GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Serious question: why did "Legal in 6 days" thread got locked? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=635630)

Hooligan 07-20-2006 01:56 PM

Serious question: why did "Legal in 6 days" thread got locked?
 
There was no nudity in there.

What about people posting pics of their kids? Why don't they get banned?

Chris 07-20-2006 01:56 PM

same reason the coke whore thread got deleted.

Hooligan 07-20-2006 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris
same reason the coke whore thread got deleted.

which reason is that?

BoyAlley 07-20-2006 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris
same reason the coke whore thread got deleted.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

DutchTeenCash 07-20-2006 01:58 PM

http://www.dutchteencash.com/funnypics/dumbass.jpg

ronaldo 07-20-2006 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
What about people posting pics of their kids? Why don't they get banned?

The context is quite different.

Chris 07-20-2006 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
which reason is that?

no clue really

but i can see why the 6 day legal thread was edited.... under chicks in bra's is all gfy needs ;-/

Hooligan 07-20-2006 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo
The context is quite different.

How do you determine the context?

Seriously, i'm not trying to be a smartass, just wondering why?

DutchTeenCash 07-20-2006 02:01 PM

dude youre kidding right?

this kid is puttin underaged pics there with a sexual context and youre wondering whats wrong with that?

nikki99 07-20-2006 02:01 PM

so fucking banned :)

DutchTeenCash 07-20-2006 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikki99
so fucking banned :)

yeah he can join that guy from last week and his lame ass sex questions thread

Trixxxia 07-20-2006 02:03 PM

Also, to my knowledge you can't even propose or make deals for this industry to the 'model' to someone who is not of legal age.


I could be wrong - but there's QUITE a distinction when posting a pic of your kid playing soccer.

ronaldo 07-20-2006 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
How do you determine the context?

Seriously, i'm not trying to be a smartass, just wondering why?

imo, me posting a pic of my 7 year old son or daughter opening up Christmas gifts is quite a bit different than an underage (albeit only 6 days) girl showing cleavage telling us she's ready to get into the porn business.

Just suppose they let that go. Then someone posts someone a month underage. They let that go. Then someone posts 2 months underage.....

Where do they draw the line? The easiest place is at the age of 18.

Why the person would actually SAY she's underage is beyond me. Who'd have known the difference? (Not meant to give anyone any ideas. I'm just saying).

StuartD 07-20-2006 02:04 PM

I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.

If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.

Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?

But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.

Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!

Hooligan 07-20-2006 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
dude youre kidding right?

this kid is puttin underaged pics there with a sexual context and youre wondering whats wrong with that?

I'm not kidding.

Ok, lets suppose there was a "sexual context" there (btw, what criteria do you use to determine it?), so is it illegal? Which law regulates it?

CaptainHowdy 07-20-2006 02:10 PM

Couldn't just wait 6 days??

jimthefiend 07-20-2006 02:12 PM

God you're fucking stupid.

jimthefiend 07-20-2006 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
I'm not kidding.

Ok, lets suppose there was a "sexual context" there (btw, what criteria do you use to determine it?), so is it illegal? Which law regulates it?



:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Libertine 07-20-2006 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
this kid

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You're fucking kidding me. In six days, you'd happily show her on your sites, opening up all her orifices for the world to see, but now you still consider her a "kid"?

Closing the thread may have been a wise move legally speaking, but apart from that, it has no meaning whatsoever.

ronaldo 07-20-2006 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.

If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.

Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?

But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.

Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!

I don't think it's so much we're afraid of each other, as much as we're afraid of who's monitoring GFY.

If it was a cute 17 year old girl in a bikini, that's one thing. But an underage girl being blantantly provative and mentioning that she wants to get into the industry when she's legal is quite another. If anything it kind of reeks of entrapment.

Also, as Trixxxia points out, it is illegal to proposition someone under the legal age for adult modelling work.

I agree with the rest of your post though. It cracks me up to see the word pedo thrown around when the girl turns 18 tomorrow. That's not what a pedophile is.

Hooligan 07-20-2006 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
legally speaking

How do you determine if its legal or not? The girl was fully clothed.

Hell, half the board members promote websites who feature NUDE underage models - under the pretense of "art". (metart, herge, etc)

TexasDreams 07-20-2006 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris
but i can see why the 6 day legal thread was edited.... under chicks in bra's is all gfy needs ;-/

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
this kid is puttin underaged pics there with a sexual context and youre wondering whats wrong with that?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TopBucksTrixxxia
Also, to my knowledge you can't even propose or make deals for this industry to the 'model' to someone who is not of legal age.

I could be wrong - but there's QUITE a distinction when posting a pic of your kid playing soccer.

All that and more. We don't need anymore FBI calls about GFY either. :Oh crap

DutchTeenCash 07-20-2006 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
How do you determine if its legal or not? The girl was fully clothed.

Hell, half the board members promote websites who feature NUDE underage models - under the pretense of "art". (metart, herge, etc)

oh wow youre here to make friends

well newsflash : NOT half the board promotes underaged shit, even more so most ppl here HATE it.

Unless youre in some shithole country its 18+ whats legal. Nude nonnude it doesnt matter. 18. Period. Gotta love bending laws.

potter 07-20-2006 02:24 PM

This thread makes me loose faith in humanity.

OG LennyT 07-20-2006 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
I hate to agree with you, but sadly... that thread was rather innocent.
This board... this industry, is made up of paranoid people who fear each other so much as to tip toe over everything they do for fear of what dirty perverted pornographers might think.

If you see a 16 or 17 year old in a bikini and you think that's wrong... you're the one thinking the bad thoughts. Not me.

Personally, I've met a lot of great people from GFY and have yet to meet one really freaky pedo pervert.. that I know of. I'd like to think that we here would be way more open to sexuality, beauty and the human body than most other places... we are supposed to be more open minded, right?

But no, we all think everyone else here is going to rape the girl in the picture if we post the picture on the dreaded GFY message board. That every time a person hits "submit".. they're the only person on GFY who wouldn't do something horrible to that girl, because after all... once they see the picture, they'll naturally have all kinds of access to that girl's home.

Heaven forbid the rest of us perverts ever see anything other than a completely nude skanky slut whore who does double anal, because an innocently clothed person who's under 18 would truly corrupt us and we certainly can't have that!

sounds like you have issues and have justified the problem in your own mind :helpme :helpme :helpme

potter 07-20-2006 02:34 PM

And for the record, Hooligan. You must have no common sense at all. Or are simply looking for a pointless arguement.

Best analogy I can think of is, it's the same reason why you don't point a gun at someone. Sure, it might not be loaded, and you don't have your finger on the trigger. But it's just smarter (common sense) to simply point it at a inanimate object.

Hooligan 07-20-2006 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
oh wow youre here to make friends

well newsflash : NOT half the board promotes underaged shit, even more so most ppl here HATE it.

Unless youre in some shithole country its 18+ whats legal. Nude nonnude it doesnt matter. 18. Period. Gotta love bending laws.


Sears underwear catalogue much?

potter 07-20-2006 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
Sears underwear catalogue much?

If you can't tell the difference from GFY and a sears catalogue. Please don't go doing something stupid like breeding.

Hooligan 07-20-2006 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter
If you can't tell the difference from GFY and a sears catalogue. Please don't go doing something stupid like breeding.

No I cant tell the difference. People post their kids here all the time. So what?


Why shouldn't 18- girls be allowed to do modeling?

This has been done offline for ages. Fashion shows, magazines, newspapers. Do you blame them for pedo catering too?? What's so different about the web as a medium that makes it NOT OK to do same thing?

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 07-20-2006 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
Seriously, i'm not trying to be a smartass, just wondering why?

no, but you ARE a dumbass :2 cents:

Scott McD 07-20-2006 03:03 PM

Link to the thread ??

Hooligan 07-20-2006 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOL :D
no, but you ARE a dumbass :2 cents:

who the fuck are you?


:1orglaugh

czarina 07-20-2006 03:04 PM

I think that people get out of hand with some of this, but at the same time, I can see the reason.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 07-20-2006 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
who the fuck are you?


:1orglaugh

someone whos not as stupid as you are idiot

Scott McD 07-20-2006 03:06 PM

So she was 17 huh.

Legal here... :)

TurboAngel 07-20-2006 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexasDreams
All that and more. We don't need anymore FBI calls about GFY either. :Oh crap


:thumbsup

Hooligan 07-20-2006 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOL :D
someone whos not as stupid as you are idiot

Stupid enough not to know proper grammar.

:1orglaugh

DutchTeenCash 07-20-2006 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
Sears underwear catalogue much?

you need a serious checkup - and Im glad others agree on that

Im outa here

StuartD 07-20-2006 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dvd316
sounds like you have issues and have justified the problem in your own mind :helpme :helpme :helpme

People freak out at the sight of a girl in a bikini and I have issues? Ok there Sherlock :1orglaugh

Hooligan 07-20-2006 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
you need a serious checkup - and Im glad others agree on that

Im outa here

You need to stop being a fucking cunt. I'm glad others agree on that.

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 07-20-2006 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
Stupid enough not to know proper grammar.

:1orglaugh

hey, i admit i suck at grammar, but atleast i can spell "are" properly, and know how many miles 180 acres are ;)

OG LennyT 07-20-2006 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
You need to stop being a fucking cunt. I'm glad others agree on that.


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I love that word

cunt

even funnier calling someone a 'cunt'

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Doctor Dre 07-20-2006 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
How do you determine if its legal or not? The girl was fully clothed.

Hell, half the board members promote websites who feature NUDE underage models - under the pretense of "art". (metart, herge, etc)

I don't personally know anybody who do / did underage clothed girl sites.

Don't mix your friend/business network with every1 elses.

Screaming 07-20-2006 05:43 PM

guess she can repost it in 6 days lol

minusonebit 07-20-2006 05:45 PM

What a fucked up thread.

reynold 07-20-2006 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooligan
I'm not kidding.
Which law regulates it?


GFY law, and nobody here is encouraged to question that. :pimp


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123