DNA proves Duke boys innocent - GoFuckYourself.com

Alex · 04-10-2006, 07:47 PM

http://sports.yahoo.com/top/news;_yl...v=ap&type=lgns

Look what these wild accusations have caused:
"e resignation of coach Mike Pressler, the cancellation of the lacrosse season and the suspension of one player from school."

Hotrocket · 04-10-2006, 08:14 PM

Not taking sides either way...
but your topic title is misleading.
all it proves it there was no DNA evidence, doesnt prove they are innocent.

Hollywood376 · 04-10-2006, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrocket

Not taking sides either way...
but your topic title is misleading.
all it proves it there was no DNA evidence, doesnt prove they are innocent.

if it doesn't fit, you must aquit. Didn't Johnny Cochran teach us anything!

SmokeyTheBear · 04-10-2006, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrocket

Not taking sides either way...
but your topic title is misleading.
all it proves it there was no DNA evidence, doesnt prove they are innocent.

They didnt find enough dna to make amatch so it wasnt the "dna" that proved anything it was the "lack" of dna that might prove something..

As the prosecuter said , they have other evidence , and if the guys used condoms ( makes sense ) they might not leave dna

Alex · 04-10-2006, 08:58 PM

A bunch of college kids acting on impulse:
Choked and dragged and then raped her.

And no DNA was left.....

Makes you wonder.

Downtime · 04-10-2006, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrocket

Not taking sides either way...
but your topic title is misleading.
all it proves it there was no DNA evidence, doesnt prove they are innocent.

what he said

SmokeyTheBear · 04-10-2006, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

A bunch of college kids acting on impulse:
Choked and dragged and then raped her.

And no DNA was left.....

Makes you wonder.

could be she made it up knowing they were all rich kids and their parents wouldnt go through charges and would settle. but frankly , strippers just arent that smart either so its a toss up..

Kevin - The PNN · 04-10-2006, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrocket

Not taking sides either way...
but your topic title is misleading.
all it proves it there was no DNA evidence, doesnt prove they are innocent.

You are right. Moreover, one is NEVER proven innocent, you are either guilty or not guilty - a person is NEVER found innocent. I know most people think different - look it up.

Tom_PM · 04-10-2006, 09:19 PM

The woman said she was raped and penetrated and the guy ejaculated. No hair, no sperm, no sweat, no nothing found.

She also said she broke 4 fingernails scratching and fighting them off. Fingernails were found with no dna or anything on them. None of the players had scratches either.

Man if they did it, it's gonna be INCREDIBLY hard to prove from what it looks like!

tony286 · 04-10-2006, 09:39 PM

I think Duke was stupid for acting so fast, I thought its innocent until proven guilty.

OneHungLo · 04-10-2006, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

A bunch of college kids acting on impulse:
Choked and dragged and then raped her.

And no DNA was left.....

Makes you wonder.

hmmm

Thats what i thought when i read that. Seems like the D.A has a hard on for those boys. Wonder what other evidence they have?

GatorB · 04-10-2006, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

They didnt find enough dna to make amatch so it wasnt the "dna" that proved anything it was the "lack" of dna that might prove something..

As the prosecuter said , they have other evidence , and if the guys used condoms ( makes sense ) they might not leave dna

They would leave PUBES. Also supposedly she was raped in the bathroom. Hell you could easily get DNA on you by ACCIDENT in the bathroom. What, did they clean and sterilize the bathroom before the stripper came over?

Sosa · 04-10-2006, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

They would leave PUBES. Also supposedly she was raped in the bathroom. Hell you could easily get DNA on you by ACCIDENT in the bathroom. What, did they clean and sterilize the bathroom before the stripper came over?

Only smart people are allowed into Duke

Alex · 04-10-2006, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sosa

Only smart people are allowed into Duke

True.

But these are ATHLETES.

Im pretty sure they didnt get in thanks to thier high G.P.A's

04-10-2006, 07:47 PM	#1
Alex So Fucking Banned (YEA!!) Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 10,963	DNA proves Duke boys innocent http://sports.yahoo.com/top/news;_yl...v=ap&type=lgns Look what these wild accusations have caused: "e resignation of coach Mike Pressler, the cancellation of the lacrosse season and the suspension of one player from school." __________________ Care about me? Who? Me! Who?

04-10-2006, 08:58 PM	#5
Alex So Fucking Banned (YEA!!) Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 10,963	A bunch of college kids acting on impulse: Choked and dragged and then raped her. And no DNA was left..... Makes you wonder. __________________ Care about me? Who? Me! Who?

04-10-2006, 09:19 PM	#9
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	The woman said she was raped and penetrated and the guy ejaculated. No hair, no sperm, no sweat, no nothing found. She also said she broke 4 fingernails scratching and fighting them off. Fingernails were found with no dna or anything on them. None of the players had scratches either. Man if they did it, it's gonna be INCREDIBLY hard to prove from what it looks like! __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

04-10-2006, 08:14 PM	#2
Hotrocket Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,327	Not taking sides either way... but your topic title is misleading. all it proves it there was no DNA evidence, doesnt prove they are innocent.

04-10-2006, 09:39 PM	#10
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	I think Duke was stupid for acting so fast, I thought its innocent until proven guilty.