if you had 2 fully clothed women licking each others feet and nothing else, would you need a 2257 for it?
-
-
ask him toe licker* -
-
lol look at that picture. it must have driven that foot fetish guy bonkersOriginally posted by drctfiestaComment
-
bump
I still have this questionComment
-
-
hmmmmmm, yeah i think it would sell
TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.Comment
-
-
yeha you need a model release, but do you need a 2257 records keeping statement for it?Originally posted by SpunkyComment
-
Licking feet clickhappy??Originally posted by clickhappy
Any explicit sexual act like that should leave you in no doubt you need 10 age verifications, foot swabs (after subjects feet have been licked), 18 legal opinions four verifications of the DNA of the photographer and, of course 2257 docs.
Wot a crazy world!
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
No, I would say not.Comment
-
We run a foot fetish site, and have discussed this issue with our attorney (Chad Belville) who is an adult industry specialist. However, IANAL and what's below is my interpretation of what we've been told (and what we've read for ourselves in 2257.)
The long and short of it is there is nothing in 2257 that would require 2257 docs for pictures of toe licking. It does not fall under the definition of "actual sexually explicit conduct" required by 2257.
However, as has been pointed out, you need a model release anyway to protect yourself against getting sued by the model for using the content without permission... and if you're going to go that far, you might as well get a government-issued photo ID.
Our approach is that even though we are not required to maintain 2257 records for our foot fetish site, we nonetheless do so. Basically, it never hurts to overcomply.Gaybucks.com 100% exclusive American guys - hosted movie galleries - NATS -
Boyfunk.com - Boysfeetclub.com - AJsCloset.com- SkylerDeVoss.com
ICQ 272-995-402
Comment
-
Just because it isn't "sexually explicit" doesn't mean it isn't sexual.
Why else would you do it?Comment
Comment