|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#51 |
|
<&(©¿©)&>
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 47,882
|
Cincuenta!...........
__________________
Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager ![]() Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
Farm subsidies have gotten out of hand for sure. They were started during the great depression to keep families from losing their farms. These days the "family farm" has all but disappeared, you have giant agribusinesses running all the farms in this country and the subsidies amount to us cutting 8 figure checks to one company for growing this or that. I actually agreed with Bush on this topic because he wanted to limit the amount of the subsidy being paid to any one business, so that the subsidy money would actually go to family farmers instead of the giant agribusinesses, but the republicans in congress wouldn't play ball. On the other hand, food is cheaper and more plentiful now than at any time in the history of the world. I haven't done enough research to know whether this is a result of gov't subsidies or because we're importing alot of food from South and Central America now. It could be a combination of both. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Trailer Park
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
Also, I read somewhere near the top of this thread that the Japanese didnt have illegal immigrants and they were doiing very well without them. Once again, check out what are the products that Japan make... they almost only make technology products. They pay their employees over minimal wage, but since their products costs a lot of money all around the globe, it doesnt matter, they will sell their products even if the prices are high. On the other hand, if the US wants to sell their vegetables to the americans, they need to have similar prices as the third world countries, which will not happen these companies stops to hire illegal immigrants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
</sarcasm> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Trailer Park
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
In other words, you are saying that even if illegal immigrants are good for your country, you would kick them out and make a lot of companies go bankrupt? Never forget that slaves are the people that made your country that rich, even if slavery was wrong. Hiring illegal immigrants are good for the USA, even if its illegal to hire them. Would you decrease your lifestyle and kick the illegal immigrants out of your country? I bet a lot of people would say no to that question... and that is exactly why they are here to stay. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 2,074
|
Well, if the illegal immigrants would leave US then you would have to hire local people to do the work. This will mean that you will need to pay higher salaries to them which means that the companies that own those people will raise the prices.
Consequently a lot of services and products will be more expensive. If the services will be more expensive this means that you will either won;t use it (which means that your life will be worse) or you will pay higher prices (so you will need to cut from some other part of your expenses so your life will be worse). IN any case your life won't be better. This is true for the services/products that need to be done locally. FOr all the other they will be outsourced and the companies will either close the gates or build a facotry somewhere else. In the end all goes to the competitiveness of the economy. Because US won WW2 and got out of it without major destruction, for the next 50 years after they had the econimic edge. However after USSR disintegrated the former 'conquered' countries got free and started to compete US. And now because of the constant war that costs money and consumes human resources (young people that could work in a factory instead) you loose even more. The cheap mexicans is just a simptom of an economy that is not healty! The solution must be thought elsewhere, not to just throw them all back! Egomancer
__________________
ICQ: 95-239-282 WWW: www.webprogrammers.eu WWW:www.seodev.eu Y!MSN: lord_ender If you want to outsource any work to Romania - here I am !!!! www.anotheranime.com | www.autotrafic.ro | www.jocurionline.ro |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,762
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
The Demon & 12clicks
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
|
Quote:
People making MORE money means they have more money to spend. This extra spending offsets higher costs to businesses. Also if you run a business and you are too inept to run a business where you can pay decent wages charges decent prices and make a profit them maybe you don't need to be in business in the first place. There is no constitutional right to run a business regardless of your competency. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Trailer Park
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
In other words, these companies will hire the same people, but will pay taxes to the Mexican government. These companies will then flood the US market with their products. The same companies will hire the same people at the same wage they were before. The only difference is that these comapnies will no longer pay taxes to the US gov. Seems like a good idea pal... NOT! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,762
|
Quote:
The problem for most farmers small businesses etc will not be an increased production cost to move away from manual labor; that will most likely decrease - and considerably in most instances - over any significant period of time. Eventually this will in turn provide a greater benefit to consumers as the cost savings are passed on. The problems business will most likely face will be ones of capital investments. IE it's probably easier for a farmer to pay a few mexican families in cash on a week by week basis to tend the fields than it would be for them to come up with enough money to pay for a new piece of farm equipment all at once. However if they have to spend 5 years worth of immigrant wages in order to purchase a machine that will greatly reduce labor costs for the next 20 years, this starts to make more economic sense in the long term. Middle class Americans may not like the idea of picking fruit for minimum wage, however they probably wouldn't have as much of a problem with operating a harvesting machine for more reasonable pay. So instead of employing for instance several dozen illegals at minimum wage or less the farmer ends up paying one american machine operator a decent living wage. The proliferation of cheap and illegal (but tolerated) labor in this country is just one more symptom of a much larger problem of selling off long term stability and growth in exchange for short term gain.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Trailer Park
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | ||
|
The Demon & 12clicks
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
|
Quote:
By the way I highly doubt my local Wal-Mart and McDonald's are moving to Mexico. Quote:
As far as farming. The VAST majority of products that come from farms are from CORPORATE farms. This notion that we have all these small farmers we rely on is total BS. Anyways 150 years ago most everyone farmed now it's less than 1% Why? Things changed, most farmers had to give it up to do something else. So what is the difference today? What is all this nostalgia for the small farmer? If he can't make it move on do something else like 99% of other farmers have over the last 150 years. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,813
|
lefties are always whining on about "what's right". well, the world ain't fair. if you want all your food to cost 50% more in a year, then go ahead and stop all immigration and cheap labor
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,762
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Trailer Park
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
The Demon & 12clicks
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
|
So a company can threat to move to Mexico unless it's allowed to hire ilegals at slave wages?
By the way if the company is already breaking the law by hiring illegals I seriously doubt they are paying either all or some of thier taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
|
Quote:
Supply represents the amount of a good or services that people would want to provide at each given price point. Demand represents the amount of that same good or services that people would want to buy at each give price point. The market price is determined where those two lines cross. Unemployment does not occur at the equilibrium point because everyone who wants to work at the wage given match up exactly with the number of jobs that are available. Minimum wages represent an artificial barrier just like a monopoly (but for demand instead of supply) create an inequity but only for jobs where the equilibrium price is lower than the minimum wage. People want to cross the border illegally because the difference between the equilibrium price is so far below the minimum wage that people would be willing to take risks to save themselves the money. The real solution is to eliminate the minimum wage for legal employees, and then create a fine structure force people paying illegal workers make them pay the equivalent to old minimum wage for each illegal worker. Provide a reward (whistle blower pay) for anyone turning in such a shop. This would eliminate the incentive to cross the border and increase the risk of hiring an illegal as well. But getting rid of the minimum wage would be political suicide so they are talking about allowing guest visa to AVOID technological innovation that would eliminate 100% of the jobs (both legal and illegal). The technological innovation that would allow a business to continue without the need for illegal workers would also put the legal workers out of work too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
|
Quote:
1. Move taking all the jobs to mexico 2. implement a technological solution that would eliminate the need for labor force in both cases the LEGAL jobs disappear too. Orange Growers in california have to produce oranges at a market rate that is consistant with oranges grown in mexico (where all the labour is cheap) market conditions make it impossible to do all three. |
|
|
|
|