GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Business Thread... Am I the only paysite owner fed up of blogs misusing my content? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=588807)

DavieVegas 03-20-2006 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
So are you making sales from blogs or not?

exactly my point. Shap, u named off one of the biggest babe sites. You probably make an extra grand or more a month from his site. Babe sites/blogs are unique in which they are set up however the site owner feels is comfortable for him. As long as it stays within the rules where no one is using ur content to promote another site/company it shouldnt be a problem. Maybe im wrong. I do not agree with the glam0ur site with that 95% AFF.

QQQ 03-20-2006 06:33 PM

If someone links the content directly to your paysite with their affiliate code, that would be ok? I agree it is not honest to use the paysite content supplied by the owner to promote his/her site to promote some other site.

Bake 03-20-2006 06:36 PM

One thing Shap do you screen new affilates?
Maybe if you pulled there accounts and stoped paying them they may stop useing your content.
How did they get the content in the first place?

These days most Paysites seem to give away to much content to stupid newbies who have no idea in how to market.All you seem to do to be able to get access to a shitload of content is simply signup to the affilate programe.

Maybe its about time paysite owners start looking at the amount of free shit they do give away.

Anyone with half a brain know's that 5% of your affilates base make you 95% of your affilate sales.
The rest are just used as sheep to brand name your shit out there.
If you dont like it then do something about it.
Ive even had paysites owners tell me when I have reported thiefed to them thats its ok because they left the watermarks on.

Doctor Dre 03-20-2006 06:43 PM

Well it's simple ... in the article, there should be only links to twisty. there can be a header, side bars and footers, but there gotta be at least 25 % of the article's space spent for advertising.

And by 25 %, I mean 25 % of the total space the blog is taking ... like most galleries. Not just a small banner at top and bottom.

DavieVegas 03-20-2006 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter
I'm surprised a program owner would come here and openly bash bodsforthemods the way he did. Bods is well known by program owners, and speaks with almost all of them directly. He does business with most on a personal level daily. He's one of the most business oriented website owners there are. Of course he has out done himself once again by quickly negotiating with twistys instead of just dropping the galleries.

I'd also like to point out shap's misrepresentation of the term "fusker" in this thread. Fusker is a term in the webmaster community to be a site which uses an automated script to rip and host a hotlinked gallery. The galleries you posted from bodsforthemods. Do not hotlink any images. You used the term "fusker" improperly to accuse websites which are indeed not "fusker" galleries.
Top two definitions taken from urban dictionary:

And lastly. Where as it may seem I simply hold a biased opinion (note me flying the bods site in my sig). I've worked with bods on countless projects and will continue to for some time. He's an upstanding webmaster with excellent business ethics. Which, after shap having talked with him this afternoon. I'm sure he can agree with.


Im just really appalled that this is how a program owner with a problem was conducted. Contact people 1 on 1. If you have ever dealt with bods you would know things get accomplished very fast with communication. Blasting someone who is as upstanding as he is, is completely uncalled for. With that said im sure twistys just lost a crapload of sales due to other blog owners now reading this, no matter if they are galleries are fine under twistys rules. I feel that this is a open attack because people do not understand the whole "Blog" thing. TGP's have been doing worse for years and no complaints. But my advice to shap and twisty's is either talk to the owners of these sites and more you find, or just close the accounts. No need for this whole outburst.

DavieVegas 03-20-2006 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter
This thread will do nothing to the honest sites. What 99% of the people posting in this thread don't realise is program owners know and conduct business with the honest sites daily. There is a reason you havn't seen any of the major single girl and teen sponsors posting in this thread. They are on a first name basis with the honest sites listed in this thread. The people that matter are the ones not posting in this thread. As the real business is done outside of GFY on a personal level. Much like what has taken place with Twistys behind the scenes (which none of you will ever know about).

Amen my man. Nothing more to say!

Rui 03-20-2006 07:11 PM

Most of these so called "blogs" are nothing but a mix of tgp's with cj's (when it comes to sponsor link-farms)...

Tempest 03-20-2006 07:25 PM

I can understand the issue with some of those sites, but I don't see the badgirlsblog as being all that bad. You click the thumb, you get the full size pic, you click the pic you get the sponsor. Yeah, the "selling" aspect is practically non-existent but frankly I don't see it much different than all the TGP galleries out there with links that are barely visible or that are limited to 1-3 by the TGP rules. And those crap TGP galleries get seen by a shit load more freeloaders than the majority of the babelogs. Most of the people in this biz don't sell.. they slap some shit together, shove it out the door and hope it makes some money.

As for the other banners (AFF) on the page. Come on... For YEARS people used free hosts with a shit load of other banners on the page as well. As a marketer, my job is to get the surfer to buy something to make me some money. So yeah, my main focus on a page is to try and get them to buy from the primary sponsor. But not putting up a couple links for other things like dating sites, enhancement products or similar themed pay sites etc. is just idiotic. Yes.. They shouldn't be the main focus of the page and should be limited in quantity, but if they don't buy from the main promotion, I need to try and get them to buy something else.

llporter 03-20-2006 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJSLIMM
Here is a question though? How would affiliates feel if we had AFF banners on all our hosted galleries?

They would probably feel the same way they do as when sponsors put email collection boxes on FHGs and try to sell videos and dvds to surfers prior to the purchase of a membership. They would say screw that sponsor I'll just make my own galleries. Oh wait a minute -- that is what these "babelogs" are doing.

Shap 03-20-2006 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flu
While I do agree that you have every right to require anything out of anyone using your content, I do believe you conducted yourself here in a very unprofessional manner.

Sites like bodsforthemods, badgirlsblog and glam0ur make up a large portion of your traffic and sale. And to call them out in public like theyre scam artists looking to cheat you, rather than emailing them and talking to them on an individual basis is bad business.

You have every right to be upset and I'm not going to argue against you on that, however, these are some of your biggest accounts and you're treating them like they don't help you pay your bills. That's biting the hand that feeds you.

You shouldnt have made a drama thread on GFY to handle this situation, each one of these webmasters is reachable by email and ICQ. You have their information and you should have used it.

How would you feel if babebloggers started posting 1 in 2227 twistys stats all over the place without trying to work something out with you or your staff first? This type of action is something that should be avoided, especially by someone that has so many people invested in them that they should really start taking the higher road more often.

Just fyi blogs make up less than 2% of all our signups. Truth is blogs could not send me another sale and I would not lose any sleep at night. That is a fact. There is not a single blog that is even near our top 10 biggest affiliates.

This thread came after months of the same shit happening over and over. I got fed up and had to post to see if I was alone feeling these babelogs were getting way out of hand.

Shap 03-20-2006 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flu
Maybe you don't realize this, but a lot of people do this for a living and it should be somewhat of a professional enviroment, especially if youre going to be calling people scammers. And maybe you don't realize this either, but some babeblogs do upwards of over $20k-40k a month in conversions to sponsors.

From what I understand, theres no existing rule set that these blogs have broken. So why try and tarnish their reputation?

You are wrong. The examples I posted are breaking most of the rules those sponsors have in place. Ask penthouse if they like their content being used that way.

Shap 03-20-2006 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavieVegas
Im just really appalled that this is how a program owner with a problem was conducted. Contact people 1 on 1. If you have ever dealt with bods you would know things get accomplished very fast with communication. Blasting someone who is as upstanding as he is, is completely uncalled for. With that said im sure twistys just lost a crapload of sales due to other blog owners now reading this, no matter if they are galleries are fine under twistys rules. I feel that this is a open attack because people do not understand the whole "Blog" thing. TGP's have been doing worse for years and no complaints. But my advice to shap and twisty's is either talk to the owners of these sites and more you find, or just close the accounts. No need for this whole outburst.

If there is nothing wrong with what they are doing then there is nothing wrong with me posting their links. Right?

Flu 03-20-2006 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
You are wrong. The examples I posted are breaking most of the rules those sponsors have in place. Ask penthouse if they like their content being used that way.

Well... I guess that's where we're different. I would infact ASK PENTHOUSE, 1 on 1 through their contact information and not make a thread on GFY whilst dragging their name throught the mud.

I guess that's how we're different in business. You find it logical and ethical to mistreat people that are attempting to promote your site, even if you don't agree with how theyre doing. You find it to be good business to label them scammers and fuskers on a public forum, rather than having your staff email them.

The fact that your site has any growth with these morals is beyond me, but once again, that's how we're different.

You also believe its Good Business to LOSE INSTANTLY an alleged and projected 2% of your sales without losing any sleep over it. That doesnt reflect someone that has any kind of intergrity or... place any value into their affiliates.

If you anlienate the babeblogs... whose next? Like I said... you have every right to do anything you want with your content. But how you handled the situation was a definate "F- Wouldn't Buy Again, Buyers Beware."

potter 03-20-2006 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
Just fyi blogs make up less than 2% of all our signups. Truth is blogs could not send me another sale and I would not lose any sleep at night. That is a fact. There is not a single blog that is even near our top 10 biggest affiliates.

This thread came after months of the same shit happening over and over. I got fed up and had to post to see if I was alone feeling these babelogs were getting way out of hand.

http://goddam.net/orly.jpg

So you closed the Twistys affiliate accounts of the sites you posted here in this thread?

Shap 03-20-2006 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flu
Well... I guess that's where we're different. I would infact ASK PENTHOUSE, 1 on 1 through their contact information and not make a thread on GFY whilst dragging their name throught the mud.

I guess that's how we're different in business. You find it logical and ethical to mistreat people that are attempting to promote your site, even if you don't agree with how theyre doing. You find it to be good business to label them scammers and fuskers on a public forum, rather than having your staff email them.

The fact that your site has any growth with these morals is beyond me, but once again, that's how we're different.

You also believe its Good Business to LOSE INSTANTLY an alleged and projected 2% of your sales without losing any sleep over it. That doesnt reflect someone that has any kind of intergrity or... place any value into their affiliates.

If you anlienate the babeblogs... whose next? Like I said... you have every right to do anything you want with your content. But how you handled the situation was a definate "F- Wouldn't Buy Again, Buyers Beware."

LOL :1orglaugh Do some research on me. If I'm someone you aren't going to do business with because I'm a jackass and I don't know how to handle my business then I think you'll run out of people to do business with in a hurry. There are not many people in the industry that care for affiliates, surfers and for the good of this industry as much as I do.

Shap 03-20-2006 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster
I believe that Shap was entirely correct to use this forum to ask the question he did - he didnt start a drama thread - simpy asked a business question that is a valid question.

I do have one additional question for you Shap - how do you feel about your content being used for skimming purposes on TGPs? I know that recently a few paysite owners have added rules disallowing this practice as their feeling is that if a thumb of their content is shown, the surfer clicking the thumb ought to get their gallery/pic - not thrown off to another site for a trade.

Thanks Linkster. I believe in being reasonable. I started as a cj site. I know what goes thru the minds of free site, cj, tgp, blog, owners. I try to accomodate their needs as best I can. I personally believe sponsors getting their panties in a bunch over a 100x150 thumbnail are going a little overboard. My position is simple as long as you send 60+% of the clicks to the gallery of that thumb I'm cool.

Flu 03-20-2006 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
There are not many people in the industry that care for affiliates, surfers and for the good of this industry as much as I do.

I find that ironic since you essentially told 2% of your sales to fuck off. You basically told babe bloggers that you could care less if they promote your content. That doesnt seem like you care for your affiliates that much.

I'd like to see some evidence that it's just 2%.

Shap 03-20-2006 08:42 PM

All the bloggers have come out to call me out and say I handled this the wrong way. Hey look back at the first post. I stated my opinion on the subject. I posted examples to see what other paysites thought. This has been bothering me for a while and I wanted to see what the rest of the industry thought. I didn't call anyone names. I just asked what others thought. If the links I posted were ok then there would be no issue and I'd look like a moron for posting them. Obviously since you are all upset because I'm touching on something you feel you have to defend.

Shap 03-20-2006 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flu
I find that ironic since you essentially told 2% of your sales to fuck off. You basically told babe bloggers that you could care less if they promote your content. That doesnt seem like you care for your affiliates that much.

I'd like to see some evidence that it's just 2%.

LOL where did I tell 2% of my affiliates to fuck off? LOL.

You can pick on me all you want. Instead of attacking me why don't you research the posts I've made in the past and sitback and learn something. I'm sure you'll see I'm someone not worth wasting time attacking.

Shap 03-20-2006 08:52 PM

Flu,

If I didn't care about my affiliates and if I was an asshole I'd terminate their accounts and keep the money. I don't do that. Instead we contact each of them one by one and explain what we are looking for and work with our affiliates to make things right. In this thread I did not sling shit at one single Twistys affiliate. All I did was post links. Please show me one example where I talked shit and told a Twistys affiliate to F off.

We work day and night for our surfers and affiliates. There are not many other companies that care like us that I can 100% guarantee. That is why I'm sitting here debating and replying to posts. Most other companies would have said f-off newbie or ignored the negative comments. Instead I'm replying and with every reply working to understand the mindset of those that disagree.

Through all of this we've already developed a number of potential solutions to what I feel is a problem (abuse of promo content use) and none of the solutions involve us telling anybody to F off.

potter 03-20-2006 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
why don't you research the posts I've made in the past and sitback and learn something.

That's strange. Because, you say..

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
I didn't call anyone names.

Yet, you called the sites fusker sites/galleries. And I clearly posted this was purely name calling. So, if you would as you say "research the posts I've made in the past and sit back and learn something". You would see you did indeed name call.

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter
I'd also like to point out shap's misrepresentation of the term "fusker" in this thread. Fusker is a term in the webmaster community to be a site which uses an automated script to rip and host a hotlinked gallery. The galleries you posted from bodsforthemods. Do not hotlink any images. You used the term "fusker" improperly to accuse websites which are indeed not "fusker" galleries.
Top two definitions taken from urban dictionary:
Quote:

1. fusker 39 up, 15 down
The act of iteratively accessing (pornographic) photographs using automated technologies.
Noticing that the photographs on the website were numbered, Ned decided to fusker them.
by xsg Oct 10, 2004

2. fusker 21 up, 3 down
To hotlink images or videos and steal the sites bandwidth. Usually used on sites targetted at under 18 year olds who want free pornography.
Lets fusker this image gallery!
by BackToMine Jan 14, 2005


potter 03-20-2006 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
Flu,

If I didn't care about my affiliates and if I was an asshole I'd terminate their accounts and keep the money. I don't do that. Instead we contact each of them one by one and explain what we are looking for and work with our affiliates to make things right. In this thread I did not sling shit at one single Twistys affiliate. All I did was post links. Please show me one example where I talked shit and told a Twistys affiliate to F off.

well.....
Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
I think these blogs pollute their sites and junk up their look with 1000000 links because they aren't making enough money to pay the bw bill and that's the only way they can survive. If you can't pay your bw bill by promoting sites the proper way then you are doing something wrong. And if you have trouble paying the bw just do us all a favour and quit.


Verbal Kint 03-20-2006 08:59 PM

Its funny how AFF pops up everytime there is problems with stolen content, I guess they accept everyone into their program

Shap 03-20-2006 09:02 PM

btw... Flu you are a young guy breaking into the industry. I can tell by your work that you have some talent and that you are original and like to try new things. That's real good. Now I know you think I'm the big bad wolf here but I'm not. You made assumptions in this thread that were very far from the truth and I believe were made simply because you might not know better.

With or without blog sales we are doing very well. I did well before blogs came out. I'll probably do well well after blogs have matured and are no longer the fad. My point is I don't need blogs to be successful. That doesn't mean I'm turning them away. That means they don't play a huge role in the success of Twistys. You made a post indicating you felt blogs were a big part of our sales. They are not. In fact here check out the stats I posted earlier this year. These were taken way before any porn blogs existed.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=558484

potter 03-20-2006 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
on another sour note- blogs and user forums/communities are pretty similar architectures and the "user"-posted stolen content from most of the programs already mentioned here is staggering. all of the big paysites are ripped and posted by these vermon/thieves. we all know it- but what are companies like twistys et al. doing about it? it seems like the tide is in favor of the vermon as of right now....

even if one's content is watermarked - that is no excuse for a webmaster to misuse it. the surfer mentality becomes "why should i pay?" and we are left with only newbies and hardcore fans paying....

You are 100% right unfortunately

You agree to comparing the babeblogs to the forums/communities that post and allow stolen and ripped content. :helpme

JD 03-20-2006 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prairie
Tell me you didn't just diss the babeloggers and kiss bods ass at the same time.

jesus. i'm not "dissing" anyone, nor am I kissing anyones ass. bodsforthemods IS one of the better babeblogs and as far as I know, a lot of the other babeblogs are crap. Never once did I name names or talk shit about anyone else. Read into what I said all you want. But the truth is that what I said is MY opinion. It may be wrong, but that's what I think.

potter 03-20-2006 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
You are right. Babelogs are the problem and the ones i've seen have no clue how to sell anything. They junk it up.

Don't know how to sell anything? :helpme

Shap 03-20-2006 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter
That's strange. Because, you say..



Yet, you called the sites fusker sites/galleries. And I clearly posted this was purely name calling. So, if you would as you say "research the posts I've made in the past and sit back and learn something". You would see you did indeed name call.

Dude I'm not even going to waste time nitpicking on this anymore. Honestly we both have money to make and discussing what i called a fusker and what wasn't and blahblahblah is not making either of us a dime.

When i said research i meant research stuff like
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=558484

and

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=473292

Shap 03-20-2006 09:07 PM

I'm wasting my time debating with two guys named potter and flu. <sigh> I'm losing my touch. I've gone from the Mallicks, JoeEs, 12Clicks to potter and flu. I'm not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing.

Flu 03-20-2006 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
Flu,

If I didn't care about my affiliates and if I was an asshole I'd terminate their accounts and keep the money. I don't do that. Instead we contact each of them one by one and explain what we are looking for and work with our affiliates to make things right. In this thread I did not sling shit at one single Twistys affiliate. All I did was post links. Please show me one example where I talked shit and told a Twistys affiliate to F off.

We work day and night for our surfers and affiliates. There are not many other companies that care like us that I can 100% guarantee. That is why I'm sitting here debating and replying to posts. Most other companies would have said f-off newbie or ignored the negative comments. Instead I'm replying and with every reply working to understand the mindset of those that disagree.

Through all of this we've already developed a number of potential solutions to what I feel is a problem (abuse of promo content use) and none of the solutions involve us telling anybody to F off.

If you don't see how you saying "i wouldnt lose sleep if I lost 2% of my sales" telling babeblogs to fuck off, then I'm just at a loss for words. That's definetly not "tuned in customer service".

I'm not going to continue this discourse, I don't feel like arguing point and counter point on the same topic all night long. I feel how you handled this situation was uncalled for and wrong. You say you contact your affiliates 1 on 1 but you didnt do that here.

Anyway... you have every right to do what you want, it's your content, you could cancel accounts posting more than 1 pic in galleries for all I care. Just try to be a bit more tasteful and tactful from now on.

Babe blogs drive sales. It may be a fact that you and a lot of people in the industry aren't ready to admit yet, but its true. If you don't understand the marketing theory behind how blogs reach a potential that is possibly light years ahead and superior to that of TGPs and Free Sites when it comes to conversions, then you have a lot of catching up to do.

The only proof I need in this statement rests in all of the other programs that validated your claim that initiated this thread and agreed with how you called out those blogs today.

Shap 03-20-2006 09:12 PM

Anyhow, Mr Potter, Mr Flu and anybody else that has anything they'd like to tell me is invited to email me. My email is shap at twistys dot com. I'm going to get back to making our affiliates money :winkwink: I've spent too much time on this. The good thing is this thread helped us come up with solutions that should make everybody happier (including Potter & Flu). Besides that anybody with a problem, concern, praise, attack, insult, compliment, or sexy picture to send me feel free to do so by email. :thumbsup

Flu 03-20-2006 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shap
btw... Flu you are a young guy breaking into the industry. I can tell by your work that you have some talent and that you are original and like to try new things. That's real good. Now I know you think I'm the big bad wolf here but I'm not. You made assumptions in this thread that were very far from the truth and I believe were made simply because you might not know better.

With or without blog sales we are doing very well. I did well before blogs came out. I'll probably do well well after blogs have matured and are no longer the fad. My point is I don't need blogs to be successful. That doesn't mean I'm turning them away. That means they don't play a huge role in the success of Twistys. You made a post indicating you felt blogs were a big part of our sales. They are not. In fact here check out the stats I posted earlier this year. These were taken way before any porn blogs existed.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=558484

Thanks. Like I said, I agree that you have every right to regulate your content in anyway you feel fit. It belongs to you and your word should be final. But these blogs, regardless of your opinion on their worth, deserve to be treated better than just mere fads.

Bods makes enough money to support his family with his babe blog. I can promise you that badgirlsblog and glam0ur do as well. Calling them out like that isn't like calling out a scammer or a hacker or a spammer, you're calling out someone that might be breaking a rule that could easily be fixed with a little communication.

You may see them as running a fad, but theyre really running a successful business.

potter 03-20-2006 09:41 PM

That's fine. I know what actually went on today and what you have done outside of this thread. That's all that matters to me. A GFY reputation is not on my list of concerns.

RawAlex 03-20-2006 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prairie
http://dailyhotties.net/ariel_rebel/ <<adbrite ads/dating gold/adengage and links to 20 other babelogs and ariel rebel is converting 1:226. I think thats fair as the links to panchodog are displayed IMO very prominantly above the fold.

1:226 to that sponsor is fine, but how many clicks and how much money was made with the other sponsors / sites / ad systems from that page? How much did the sponsor providing the content make from those other sales? How many of those other sales would have happened on a blank page without the image(s)?

It is sort of the question of how much money was made because of the sponsor's content that won't be shared by the sponsor - basically money made with the content without paying for the content.

It isn't to poke - it is really a serious question about the finances and viablity of these sorts of sites.

Alex

Shap 03-20-2006 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter
That's fine. I know what actually went on today and what you have done outside of this thread. That's all that matters to me. A GFY reputation is not on my list of concerns.

I know you think what i did in this thread was wrong.

I'm guessing you feel what was done outside this thread was right. Is that correct?

Head_Hunter 03-20-2006 09:48 PM

Were is your term's page Shap?

Shap 03-20-2006 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Head_Hunter
Were is your term's page Shap?

Here are our terms from the affiliate area regarding use of promo content
A few rules that we require all affiliates to follow:
- Galleries should never contain more than 20 pics in them
- Our watermark is never removed from the pictures
- The galleries may not promote another site or program.

I'm going to be going into detail and updating the rules page this week.

bigdog 03-20-2006 09:53 PM

Don't listen to this fake ricky martin where is the real ricky martin aka nlyz at

crockett 03-20-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prairie
http://dailyhotties.net/ariel_rebel/ <<adbrite ads/dating gold/adengage and links to 20 other babelogs and ariel rebel is converting 1:226. I think thats fair as the links to panchodog are displayed IMO very prominantly above the fold.


actually the first gallery I got when I clicked that link had a shit load of links to other sponsors.. The very first add you saw was for "girls gone wild" There looked to only be 1 link to Ariel Rebel on the entire gallery.

I clicked it a second time and it went to a gallery that was pushing Ariel Rebel pretty heavily.. several links to her site and any other ads were at the bottom.

So whats the deal did you change the gallery? Because what I see now isn't what I saw the first time.

Head_Hunter 03-20-2006 10:01 PM

Hey shap you got icq ? I wanna get my account up and running tonight:)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123