...

David - PG · 08-08-2006, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justsexxx

Also paycom EU sucks for smaller paysite owners..Since paycom can not send checks to affiliates, when the program owner is using paycomeu...

Maybe Paycom just understands that it's not the small revshare programs where the big bucks are made.

andrej_NDC · 08-08-2006, 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Dave

I got a sneak peek at all the new Paycom stuff.

I wish it would be live already. I was told 6+ months ago that it won't take long anymore.

Gambit · 08-08-2006, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

isn't paycom/epoch merging their backend affiliate system with MPA?

that alone would beat ccbill to the ground in a heartbeat....ccbill has the ultimate worst backend for affiliates in the world...if you ever want to know what NOT to do with a program backend, just log into the ccbill affiliate system

hell, I send ccbill site owners traffic consistantly and only like half the hits even register in their backend

I agree with you on most points - but at least you can see which of the members you sent are active - unlike in Nats

justsexxx · 08-08-2006, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David - PG

Maybe Paycom just understands that it's not the small revshare programs where the big bucks are made.

I'm not speaking about my own program...But many good smaller niche sites do use ccbill....Also the check cutting is a big deal if you ask me...

And ftvcash, met-art etc are also using ccbill only...I remember a thread where Shap mentioned the same thing btw(paycom not improving)...Searching for the thread now...

But it looks like Paycom DOES improve...Looking forward to see their new stats backend

andrej_NDC · 08-08-2006, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David - PG

Maybe Paycom just understands that it's not the small revshare programs where the big bucks are made.

20 of such small programs at $50k monthly is $1000k. And I'm sure there are a lot more.

NastyGodCash · 08-08-2006, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrisKross

I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend.

it would be really great to got some better stats reports:-)

justsexxx · 08-08-2006, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gambit

I agree with you on most points - but at least you can see which of the members you sent are active - unlike in Nats

SO true!!! It's really a shame NATS doesn't offer this

gooddomains · 08-08-2006, 06:21 AM

paycom go

Roald · 08-08-2006, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace

isn't paycom/epoch merging their backend affiliate system with MPA?

Yes they do, this will be a huge improvement imo

David - PG · 08-08-2006, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC

20 of such small programs at $50k monthly is $1000k. And I'm sure there are a lot more.

Yea, but who knows how much is enough to be worthwhile for guys like Paycom? Think about it from their perspective. They would have to put half a dozen programmers to work, review features, run neverending workshops, 50+ sweet-looking powerpoint charts to convince management, endless testing, bug reports. Then marketing, customer + webmaster feedback. The whole shebang.

What do they get? Another 50 programs doing 50k monthly? Could well be such headache is not even worth an additional 2.5m in monthly revenues to them.

Just a train of thoughts, pure speculation.

Crazy Carlos · 08-08-2006, 07:35 AM

the only thing i wish for is a better backend at ccbill and if paycom offers that then we all know that ccbill will lose some clients. I think that the backend is very important and most billing companies out there except jettis, don't have a very good affiliate system. or i must have missed them.

andrej_NDC · 08-08-2006, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David - PG

Yea, but who knows how much is enough to be worthwhile for guys like Paycom? Think about it from their perspective. They would have to put half a dozen programmers to work, review features, run neverending workshops, 50+ sweet-looking powerpoint charts to convince management, endless testing, bug reports. Then marketing, customer + webmaster feedback. The whole shebang.

What do they get? Another 50 programs doing 50k monthly? Could well be such headache is not even worth an additional 2.5m in monthly revenues to them.

Just a train of thoughts, pure speculation.

Yeah, I know what you mean. And its also harder to find a motivation when things are running fine without much extra effort. But I was told paycom is working on improving their stats for some time now, so maybe they expect more small or middle sized clients.

andrej_NDC · 08-08-2006, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy Carlos

then we all know that ccbill will lose some clients.

Then it will depend only on $$$. Who will make me/us more. But I don't think there are big differences between those two.

Manowar · 08-08-2006, 09:12 AM

Hopefully CCBill's improvements will be great

08-07-2006, 02:33 PM	#1
justsexxx Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 13,723	So ccbill is coming with improvements, while paycom stand still? CCBILL has much better/detailed stats. Especially for affiliates... CCBILL made many improvements since last year...And now the Debit card addition etc...While paycom hasn't been improved since? well since when? Also paycom EU sucks for smaller paysite owners..Since paycom can not send checks to affiliates, when the program owner is using paycomeu... Agree or? __________________ Questions? ICQ: 125184542

08-07-2006, 03:47 PM	#2
chupachups Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sweden/Spain you sum bitch! Posts: 6,576	Bump for a good thread __________________

08-07-2006, 03:54 PM	#4
scottybuzz Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: NY Posts: 14,800	buimpppppp __________________ $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

08-07-2006, 03:56 PM	#5
BradShaw Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: KB's trailer Posts: 7,840	They are out racing. __________________ Sig too big http://www.gofuckyourself.com/gfy_faqs.html Want to use a large banner in your sig??? Contact Eric about getting on as an advertiser - eric AT adult.com

08-07-2006, 07:18 PM	#8
PR_Dave Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Italy Posts: 2,792	I got a sneak peek at all the new Paycom stuff. Going to kick major ass, epsecially after they announce who they teamed up with for stats. __________________ www.PIMPROLL.com

08-07-2006, 03:50 PM	#3
RRRED Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: WA Posts: 6,754	Oh Andre, stop being a trouble maker

08-07-2006, 04:01 PM	#6
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	I'd rather ccbill didn't make "improvements" to their affiliate stats, some of their more recent ones are quite bizarre.

08-07-2006, 07:18 PM	#9
KrisKross Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 5,025	I heard Paycom just struck a deal with MPA which involves a complete overhaul of their stats backend. __________________

08-08-2006, 04:43 AM	#13
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	isn't paycom/epoch merging their backend affiliate system with MPA? that alone would beat ccbill to the ground in a heartbeat....ccbill has the ultimate worst backend for affiliates in the world...if you ever want to know what NOT to do with a program backend, just log into the ccbill affiliate system hell, I send ccbill site owners traffic consistantly and only like half the hits even register in their backend

08-08-2006, 04:45 AM	#14
Pimpin_J Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: SplitInfinity.com Posts: 3,637	Smelling dead meat... __________________

08-08-2006, 06:21 AM	#22
gooddomains Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Netherlands Posts: 10,127	paycom go

08-08-2006, 07:35 AM	#25
Crazy Carlos Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Crazy Payout$ Posts: 699	the only thing i wish for is a better backend at ccbill and if paycom offers that then we all know that ccbill will lose some clients. I think that the backend is very important and most billing companies out there except jettis, don't have a very good affiliate system. or i must have missed them. __________________ YOU DON'T WANT TO MISS CRAZY PAYOUTS V1.5 LAUNCHING SOON WITH $4000 GIVEAWAY

08-08-2006, 09:12 AM	#28
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	Hopefully CCBill's improvements will be great