Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hotrocket
Not taking sides either way...
but your topic title is misleading.
all it proves it there was no DNA evidence, doesnt prove they are innocent.
|
They didnt find enough dna to make amatch so it wasnt the "dna" that proved anything it was the "lack" of dna that might prove something..
As the prosecuter said , they have other evidence , and if the guys used condoms ( makes sense ) they might not leave dna