Is toe sucking considered sexual content?
 

if you had 2 fully clothed women licking each others feet and nothing else, would you need a 2257 for it?

ask him toe licker

No, but if you worried then do it.

lol look at that picture. it must have driven that foot fetish guy bonkers

bump
I still have this question

They are still models..so yes

hmmmmmm, yeah i think it would sell :)

I dunno, does the prurient interest factor come in at that point?

yeha you need a model release, but do you need a 2257 records keeping statement for it?

Licking feet clickhappy?? :winkwink:

Any explicit sexual act like that should leave you in no doubt you need 10 age verifications, foot swabs (after subjects feet have been licked), 18 legal opinions four verifications of the DNA of the photographer and, of course 2257 docs.

Wot a crazy world! :pimp

No, I would say not.

We run a foot fetish site, and have discussed this issue with our attorney (Chad Belville) who is an adult industry specialist. However, IANAL and what's below is my interpretation of what we've been told (and what we've read for ourselves in 2257.)

The long and short of it is there is nothing in 2257 that would require 2257 docs for pictures of toe licking. It does not fall under the definition of "actual sexually explicit conduct" required by 2257.

However, as has been pointed out, you need a model release anyway to protect yourself against getting sued by the model for using the content without permission... and if you're going to go that far, you might as well get a government-issued photo ID.

Our approach is that even though we are not required to maintain 2257 records for our foot fetish site, we nonetheless do so. Basically, it never hurts to overcomply.

Just because it isn't "sexually explicit" doesn't mean it isn't sexual.

Why else would you do it?