GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   GFY Design Contest Voting URL (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=63472)

alias 06-07-2002 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gary


Snow didnt design it dumbass

no he did not, but the branding snow speaks of is a double edged sword. Meaning: people have seen mafia bucks and their sites "announced" plenty of times recently.

This can cause high ratings because they are voting not only for a site but for the branded entity that is so clearly apparent.

To have a recognizable name or logo is just as bad as if nina had used her own pics, which was the reasoning for rule #5 in the first place.

As I posted before: rules ARE rules.

Gary 06-07-2002 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Houdini


No shit sherlock, I never said he did. It's the brand genius.

But the rule you quoted was for DESIGNERS! Genius.

Gary 06-07-2002 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by alias


no he did not, but the branding snow speaks of is a double edged sword. Meaning: people have seen mafia bucks and their sites "announced" plenty of times recently.

This can cause high ratings because they are voting not only for a site but for the branded entity that is so clearly apparent.

To have a recognizable name or logo is just as bad as if nina had used her own pics, which was the reasoning for rule #5 in the first place.

As I posted before: rules ARE rules.

And people could also give it a low mark because they hate snow. ( no offence snow. :) )

Scorpion 06-07-2002 06:26 PM

It says not to make it "DESIGNER" identifiable. And it's not. Nothing about it being a client job or part of a program or any of that nonsense that you people are creating in your own minds. Don't interpret. Read.

Kimmykim 06-07-2002 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Houdini


7. Tours may not be blatantly designer identifiable until AFTER the competition. What this means is, the voting is going to be anonymous. You can't put your name on the thing or something so that people will instantly recognize who did it. If your particular style is picked up on, that's acceptable (and really unavoidable anyway), but don't "mark" your tour by putting your company url on it or something.

#1 may be disqualified.

OK how many people here know who actually did the tour for Snow?

Gary 06-07-2002 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim


OK how many people here know who actually did the tour for Snow?

I thought you did Kim???

Houdini 06-07-2002 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gary


But the rule you quoted was for DESIGNERS! Genius.

My point exactly. I was never going after Snow, the OWNER, but whoever did it obviously has pull with the brand name that could cause some unfair votes. Doesn't matter anyway, it's a kick ass design, if it wins it wins. Tours look good.

Time to watch the Lakers kick some ass.

SR 06-07-2002 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim


OK how many people here know who actually did the tour for Snow?

I did but that's because snow showed me the site last week

Kimmykim 06-07-2002 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gary


I thought you did Kim???

Well yes, I'm a graphic goddess, you ought to know from peeking over my shoulder all the time.

That's not the point however, though I suppose people will give it a 1 now since they don't like me. :(

Naughty 06-07-2002 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SR


I did but that's because snow showed me the site last week

Somebody said it was designed this week

LoveAsianChicks 06-07-2002 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim

That's not the point however, though I suppose people will give it a 1 now since they don't like me. :(

I like you :winkwink:
Actually the vote is about over so don't worry.

Kat - Fast 06-07-2002 06:53 PM

okies - what I've seen so far looks pretty - but some of my whole fuckin SITES load quicker.

Ya - I'm testing your 'skills' on dial up - the same as most of the surfers will see it - "80% of surfers will wait 8 seconds before trying another link" 30+ seconds - dream on

[Labret] 06-07-2002 07:00 PM

grannies gone wild made me weep

mastamindz 06-07-2002 07:01 PM

When is the voting finished?

SNOW 06-07-2002 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gary


And people could also give it a low mark because they hate snow. ( no offence snow. :) )

Good Point I never thought of this. So being the fact most like me I have nothing to worrry about.

SNOW 06-07-2002 07:05 PM

DO NOT TEST LOAD TIME.. PEOPLE are hitting this like a bat out of hell and I don't think it's on a fast server..

Va2k 06-07-2002 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SNOW
DO NOT TEST LOAD TIME.. PEOPLE are hitting this like a bat out of hell and I don't think it's on a fast server..
AMEN on that brother :)~ Mine isnt doing too bad better then I thought it would of lmao BTW Nice design IM in heaven looking them over. DIdnt know there was alot of talent here. Good luck and I think the voting will be done fair even If I lose :) :2 cents:

Ms Amp 06-07-2002 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SNOW
DO NOT TEST LOAD TIME.. PEOPLE are hitting this like a bat out of hell and I don't think it's on a fast server..
very true Snow. Load time should not be a factor as none of these tours are on the servers they would normally be on, plus this is purely for the contest and it's being hammered. :)

NzDesignz 06-07-2002 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Naughty
Damn, our score is so low I think even TGF is kicking my ass, lol.
I wonder if ppl watch the whole tour, or just th esplash page. Maybe I should have rotated the tour/splash page and make the first page more eyecatching:mad:

I think alot of people just looked up the tour and then went to the next one, because they couldnt be fucked going through it all and because of some erorrs etc.

At least next year we know what would best attract people :Graucho

SNOW 06-07-2002 07:15 PM

Please look at the tours and look at how the pics are clickable.. its pretty cool. Alot of the sites have little new feautures. Dont just look at the splash, look at the whole site.

Kat - Fast 06-07-2002 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SNOW
DO NOT TEST LOAD TIME.. PEOPLE are hitting this like a bat out of hell and I don't think it's on a fast server..
most of my free hosted sites load quicker than these entrance pages...

ya - vote on speed too -80% of surfers will wait 10 seconds max before they exit

Ms Amp 06-07-2002 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kat


most of my free hosted sites load quicker than these entrance pages...

ya - vote on speed too -80% of surfers will wait 10 seconds max before they exit

okay, well, the speed of the host in not in question here is it?

Cyndalie 06-07-2002 07:42 PM

What matters is the rules. Who uploaded when and what graphics have been used (or resused as we've seen) in contest. Original. Effective. FUNCTIONAL.

Zexy.com was designed within the time frame alloted, by the designer qualified to design the site (NOT hired).

Zexy.com has intracate layers and interactive animations based on where the user is lead through the design. A judging basic.

Zexy.com is compressed, fast loading, and within page sizes (including graphics) allowed within the contest rules. I checked.

Zexy.com is sexy. It's art, has a theme. It makes me want to see more and is an effective design, created to convert.

Regardless of what I think, there a few other sites in that mix I can appreciate. But from a designers point of view, art and content blend to create an erotic (non obtrusive or confusing) picture. Straight up sexy.

*Edited for latenite typo's - Cynd

Fletch XXX 06-07-2002 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Houdini

this is a graphic design contest. For once this was about art and not about money.

True dat

The Machine 06-07-2002 08:50 PM

when does the voting end?

Hypo 06-07-2002 09:14 PM

Hey, I dont think my site is being viewed enough - I can't believe it's got so few points. Are people progressing BEYOND THE SPLASH PAGE??? I dont like this voting at all..

Fletch XXX 06-07-2002 09:16 PM

Yeah when does the voting stop?



:winkwink:

SleazyDream 06-07-2002 09:17 PM

i saw very little that impressed me..... not being rude but judging on the basis of looking for something different that stands out. They all looked like cookie cutter sites of each other.


I'm more into sites that do things DIFFERENTLY, and I saw little of that there.

SleazyDream 06-07-2002 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Houdini


Hence the name, this is a graphic design contest. For once this was about art and not about money.

there is no art without money

The Machine 06-07-2002 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


there is no art without money

haha, like there's no meal without a burger, right ;)

let's not be so extreme. people need to have fun too.

Cheers,
The Machine

SleazyDream 06-07-2002 09:34 PM

it's not extreme, just a fact of life. Poor people don't own origional Picasso's and Rembrants.

Fletch XXX 06-07-2002 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
it's not extreme, just a fact of life. Poor people don't own origional Picasso's and Rembrants.
Nope but poor people painted them.

Its what people exploit of the artist that justifies the price after the work is done and the artist is dead, its about supply and demand.

The Machine 06-07-2002 09:42 PM

well why do you need to own them? it's mostly for showing off, not for the love of art. and this again is a rather extreme example.

as i said, people need to have fun and in this and many other cases, money is not that important.

SleazyDream 06-07-2002 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Machine
well why do you need to own them? it's mostly for showing off, not for the love of art. and this again is a rather extreme example.

as i said, people need to have fun and in this and many other cases, money is not that important.


point made and taken. A LOT of work did go into those sites - I suppose I just expected something a little more........


which is a good note for the reputation of many of the designers. Working with a good ORIGIONAL idea most of them would kick ass.

FATPad 06-07-2002 09:46 PM

Oh gawd.

This was supposed to be a fun showoff contest for designers. It's not supposed to be about money at all.

Some of you really need to learn how to play and have fun with something.

Amazing how such a good idea for a fun little contest gets turned into this mess.

SNOW 06-07-2002 09:49 PM

It's all good no mess. Just alot of opinions. That's a good thing. And it is fun.

Houdini 06-07-2002 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream


there is no art without money

So it's only art if someone buys it? Uh ok.

SleazyDream 06-07-2002 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Houdini


So it's only art if someone buys it? Uh ok.

yup.

just like you're only a whore if you get paid. If you do it for free you're just a slut.

Rich people are essentric - poor people are crazy.

If someone buys it then it's art. If no one buys it's just a painting.


Life is cruel, deal with it.

Anton Graphics 06-07-2002 09:59 PM

Crazy competition!...

and I know, I have most worse design!

xxxtera 06-07-2002 10:07 PM

I just got BANNED!!! WTF..hehe i donīt know what happened... it stopped at a ugly design and then it told me I already had voted..hmm I pushed the back button and tried again 2 times..then my ass was toasted..LOL


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123