Serious question: why did "Legal in 6 days" thread got locked? - GoFuckYourself.com

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 01:56 PM

There was no nudity in there.

What about people posting pics of their kids? Why don't they get banned?

Chris · 07-20-2006, 01:56 PM

same reason the coke whore thread got deleted.

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

same reason the coke whore thread got deleted.

which reason is that?

BoyAlley · 07-20-2006, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

same reason the coke whore thread got deleted.

DutchTeenCash · 07-20-2006, 01:58 PM

ronaldo · 07-20-2006, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

What about people posting pics of their kids? Why don't they get banned?

The context is quite different.

Chris · 07-20-2006, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

which reason is that?

no clue really

but i can see why the 6 day legal thread was edited.... under chicks in bra's is all gfy needs ;-/

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

The context is quite different.

How do you determine the context?

Seriously, i'm not trying to be a smartass, just wondering why?

DutchTeenCash · 07-20-2006, 02:01 PM

dude youre kidding right?

this kid is puttin underaged pics there with a sexual context and youre wondering whats wrong with that?

nikki99 · 07-20-2006, 02:01 PM

so fucking banned

DutchTeenCash · 07-20-2006, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikki99

so fucking banned

yeah he can join that guy from last week and his lame ass sex questions thread

Trixxxia · 07-20-2006, 02:03 PM

Also, to my knowledge you can't even propose or make deals for this industry to the 'model' to someone who is not of legal age.

I could be wrong - but there's QUITE a distinction when posting a pic of your kid playing soccer.

ronaldo · 07-20-2006, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

How do you determine the context?

Seriously, i'm not trying to be a smartass, just wondering why?

imo, me posting a pic of my 7 year old son or daughter opening up Christmas gifts is quite a bit different than an underage (albeit only 6 days) girl showing cleavage telling us she's ready to get into the porn business.

Just suppose they let that go. Then someone posts someone a month underage. They let that go. Then someone posts 2 months underage.....

Where do they draw the line? The easiest place is at the age of 18.

Why the person would actually SAY she's underage is beyond me. Who'd have known the difference? (Not meant to give anyone any ideas. I'm just saying).

StuartD · 07-20-2006, 02:04 PM

I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.

If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.

Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?

But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.

Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx

dude youre kidding right?

this kid is puttin underaged pics there with a sexual context and youre wondering whats wrong with that?

I'm not kidding.

Ok, lets suppose there was a "sexual context" there (btw, what criteria do you use to determine it?), so is it illegal? Which law regulates it?

CaptainHowdy · 07-20-2006, 02:10 PM

Couldn't just wait 6 days??

jimthefiend · 07-20-2006, 02:12 PM

God you're fucking stupid.

jimthefiend · 07-20-2006, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

I'm not kidding.

Ok, lets suppose there was a "sexual context" there (btw, what criteria do you use to determine it?), so is it illegal? Which law regulates it?

Libertine · 07-20-2006, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx

this kid

You're fucking kidding me. In six days, you'd happily show her on your sites, opening up all her orifices for the world to see, but now you still consider her a "kid"?

Closing the thread may have been a wise move legally speaking, but apart from that, it has no meaning whatsoever.

ronaldo · 07-20-2006, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD

I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.

If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.

Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?

But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.

Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!

I don't think it's so much we're afraid of each other, as much as we're afraid of who's monitoring GFY.

If it was a cute 17 year old girl in a bikini, that's one thing. But an underage girl being blantantly provative and mentioning that she wants to get into the industry when she's legal is quite another. If anything it kind of reeks of entrapment.

Also, as Trixxxia points out, it is illegal to proposition someone under the legal age for adult modelling work.

I agree with the rest of your post though. It cracks me up to see the word pedo thrown around when the girl turns 18 tomorrow. That's not what a pedophile is.

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld

legally speaking

How do you determine if its legal or not? The girl was fully clothed.

Hell, half the board members promote websites who feature NUDE underage models - under the pretense of "art". (metart, herge, etc)

TexasDreams · 07-20-2006, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

but i can see why the 6 day legal thread was edited.... under chicks in bra's is all gfy needs ;-/

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx

this kid is puttin underaged pics there with a sexual context and youre wondering whats wrong with that?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TopBucksTrixxxia

Also, to my knowledge you can't even propose or make deals for this industry to the 'model' to someone who is not of legal age.

I could be wrong - but there's QUITE a distinction when posting a pic of your kid playing soccer.

All that and more. We don't need anymore FBI calls about GFY either.

DutchTeenCash · 07-20-2006, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

How do you determine if its legal or not? The girl was fully clothed.

Hell, half the board members promote websites who feature NUDE underage models - under the pretense of "art". (metart, herge, etc)

oh wow youre here to make friends

well newsflash : NOT half the board promotes underaged shit, even more so most ppl here HATE it.

Unless youre in some shithole country its 18+ whats legal. Nude nonnude it doesnt matter. 18. Period. Gotta love bending laws.

potter · 07-20-2006, 02:24 PM

This thread makes me loose faith in humanity.

OG LennyT · 07-20-2006, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD

I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.

If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.

Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?

But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.

Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!

sounds like you have issues and have justified the problem in your own mind

potter · 07-20-2006, 02:34 PM

And for the record, Hooligan. You must have no common sense at all. Or are simply looking for a pointless arguement.

Best analogy I can think of is, it's the same reason why you don't point a gun at someone. Sure, it might not be loaded, and you don't have your finger on the trigger. But it's just smarter (common sense) to simply point it at a inanimate object.

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx

oh wow youre here to make friends

well newsflash : NOT half the board promotes underaged shit, even more so most ppl here HATE it.

Unless youre in some shithole country its 18+ whats legal. Nude nonnude it doesnt matter. 18. Period. Gotta love bending laws.

Sears underwear catalogue much?

potter · 07-20-2006, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

Sears underwear catalogue much?

If you can't tell the difference from GFY and a sears catalogue. Please don't go doing something stupid like breeding.

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter

If you can't tell the difference from GFY and a sears catalogue. Please don't go doing something stupid like breeding.

No I cant tell the difference. People post their kids here all the time. So what?

Why shouldn't 18- girls be allowed to do modeling?

This has been done offline for ages. Fashion shows, magazines, newspapers. Do you blame them for pedo catering too?? What's so different about the web as a medium that makes it NOT OK to do same thing?

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE · 07-20-2006, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

Seriously, i'm not trying to be a smartass, just wondering why?

no, but you ARE a dumbass

Scott McD · 07-20-2006, 03:03 PM

Link to the thread ??

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOL :D

no, but you ARE a dumbass

who the fuck are you?

czarina · 07-20-2006, 03:04 PM

I think that people get out of hand with some of this, but at the same time, I can see the reason.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE · 07-20-2006, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

who the fuck are you?

someone whos not as stupid as you are idiot

Scott McD · 07-20-2006, 03:06 PM

So she was 17 huh.

Legal here...

TurboAngel · 07-20-2006, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexasDreams

All that and more. We don't need anymore FBI calls about GFY either.

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOL :D

someone whos not as stupid as you are idiot

Stupid enough not to know proper grammar.

DutchTeenCash · 07-20-2006, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

Sears underwear catalogue much?

you need a serious checkup - and Im glad others agree on that

Im outa here

StuartD · 07-20-2006, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dvd316

sounds like you have issues and have justified the problem in your own mind

People freak out at the sight of a girl in a bikini and I have issues? Ok there Sherlock

Hooligan · 07-20-2006, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx

you need a serious checkup - and Im glad others agree on that

Im outa here

You need to stop being a fucking cunt. I'm glad others agree on that.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE · 07-20-2006, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

Stupid enough not to know proper grammar.

hey, i admit i suck at grammar, but atleast i can spell "are" properly, and know how many miles 180 acres are ;)

OG LennyT · 07-20-2006, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

You need to stop being a fucking cunt. I'm glad others agree on that.

I love that word

cunt

even funnier calling someone a 'cunt'

Doctor Dre · 07-20-2006, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

How do you determine if its legal or not? The girl was fully clothed.

Hell, half the board members promote websites who feature NUDE underage models - under the pretense of "art". (metart, herge, etc)

I don't personally know anybody who do / did underage clothed girl sites.

Don't mix your friend/business network with every1 elses.

Screaming · 07-20-2006, 05:43 PM

guess she can repost it in 6 days lol

minusonebit · 07-20-2006, 05:45 PM

What a fucked up thread.

reynold · 07-20-2006, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan

I'm not kidding.
Which law regulates it?

GFY law, and nobody here is encouraged to question that.

07-20-2006, 01:56 PM	#1
Hooligan So Fucking Banned Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 1,472	Serious question: why did "Legal in 6 days" thread got locked? There was no nudity in there. What about people posting pics of their kids? Why don't they get banned?

07-20-2006, 01:56 PM	#2
Chris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: icq: 71462500 Skype: Jupzchris Posts: 27,880	same reason the coke whore thread got deleted. __________________ [email protected]

07-20-2006, 01:58 PM	#5
DutchTeenCash I like Dutch Girls Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: dutchteencash.com Posts: 21,684	__________________ ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash bob AT dutchteencash DOT com ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

07-20-2006, 02:01 PM	#9
DutchTeenCash I like Dutch Girls Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: dutchteencash.com Posts: 21,684	dude youre kidding right? this kid is puttin underaged pics there with a sexual context and youre wondering whats wrong with that? __________________ ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash bob AT dutchteencash DOT com ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

07-20-2006, 02:01 PM	#10
nikki99 Supermodel Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Sodoma & Gomorra Posts: 22,904	so fucking banned __________________ SMC Revenue - Best Tgirl websites of the world now VR Non exclusive BIG Tranny/shemale Package for sale, full 2257 - hit me up skype: nikkimontero

07-20-2006, 02:03 PM	#12
Trixxxia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 5,600	Also, to my knowledge you can't even propose or make deals for this industry to the 'model' to someone who is not of legal age. I could be wrong - but there's QUITE a distinction when posting a pic of your kid playing soccer.

07-20-2006, 02:04 PM	#14
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent. This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think. If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me. Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right? But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home. Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!

07-20-2006, 02:10 PM	#16
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,740	Couldn't just wait 6 days?? __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.

07-20-2006, 02:12 PM	#17
jimthefiend So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: icq: 121189 Posts: 18,889	God you're fucking stupid.

07-20-2006, 02:24 PM	#24
potter Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Denver Posts: 6,559	This thread makes me loose faith in humanity. __________________

07-20-2006, 02:34 PM	#26
potter Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Denver Posts: 6,559	And for the record, Hooligan. You must have no common sense at all. Or are simply looking for a pointless arguement. Best analogy I can think of is, it's the same reason why you don't point a gun at someone. Sure, it might not be loaded, and you don't have your finger on the trigger. But it's just smarter (common sense) to simply point it at a inanimate object. __________________

07-20-2006, 03:03 PM	#31
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	Link to the thread ?? __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

07-20-2006, 03:04 PM	#33
czarina Webmaster Extraordinaire Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: A beautiful beach... Posts: 10,748	I think that people get out of hand with some of this, but at the same time, I can see the reason.

07-20-2006, 03:06 PM	#35
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	So she was 17 huh. Legal here... __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

07-20-2006, 05:43 PM	#44
Screaming I can change this!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18,972	guess she can repost it in 6 days lol __________________

07-20-2006, 05:45 PM	#45
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	What a fucked up thread.