GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Dirty little secrets of affiliate programs ... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=574648)

SteveLightspeed 02-11-2006 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixxxthsense
wow did someone snap? are you being sarcastic?

Of course I'm being sarcastic! I agree there are some "dirty tricks" used by some sponsors, but I really think the sponsor/affiliate relationship is a PARTNERSHIP, and should be treated as a COOPERATIVE EFFORT to make a sale and distribute the profits FAIRLY.

At Lightspeedcash, we do our very best to accomodate our affiliates. My post was to emphasize how many "simple requests" from individual affiliates can add up to "overwhelming demands" from a sponsor's point of view!

Steve Lightspeed

xxxice 02-11-2006 12:17 PM

Crazy stuff good thread :thumbsup

XMaster 02-11-2006 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed
This is what I want in a sponsor:

SPONSORS WANTED:
[...]

We perfectly match :1orglaugh

SteveLightspeed 02-11-2006 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julien
We perfectly match :1orglaugh

Not really.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed
I'd like to find someone who will recruit hot new 18 year old girls... "

I said "hot" and "new" girls

webgurl 02-11-2006 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixxxthsense
wow did someone snap? are you being sarcastic?

I think steve is being more realistic than sarcastic :upsidedow

baddog 02-11-2006 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox
....says the guy with the biggest signature this side of the mason-dixon


:winkwink:


I had no idea the Mason-Dixon line extended that far around the world.

baddog 02-11-2006 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultchica
You pointed out two of my biggest pet peeves:

High minimum payouts. 100$ is usually no big deal unless I figure out their conversions suddenly suck ass once you are getting near the minimum payout and it takes 5,000 uniques for one sale! That is what gets me.

Anything over 100$ minimum payout is truly ridiculous. Read what I found in an affiliate program I signed up for. Don't get me wrong, it's a pretty good program. But it's going to take me at least a few months to hit their minimum payout, especially since I'm new:

The minimum payout is $500. If this amount is not reached in one month the amount will be carried over to the next month(s) untill it is reached.

If you can believe that!

And my other pet peeve is putting their site URL on the banners. BIG NO NO. If they are clicking the banner and going to your site with my code, that is the way it should be. They should not be seeing your URL and typing it in. NOT when it's coming from my pages! I DO NOT put banners with the URL on it anywhere on any of my sites


Why would you sign up for a program with a $500 min payout if you know it is going to take months to get there?

DigitalPimp 02-11-2006 01:05 PM

Thanks for bringing some humor to the thread Steve. :) Personally I think most of the things mentioned in this thread should not even have to be requested but rather built into a program from the start. Unfortunately when many sponsors create their programs they don't seem to take the needs of the affiliates they are partnering with as serious as their own.

woj 02-11-2006 01:07 PM

so here you go ladies and gents, this thread explains how programs can afford to pay $40/signup...

Basic_man 02-11-2006 01:13 PM

Welcome to the board DigitalPimp :)

bdld 02-11-2006 01:17 PM

countless traffic leaks to a sponsors' own dvd store.

DigitalPimp 02-11-2006 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj
so here you go ladies and gents, this thread explains how programs can afford to pay $40/signup...

Your right I just wish more sponsors would innovate a bit more in this regard. For example, offer way more payout options and make them dynamically adjustable by the affiliate. Perhaps ranging from $10 to $50 per sale or 40% to 80% revshare.

The payout options would be based on the number of "dirty little tricks" the affiliate agreed to opt into. Some affiliates might find they make more with lower price points and less dirty little tricks - if they don't they could just make further adjustments until the right mix is found for their type of traffic.

reginaldo 02-11-2006 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed
This is what I want in a sponsor:

SPONSORS WANTED:

I'd like to find someone who will...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh man thats fucking classic steve haha... you forgot the part at the end where he says... So if you can do all this by today ill continue to send you my 489 uniques per day, and if i don't get a sale per day then bump me one cause you shaved it.

xxxice 02-11-2006 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdvertisingSex
I Never Ever Ever Ever Ever Ever Ever Promote Paysites That Steal Your Back Button And Trap You In A Endless Loop. That Shit Should Be Considered "unethical Business Practices"! I Can Name Many Many Many Many That Do This Bullshit!


Please share :)

xxxice 02-11-2006 01:44 PM

Quote:

Wait for the affiliate programs to come and say they have to do so much and we are lucky we get anything. We are paid to much; they have to do this to offset costs whatever.
What did I say ...

andrej_NDC 02-11-2006 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z
I know of one very big GFY poster (that everyone here seems to love) who operates a program that has in the past fucked around with affiliate cookies when he ran big payout bonus days. This is especially problematic since the type of site in question usually isn't sold on the first visit.


Another fairly well known program overwrites affiliate cookies if the surfer comes back through a typein. As soon as they click enter on the warning page, the affiliate cookie is changed to their in-house code.


Paysite URLs on banners. This isn't pay per impression, so I don't know why so many affiliates go along with giving them free brand building.


Non-recurring billing option on revshare sites. $30/mo recurring, or $35-$40 non. The idea here is that a really good paysite knows the non-recurring member will join again right away, and they'll only have to pay the affiliate for that first month. This scam has really started to grow among sponsors recently.


Cascading billing, but affiliate payouts limited to the main biller. There can also be secondary billing options that affiliates don't see credit for.


Severe over-branding on FHG's. They put the URL all over the pace hoping the surfer will just do a typein so they can defraud affiliates out of their traffic.


Ref ID doesn't appear in the bookmarked URL. This is a HUGE problem.


No pay for join page upsells. I don't really have a problem with this on PPS, but revshare needs to be paid out if the upsells go to the same sponsor.


No affiliate notification when a revshare site isn't going to be updated any longer.


Revshare sites that aggressively promote other sites in their network in the members area, but affiliates don't see credit if the surfer leaves for one of these other sites. I just had to deal with a revshare site that apparantly hasn't been updated in months, so they are upselling one of their good sites to it's members.


A links page pointing to various offerings from other companies. The idea here is that everyone in the ring puts up a similar page, and they each get stolen affiliate traffic from one another. This can also be done in the form of sending affiliate traffic to seemingly innocent link lists and whatnot.

looking at all points...and nextdoorcash is still innocent :)

HorseShit 02-11-2006 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Why would you sign up for a program with a $500 min payout if you know it is going to take months to get there?


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Sarah_Jayne 02-11-2006 02:22 PM

on the subject of deleting sites and suddenly redirecting them - it is al the more annoying when it is a program that runs mirco-niche/fetish sites that then suddenly decide to redirect those former fetish sites to 'teen sex' or something. Talk about wasting valuable traffic.

DigitalPimp 02-11-2006 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Why would you sign up for a program with a $500 min payout if you know it is going to take months to get there?

I suspect people sign up for programs with minimum payouts higher than they would like because a site they want to promote is exclusive to that program - like an official porn star site. The bigger problem is when the conversions ratios get progressively worse as you near your minimum payout.

DigitalPimp 02-11-2006 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarah_webinc
on the subject of deleting sites and suddenly redirecting them - it is al the more annoying when it is a program that runs mirco-niche/fetish sites that then suddenly decide to redirect those former fetish sites to 'teen sex' or something. Talk about wasting valuable traffic.

Right or when a softcore site/tour is redirected to a hardcode site without notice.

GatorB 02-11-2006 02:47 PM

You want to complain about high payouts? Well most mainstream programs only pay once a month, some once every 3 months. Sure the payout might only be only $25, but 3 months for a check?

fedfest 02-11-2006 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj
so here you go ladies and gents, this thread explains how programs can afford to pay $40/signup...

Think that will keep anyone from jumping on the next $100 per signup promo day, or start a tread tomorrow looking for the highest paying PPS program ? :pimp

Forkbeard 02-11-2006 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z
Cascading billing, but affiliate payouts limited to the main biller. There can also be secondary billing options that affiliates don't see credit for.

This is the biggest problem I've had with affiliate programs. It's especially common with small fetish sites for some reason.

rowan 02-11-2006 03:33 PM

It doesn't happen THAT often but one of my pet hates is.... programs changing ownership, and the sites magically acquiring new "marketing methods"

For example, a stale revshare program which had been around for years was sold to another well known program, who DELETED all of the FHGs, redirected all of the gallery traffic to a generic 404 page (refid was supposed to be preserved but I am still finding links that do not carry it) which pops up to 5 consoles (some with links to external, uncredited sites sites). That's 5 consoles on a formerly clean revshare site!

Does a 404 page really convert better than a FHG?

HollywoodChris 02-11-2006 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultchica
You pointed out two of my biggest pet peeves:
High minimum payouts. 100$ is usually no big deal unless I figure out their conversions suddenly suck ass once you are getting near the minimum payout and it takes 5,000 uniques for one sale! That is what gets me.


Yea, I recently had this happen with someone.
Right when I hit the $90.00 mark of my 100.00 payout the ratios went to 0:21,000 roughly...

End result is = no more traffic for them... Eventually they will realize that they cant screw over the people that are making them money.
Pretty simple concept to grasp.

Probono 02-11-2006 04:11 PM

Pay heed to Steve Lightspeed's rant. Think about how the age of short retention people can pay you $40 or more for a $4.95 trial without somehow cheating? Be realistic and realize it is a partnership and even paying 50% of a sale is a high marketing cost.

Varius 02-11-2006 04:12 PM

We are probably losing out on a mess of traffic, but the only popups (or in our case, DHTML ad) we use are to advertise our own site features. As well, it is 100% configurable by campaign_id if the Affiliate wishes to turn it on/off (without affecting how much he'll get paid!)

For example, at the moment our float-over features our Mobile service. You can clearly see it links to the join page though while keeping the affiliates' id intact

On the inside of the site, we've had very minimal-to-none upsells (the few times we did it was only for complimentary products for our members like sex toys and herbal). Our only current upsell is to IwantU Live and on that note, we will soon be offering it as a new site for affiliates to promote - so everyone would earn a generous PPS $ on it :thumbsup

We have paid all our affiliates since 1997. Sure there are mixups that happen once in awhile, but in the end everyone always gets paid (weekly at that!).

If you haven't already, give us a shot; I think you'll be glad you did.

http://affiliates.iwantu.com

Rui 02-11-2006 04:33 PM

Steve's post deserves a whole book of cartons from SOS ;)

its true most of what he said tho (sadly)

Rochard 02-11-2006 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DigitalPimp

No email or even news posted at their site regarding discontinued or otherwise inactive sites. Programs will often just quietly remove the link code from the linking page. The affiliate link code may just no longer work or if you are lucky redirect the traffic to another site in their network but unfortunately often the site is not in their network and thus you get no credit. If you got PPC ads running for the site and you do not keep on top of this, you could be buying advertising for the site with the traffic all getting redirected to a site outside their network for their profit.

This is a bit unfair.

The problem is that when a program removes a site from their program, everyone comes to GFY and other boards and says "what happened" and unfairly looks for drama. Every time a site is dropped from a program affiliates love to create drama and programs want don't want bad posts about them on boards.

This isn't a dirty little trick, this is the end result of affiliates creating drama where there isn't any.

Larger programs and those using Nats / MPA3 can change those links so the traffic isn't lost. Sometimes programs can't do that and the traffic is indeed lost.

Linkster 02-11-2006 04:58 PM

Id say the one thing that bothers me the most is having to go in every week and check every one of my ccbill sponsors in the admin area to see which one turned off rebills this week - and with over 100 of them it gets time consuming - but that list is getting smaller every week.

In response to an earlier post about NSCash - having been an affiliate ther since they opened, they have closed down at least one site that I remember - but there was emails, posts on their WM board and even an icq from their manager a good month before they did it and they even offered to help with scripts to change out the link codes to go to the girls new affiliate site with another program.

As far as not understanding the process of raws/uniques and all of the inside the paysite leaks and cross-sells - it sounds like some people need to do a little studying before they sign up as an affiliate and understand what they are getting into - its all a part of the biz and has been forever - its always been your option to either live with it or not join - heck - with most of us that have been around a while we even figure in a percentage shave on our numbers before we send traffic to a program(which it looks like a lot of people are defining shave to include things like crosssells and email collections etc now) - just like we do with all of our offline businesses.

F U S I O N 02-11-2006 05:05 PM

This is an interesting read.... Good things to keep an eye out for, a bunch I have never heard of. Thanks for the post and heads up!

DigitalPimp 02-11-2006 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Probono
Pay heed to Steve Lightspeed's rant. Think about how the age of short retention people can pay you $40 or more for a $4.95 trial without somehow cheating? Be realistic and realize it is a partnership and even paying 50% of a sale is a high marketing cost.

Unfortunately, some programs seem to believe affiliates are not capable or interested in helping to detemine how their traffic is best monetized once it leaves their site.

Personally I would prefer to partnership with a program that offered the option for lower payouts per sale by allowing affiliates to opt out of such tactics rather than with a company with higher payouts per sale funded by their focus on the latest way to secretly monetize my traffic without me receiving credit.

At the end of the day what matters most is net profit and how well you get to sleep at night. If I am given the choice between a program that did not do any of this stuff that generated 10 sales at $20 each or one that did them and generated 5 sales at $40 each, I know which one I would choose.

DigitalPimp 02-11-2006 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocHard
This is a bit unfair.

The problem is that when a program removes a site from their program, everyone comes to GFY and other boards and says "what happened" and unfairly looks for drama. Every time a site is dropped from a program affiliates love to create drama and programs want don't want bad posts about them on boards.

This isn't a dirty little trick, this is the end result of affiliates creating drama where there isn't any.

Larger programs and those using Nats / MPA3 can change those links so the traffic isn't lost. Sometimes programs can't do that and the traffic is indeed lost.

If the program took the time to notify their affiliates that they were going to close one of their sites before it happened, I seriously doubt any affiliate would come on the boards and create any drama. I would guess the reason most complain is because they were not told about it beforehand. Programs using NATS may be able to do that but that does not mean they do.

xxxice 02-11-2006 05:53 PM

Click on the members area on paysite tours and sometimes you get a pretty much blank page saying that you are not authorized to login. But on others you are taken to a 404 page or another one without your ref code ...

bigdog 02-11-2006 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob
a couple of things I 'don't like':

* Minimum payouts. If there isn't an option to set it to '0', I hate it. (Some sponsors even have different minimums for US and international webmasters: $100 minimum for US webmasters, $200, $500 or higher minimums for international webmasters...)

* Putting a 'webmaster' link on your paysites without my ref code <-- hate it.

* Some sponsors sell your details to spammers. Recently I found out A*P*C* and W*W*C* were doing this. dropped them immediately .

* 'broken' FHGs.

* Adding a 'Logo'-watermark to your content is fine, adding a url-watermark to your content (FHGs) is not.

* redirects of any kind.

* using cookies to track sales. (not getting paid for nocookie traffic)

* Some sponsors like P*P* won't pay you for webmasters referrals if you don't actively promote them yourself.

come on you expect programs not to to watermark the pciture content they have on FHG

DigitalPimp 02-11-2006 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog
come on you expect programs not to to watermark the pciture content they have on FHG

As he pointed out, there is a difference between a watermark containing a logo and a url.

u-Bob 02-11-2006 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog
come on you expect programs not to to watermark the pciture content they have on FHG

If they want to watermark their images to prevent copyright infrignement, all they have to do is include their logo, company name,...
If they include their url as part of the watermark, they are only doing that to get typeins...

bigdog 02-11-2006 06:32 PM

u-bob for example bangbus.com watermark would be a nono but bangbus would be ok?

fedfest 02-11-2006 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanderweb
Click on the members area on paysite tours and sometimes you get a pretty much blank page saying that you are not authorized to login. But on others you are taken to a 404 page or another one without your ref code ...

That shouldn't matter anything as naturally you won't have reff codes on 404 pages.. what does matter is if your reff code is still there when you click back !
.. or more specificly, what really matters is if your reff code carries through to the join page, no matter what you click on your way to get there :)

BVF 02-11-2006 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DigitalPimp
As he pointed out, there is a difference between a watermark containing a logo and a url.

doesn't matter...the surfers just aren't looking at the pictures..They're SAVING them to their harddrive...So even if they don't buy a membership and don't make either the sponsor or the affiliate any money. At least a watermarked photo will be on that hard drive...He may trade it or post it years later.

Or some fool could just use the same content to promote another sponsor or something...I've had people take pics of some of my black crackheads and use a whole set of pics to promote some white teen site (they're mainly russians) . There's NO WAY I'd let any of my pictures be published without the url. and I know for a fact that I'm lazy..If I could click a link and go to a site, i'd do that before I took the time to typein the domain and I type 100wpm.

Plus there's all kinds of legitimate ways that you as the affiliate could lose the sale...All the person has to do is look at your gallery at work and then go home and typein the domain and as the affiliate, you're screwed right there...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123