Is toe sucking considered sexual content? - GoFuckYourself.com

clickhappy · 05-12-2006, 08:36 AM

if you had 2 fully clothed women licking each others feet and nothing else, would you need a 2257 for it?

drctfiesta · 05-12-2006, 08:40 AM

ask him toe licker

ButtUgly-Bertha · 05-12-2006, 08:42 AM

No, but if you worried then do it.

clickhappy · 05-12-2006, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drctfiesta

ask him toe licker

lol look at that picture. it must have driven that foot fetish guy bonkers

clickhappy · 05-12-2006, 08:18 PM

bump
I still have this question

Spunky · 05-12-2006, 08:36 PM

They are still models..so yes

madawgz · 05-12-2006, 08:44 PM

hmmmmmm, yeah i think it would sell

Elli · 05-12-2006, 08:46 PM

I dunno, does the prurient interest factor come in at that point?

clickhappy · 05-12-2006, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spunky

They are still models..so yes

yeha you need a model release, but do you need a 2257 records keeping statement for it?

Webby · 05-12-2006, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy

if you had 2 fully clothed women licking each others feet and nothing else, would you need a 2257 for it?

Licking feet clickhappy??

Any explicit sexual act like that should leave you in no doubt you need 10 age verifications, foot swabs (after subjects feet have been licked), 18 legal opinions four verifications of the DNA of the photographer and, of course 2257 docs.

Wot a crazy world!

minusonebit · 05-12-2006, 09:25 PM

No, I would say not.

Gaybucks · 05-13-2006, 02:30 AM

We run a foot fetish site, and have discussed this issue with our attorney (Chad Belville) who is an adult industry specialist. However, IANAL and what's below is my interpretation of what we've been told (and what we've read for ourselves in 2257.)

The long and short of it is there is nothing in 2257 that would require 2257 docs for pictures of toe licking. It does not fall under the definition of "actual sexually explicit conduct" required by 2257.

However, as has been pointed out, you need a model release anyway to protect yourself against getting sued by the model for using the content without permission... and if you're going to go that far, you might as well get a government-issued photo ID.

Our approach is that even though we are not required to maintain 2257 records for our foot fetish site, we nonetheless do so. Basically, it never hurts to overcomply.

baddog · 05-13-2006, 02:37 AM

Just because it isn't "sexually explicit" doesn't mean it isn't sexual.

Why else would you do it?

05-12-2006, 08:36 AM	#1
clickhappy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 4,027	Is toe sucking considered sexual content? if you had 2 fully clothed women licking each others feet and nothing else, would you need a 2257 for it?

05-12-2006, 08:40 AM	#2
drctfiesta Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Kingdom of Darkness Posts: 1,821	ask him toe licker __________________ *

05-12-2006, 08:36 PM	#6
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,943	They are still models..so yes __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

05-12-2006, 08:44 PM	#7
madawgz 8.8.8.8 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Noordermarkt Posts: 30,509	hmmmmmm, yeah i think it would sell __________________ TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.

05-12-2006, 08:46 PM	#8
Elli Reach for those stars! Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 17,991	I dunno, does the prurient interest factor come in at that point? __________________ email: [email protected]

05-12-2006, 08:42 AM	#3
ButtUgly-Bertha What are these words under my name? Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 253	No, but if you worried then do it.

05-12-2006, 08:18 PM	#5
clickhappy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 4,027	bump I still have this question

05-12-2006, 09:25 PM	#11
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	No, I would say not.

05-13-2006, 02:30 AM	#12
Gaybucks Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sacramento, CA Posts: 451	We run a foot fetish site, and have discussed this issue with our attorney (Chad Belville) who is an adult industry specialist. However, IANAL and what's below is my interpretation of what we've been told (and what we've read for ourselves in 2257.) The long and short of it is there is nothing in 2257 that would require 2257 docs for pictures of toe licking. It does not fall under the definition of "actual sexually explicit conduct" required by 2257. However, as has been pointed out, you need a model release anyway to protect yourself against getting sued by the model for using the content without permission... and if you're going to go that far, you might as well get a government-issued photo ID. Our approach is that even though we are not required to maintain 2257 records for our foot fetish site, we nonetheless do so. Basically, it never hurts to overcomply. __________________ Gaybucks.com 100% exclusive American guys - hosted movie galleries - NATS - Boyfunk.com - Boysfeetclub.com - AJsCloset.com- SkylerDeVoss.com ICQ 272-995-402

05-13-2006, 02:37 AM	#13
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	Just because it isn't "sexually explicit" doesn't mean it isn't sexual. Why else would you do it?